M.E.H.Z.E.B said:
Hey there Pat. How you doin?
DvilDog said:
Hangin' in thar. Nursin' a cough that Just. Won't. Go. Away. Gah!
But I'll live LOL.
Steelsheen said:
well i saw the promotional posters, so i assumed
Yeah, it was a no-show from what I understand (other than some advertising posters and whatnot.)
besides there's a thread somewhere here about critics' assement that SR would flop. pissed off the the usual suspects of course. as I've said I'm probably not the best person to ask about these matters given that I'm biased against critics in general

.
Often as is the case, I end up liking what critics loathe, and loathe what they praise, so I can relate. That said, there have been some interesting comments made recently that I find myself agreeing with in principle.
Here's one such article...
http://www.miamipoetryreview.com/articles/superman-returns-movie300506.shtml
Obviously, nobody can really know anything till they've seen the product, but I'm really starting to believe SR will lend new meaning to the term, "YMMV." We shall see.
Pickle-El said:
But geeeez, they are making Tobey look absolutely AWFUL in these pics...
I agree, but isn't PP supposed to be a dorky teenager? Kinda sorta?
And people were crying about Routh looking 'EMO' for about a year and a half......YIKES TOBEY!
Hmm.
[Pat debates going "there."]
Can somebody define exactly what "EMO" means in this context? I've seen it applied to music, but I don't have anything definitive in mind in terms of physical appearance. Is there a current celeb that folks can cite as having an "EMO" look (other than Maguire or Routh - 'cause I don't see ANY similarity between those two in appearance.)