The Dark Knight The Dark Knight Fan Review Thread

How Do You Rate The Dark Knight?

  • 10 - The praise isn't a matter of hyperbole. Get your keister to the theater to see this NOW! :up:

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5 - We had to endure the boards crashing for this? :dry:

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1 - They should have stopped while they were ahead with Batman Begins. :down


Results are only viewable after voting.
Perfection...utter perfection. There is nothing to say that has not already been said.This is the best comic-film adaptation and I reckon it will be for some time. Everyone was perfectly cast.

The Dark Knight was a frightening, thrilling, brilliantly conceptualised masterpiece that shows Superman, Spider-Man and the rest of them how it should be done.
 
:hoboj:well i'll start off by saying as much as i hated the look ,act and overall apperance of Heath's joker,as much as i told many different people on how bad the joker looked and ect. i just have to say I'M SORRY:csad:...heath made that movie for me,oscar worthy..no,not quite but it was a great performance i was actually amazed on how he played joker.

now onto my review .Very good movie it really didnt feel like a comic book movie at all,(until i saw a man dressed as abat:oldrazz:).pacing was a little much but good.They really found time for every character to have screentime and for you to feel for them:example is when Gordan is supposedly killed by joker and out of nowhere he just pops out i and MANY others in the theater clapped like kids.
i dont really like typeing this much so i'll just say it was a very good movie BUT didn't live up to the huge hype it had.oh and if Heaths performance deserves oscar mention than so does two face's actor(aaron somthing ,i forget)he was great as well.
so 8/10!!:hoboj:
 
i must just say this...because i completely forgot to mention it.

i checked this out on imax last night..... and at the very first shot of the city i could here loads of people say "holy ****!", gasp and/or start nervous laughing. that legitimately happened too.
 
Awesome movie.

"Im gonna make this pencil disappear..." *BOOM*

"Taaaadaaaa!"


I miss Heath Ledger already.


Solid 10/10!
 
I've just seen it the second time and the theater room was absolutely packed and I haven't seen that in years in Bucharest. Truth be told it was in one of the most popular cinemas in town and it was in the evening but still. People clapped and really enjoyed the movie. It was a pretty good atmosphere. :)

I'm going again tomorow.
 
1) BubbaGump, Kalleo, kez1984, Not_Sane, undomiel.


You guys want to see a magic trick?

j/k :oldrazz:
 
THE DARK KNIGHT

The Dark Knight,is the second film in the revitalised Batman franchise, based upon one of the most famous comic book characters of all time. Having been one of the most aggressively marketed films of the decade, this movie is near impossible to avoid. And with the death of one it’s stars, Heath Ledger, just recently, his performance is inevitably going to be overrated. After a string of disappointing movies so far this year, The Dark Knight promised to be the exception, but never managed to deliver.

Christian Bale is Bruce Wayne, billionaire by day, caped crusader Batman by night. Having been clearing up the streets for a while, District Attorney Harvey Dent(Aaron Eckhart) has begun to prosecute the mobs, but the appearance of a new villain, the bizarrely strange and psychotic Joker(Heath Ledger), leads to anarchy and destruction on a large scale.

First off, Christian Bale gives an all time worst performance, constantly vague as Bruce Wayne, leaving no impact, and hinging his entire performance as Batman on making his voice overly gruff and nothing more, the result is the main protagonist being possibly the worst part of the entire movie. Heath Ledger’s performance on the other hand is the highlight, whilst not as fantastic as the hype would have you believe, his body language an expression gives an edge to the character, whilst the script completely fails to give life to him.

From a perspective of writing, The Dark Knight is a poor specimen indeed. Batman Begins was notorious for it’s lack of dialogue in favour of speeches and quips, and the recursion of the same few lines a ridiculous number of times, however the Nolan Brothers seem to have learnt nothing since, and we are left with the exact same sloppy writing again. Every line is either a quick smart remark like joke, or a monologue pointed in another characters general direction, leaving no real interaction between protagonists. Instead, we are left with lots of quotable lines, but a lack of substance, the typical third rate Hollywood script, drenched in cliché.

Christopher Nolan direction is marginally more interesting that Batman Begins, as he decides to use a bit more camera movement instead of relying entirely on filters to create atmosphere. Whilst it doesn’t add anything to the meaning of any sequences of frames, the movement does make scenes that would otherwise be boring, due to the terrible screenplay, a little more interesting. However this is not enough at all, and several times we find ourselves tracking around the subject of a scene in circles for far too long without good cause. Sloppy directing, offering little if anything, highly indistinct and pretty much your basic action film which could have been directed by one of hundreds of third rate directors.

The feel of this movie is very empty, substance and rich content has been replaced by references and cheap laughs, rather than the actual building and construction of the characters and environments, being far too eager to move on to the next action sequence, leaves the movie completely hollow and void of any real emotion as we never get a chance to engage with any of the characters. Rather than a dark brooding comic book film, the whole movie feels more like a poor ‘Bond’ film, with the focus on gadgets and action, without any integrity, with Batman even travelling to the far East in pure Bond like fashion. The main character could easily be replaced by any generic action hero, and the result would be pretty much the same.

As for the key selling point of the film, the Joker, his handling is the cause of the vague nature of the film. The Joker’s ‘random craziness’ and lack of playing by the rules makes the whole movie fail to have a point, whilst I suspect this was intended, the choice to make it such was a big mistake, as you never can get into the film or any of the characters, the first fifteen minutes being the best. The Dark Knight happens in front of you, with lots of events, but there never seems to be a point or substance, making the experience dull at best.

In conclusion, The Dark Knight fails to be anything special whatsoever, consigning itself to being a cliché Hollywood action film, without any edge. Of course, the film will make money, as with most marketing campaigns, and of course, there will be many people who claim this film is of a high quality, of course, if you’re into stereotype, pointless action and cliché, then sure, this film is for you, but if you expect something with depth and purpose, that fulfils you as a viewer, look elsewhere. Another hugely disappointing movie, one to miss.
 
Man,I was let down with this film.
Heath Ledger's performance of Joker was good,but Oscar worthy? I think they're pushin that a bit, especially since he died (no disrespect to the fellow,RIP).

It was good,I'm not denyin that,but nowhere near as much as the hype made it out to be, in my opinion.

I was bored quite a lot, loud explosions,gunshots & killings don't necessarily make a good film. The part where Joker tells Batman where Harvey is & where Rachel is,I could see that double cross, that was predictable, it's expected with Joker as he isn't all what he seems.

Solid 7/10 though,I thought Iron Man was much better.
Oh,and if they're still considerin goin with the mob route as they have the past 2 films and introduce new villains,I think they should go with The Ventriloquist & Scarface in the next one.
Depends how realistic he is though - heck,they made Two Face work :yay:
I'll actually agree with this point. I'm not sure if the movie lived upto the hype,then again most movies dont.. I'll admit I was half tired when I saw this movie,and so thats might be part of my let down..
I just felt it was slow in parts,and some scenes were just thrown together. I hated the whole vigilante/scarecrow scene,that was kindof terrible..Bales dark batman voice got annoying real quick at the beginning of the movie,though it tapered down as it went on..
Though not Oscar worthy,I think Ledgers acting of the Joker was well done. I'd give his take on the Joker a little better than Jacks version,but not by much. He was demonic and evil,and thought he lifted the film when he was in it...The new actress for Rachel was the biggest disappointment for me,she just looked so god aweful. Arron Echart(sp) did a good job as Harvey Dent,and I was at odds on how they made Two-Face looked.
Overall,a good movie,despite my little annoyances I listed. I'm just not sure its the best movie(action) of the year so far..Its a close one between TDK,and Ironman...
*i may go see this again when I get time,and more sleep though I havent seen a movie twice in a long long time...
 
I saw it a third time today. Each time I watch it I like the ending even more.
 
It's excellently written. The whole movie slowly builds towards those final shots, and the message behind it defines why Batman is such an iconic character.
 
First of all, what the hell happened to Gotham? All of the sudden it looks so fresh, new and modern. Nothing like we saw in Batman Begins. Sure, Batman is taking down criminals, but let's get real Gotham's look wouldn't change so drastically.

Nolan cut away from SO many scenes without showing us what happened, and some of the scenes were just ridiculous.

The opening scene with the bank robbery? EPIC. Such an amazing entrance for the Joker.

The next scene with Scarecrow and Batman? TERRIBLE. The action was cut up so bad we couldn't tell what the hell was going on.

Then the scene in the courtroom introducing Dent. Guy pulls a gun on him and he calmly takes it and punches him in the face? Come on.

The scene with Joker and his clowns showing up at the charity event. He drops Rachel out the window, Batman saves her...but then just leaves the Joker and his goons up there with all those people? Not to mention her line right after they hit the car was completely ludicrous. "Let's not do that again." Christ almighty.

The scene with Bruce driving the Lambo and taking the hit happened so fast I could barely register what happened there either. Then what happened after that? Everyone just went back to their daily grind, drinking coffee and reading the newspaper?

How about the part when Two-Face shoots the driver in the head and flies onto its roof. Did he even think before doing that? What happened to the Italian dude? How did Two-Face survive that? Come on Nolan. SHOW US.

And now to the big deal, and what I feel tarnishes the epic moral battle that took place within batman and between him and joker. *beep* the film was so good up until they ruined it by showing two-faces', well, 2nd face.

Like I said, Nolan has cemented his Batman franchise as grounded and real, up until we see the cartoon come to life in two-face and his ridiculous in tact eye ball after nearly being burned alive. IF Nolan HAD to show this, they should have had just burned skin where his eye was, that would have been more convincing and less ridiculous looking, despite what he looked like in the comic. Nolan's creative decision here was terrible.

Now to the even worse part about two-face. In the comic he is schizophrenic, and has anger issues all along. We see none of this even hinted at until Rachel dies. Sure, it was traumatizing. But expecting Eckhart to be able to handle such a daunting task at being convincing of this was asking way too much and it shows. His acting was forced and ridiculous at the end, suddenly becoming a cold blooded killer with tourettes syndrome at the flip of a coin. By the point where he flips in a coin in that town car, and shoots the driver instead I about had enough and had almost completely forgotten the amazing film between Joker and Batman and Gotham I had seen before it.

We should have never seen that side of two-face. Nolan should have left the bandages on. We know he got burned. We know what's coming. That scene with him and the Joker in the hospital was so well done, just imagine if he still had his bandages on. That was the BEGINNING of the Joker turning his "white knight" into his "dark knight." That should have been the last time we saw Dent. Nolan could have set up a 3rd installment PERFECTLY, but instead decided to kill off two-face after Joker's incredible speech he gave about dent while hanging upside down facing batman. What a perfect ending that would have been cross-cutting between Joker's dialogue and Eckhart in the hospital with the bandages still on...stewing, brewing, taking in everything Joker had said to him, looking at the gun, gripping it tightly...a new monster BEGINNING, not happening overnight like we saw. Even showing him getting out of the hospital bed, tearing off his IVs and storming out with the gun in his hand would have made a huge impact and been very effective I think, especially while cutting back and forth to the Joker.

The Joker blows the hospital up, but Dent lives? Nolan didn't show us that either. Then two-face goes on his ridiculous revenge killing spree like he's killed a dozen before. The film suddenly becomes about a character we were just introduced to and his need for revenge, and literally leaves the incredible work by Ledger hanging. Two-face was so unconvincing (partly because of how ridiculous he looked,) and again because we never saw a hint of this side of him like we should have.

Nolan simply got carried away at the end. Overall, I'd give the film an 7.9-8.2/10.

Anyone comparing this film to Godfather and the like and calling it the best film of the decade are insane. The immense amount of hyperbole in this thread is really kind of annoying.
 
There's a purpose why we don't see some things. Everything has a purpose. Just look at Memento and The Prestige, Chris Nolan also tells his stories through editing. The Dark Knight is no exception. Think about the themes and characters you're dealing with. Think a bit more about it, and you'll see why it's edited like it's edited. I don't know why people think The Matrix is so deep and philosophycal, but won't bother thinking one more second about The Dark Knight. Dammit. Chris Nolan is ahead of his time, he really did something special with these comic book characters. The structure of the story / script is so complex, yet it seems simple. Chris Nolan's masterpiece!

P.S.: A second view might help understand the movie better.
 
Nolan doesn't know how to edit nor does he know how to direct martial arts action sequences.

Only Memento was his best work--a fluke, like M. Night Shaymalan. All his other movies gets worse with each passing.

This film was on par with The Happening.
 
Oh ****. You clearly didn't get it. You didn't get the flick, and didn't get what I was saying. Did you actually read my friggin' post? Meh...
 
Zero, what was it that made the action hard for you to follow? I'll admit, it wasn't so great at times in Begins, but I thought it never faltered in TDK.
 
Yeah, but the fact is, I wasn't even talking about action scenes (which were great)... LOL
 
The same knee-em and jerk-em elbow manuever.

Bring some Chinese special effects for the fighting, if you don't know how.

I want Fearless action. Not **** like this.
 
And we have Matrix-style action scenes that are invading Hollywood. No, thanks! I like it rough, violent, fast. The fights scenes had a lot of impact in The Dark Knight, BUT - I wasn't even talking about action scenes in this post:

There's a purpose why we don't see some things. Everything has a purpose. Just look at Memento and The Prestige, Chris Nolan also tells his stories through editing. The Dark Knight is no exception. Think about the themes and characters you're dealing with. Think a bit more about it, and you'll see why it's edited like it's edited. I don't know why people think The Matrix is so deep and philosophycal, but won't bother thinking one more second about The Dark Knight. Dammit. Chris Nolan is ahead of his time, he really did something special with these comic book characters. The structure of the story / script is so complex, yet it seems simple. Chris Nolan's masterpiece!

P.S.: A second view might help understand the movie better.
 
Nolan doesn't know how to edit nor does he know how to direct martial arts action sequences.

Only Memento was his best work--a fluke, like M. Night Shaymalan. All his other movies gets worse with each passing.

This film was on par with The Happening.

Silly troll. It must suck to have a half empty glass of milk. And your idea of a good film is...?
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,777
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"