Thundercrack85
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 21,668
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 33
Hillary Clinton is probably the most introverted, at least when it comes to the press. She has yet to give a single press conference since she started running.
Clinton's FBI interview was today. Now that is quite interesting in terms of timing. If I'm not mistaken, that was supposed to happen at the end of the summer. Bill meets with the AG and suddenly it happens two days later? AG says she is going to accept any recommendations of the FBI and two days later Clinton is meeting with them?
It seems to me that Lynch probably knows that the FBI is not going to recommend indictment. That is why she said what she did. The meeting with Bill was probably a way of telling Hillary to go through with the interview and they could get all of this indictment talk over with before the convention.
Still, if that is the case, why not just send aides? I understand the reason for not having the conversation electronically considering everything is getting hacked these days. But they had to realize that a former President meeting with the Attorney General would raise some eyebrows. Maybe they wanted to keep the circle small, avoid leaks?
It just oozes that great American justice doesn't it?
Hillary for Queen.
Yeah if the Republicans did this, it would be nothing but people on Social Media and 24/7 News Networks turning blood red in the face screaming "CORRUPTION!"
But it's OK since its the Democrats (specifically the Clintons) doing it.
Honestly if i had to choose between Donald Trump and a convicted white collar crook... white collar crook it is.
Yeah if the Republicans did this, it would be nothing but people on Social Media and 24/7 News Networks turning blood red in the face screaming "CORRUPTION!"
But it's OK since its the Democrats (specifically the Clintons) doing it.
I think if Bill was going to bribe Lynch he wouldn't do it at an airport.
There are a lot of attorneys. They all have friends and friends with spouses. Im sure Lynch isn't the first to be involved in an investigation involving a friend or spouse of a friend. And I'm sure she isn't the first attorney to have a conversation with a friend or spouse of a friend that was being investigated. As long as the case isn't discussed there is no problem.
It's become a who do you trust more to not run us into the ground immediately?
With Trump the only consolation is that he'd maybe be a puppet ruler and more sane heads would direct him.
I'm confident that with Hillary Clinton things will go mostly unchanged... perhaps even improve.
With Trump, just looking at this tax plan, we're in for another Great Recession. Then there's all the other crazy crap. Torture, stifling free press, religious discrimination, trades wars... the wall. It just goes on and on.
Also something to be said for national dignity. Trump acts and sounds like a third grade bully. You think Bush damaged America's reputation, you ain't seen nothing yet.
Provides tax credits for investments in community development and infrastructure and for hiring apprentices or profit-sharing.
Increases standard deduction to $25K for individuals and $50K for married filers.
Personally I do think Hillary Clinton is corrupt.
It's become a who do you trust more to not run us into the ground immediately?
With Trump the only consolation is that he'd maybe be a puppet ruler and more sane heads would direct him.
What about his tax plan do you think would trigger another great recession? That seems a little extreme, especially since he's brought on people to revise it to cut the costs. Hillary's tax plan is predicted to slow economic growth in the short term. This is my favorite aspect of Hillary's tax plan
and this is my favorite aspect of Trump's.
If he was a puppet ruler the current GOP leadership would be directing him and that's not much better than Trump running things.
I don't pretend to be an economist, but I have read the analysis of several economists, they all agree the tax cuts would be catastrophic. I was surprised because one of the biggest critics was the Washington Post. And then there's the tariffs.
Not surprising. It is exactly as the Bureau said...she acted carelessly, not criminally
'This investigation was done honestly, competently and independently, no outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.'
She did act criminally. She had 110 classified emails sent outside of security protocols. Anyone else with that level of clearance would likely face charges. She may have not meant to act criminally but she did in fact act criminally. He said he wouldn't recommend charges because no sane prosecutor would take up the case. Really?
The FBI using words like "extremely careless" is pretty bad imo. This won't be the end of it. You can't have that sort of clearance and act extremely careless. Yet another example of how rules don't apply to the elite. Clinton is lucky she's managed to get a septic tank as her opponent this time. Sad days indeed.
Not surprising. It is exactly as the Bureau said...she acted carelessly, not criminally
Clearly you do not know what it means to act criminally is then. With the exception of certain crimes (such as manslaughter), you cannot act criminally through reckless behavior. All crime must have intent. If she did not mean to act criminally, she did not act criminally as there is no mens rea. Every crime must have a guilty act (actus reus) and a guilty mind (mens rea). If you lack one, it is not a criminal act. Thus, she did not act criminally.