The End of the World

So...about this end-of-the-world thing.

Do any of you actually own any fall-out shelters?

I live a mile from the Port of Los Angeles, I am doomed anyways. Might as well accept my oblivion and pray for an afterlife. :D
 
Sarcasm and laughing hyena prattle isn't what it's about.
I said I seek what is right, and I admire those who have blazed a path before us. Claiming to be right wouldn't automatically make me right, but neither does ridicule make others right. Many times I've attempted to share some thoughts with those who gather in forums, but it always ends the same way...pearls before swine.
Ok. Ignorance is bliss, and mocking laughter echoes loudly in hollow minds. I prefer to continue learning, not wasting time and bandwidth. Outta here.
That's funny...I'd forgotten about this whole thing. Seems like you're the one hanging into it (so much so that you sent me a PM over it). If you want a serious debate, fine. Start putting your evidence where your mouth is. :up:

Don't just come in here and proclaim that you're some persecuted messiah with the answers and then fail to deliver. We've got open minds here (for the most part); make a serious effort if you expect results.
 
That's funny...I'd forgotten about this whole thing. Seems like you're the one hanging into it (so much so that you sent me a PM over it). If you want a serious debate, fine. Start putting your evidence where your mouth is. :up:

Don't just come in here and proclaim that you're some persecuted messiah with the answers and then fail to deliver. We've got open minds here (for the most part); make a serious effort if you expect results.

Yeah, I pm'd ya during the time I was pm'ing someone else.
If you want to see some of my serious effort, go to DamonElkins.com
Note that I took my work to a professional astronomer who advised that my proposed path of Nibiru works. Also, note that I've not only done due diligence but have also created graphics to illustrate. Ancient evidence and modern science corroborate my story which goes further than both of them.
You do not have an open mind (no matter how much you claim that you do). All you want is for someone else to prove what you haven't taken the time to research for yourself. All the while, you wish to denigrate and make yourself appear "smarter" than they are by sarcasm and goading.
Won't work with me. Been there and done that and have not the time to do your work for you. If you are open minded and truly serious about learning, you will adjust your attitude and soften your words. Not holding my breath for that.
 
Yeah, I pm'd ya during the time I was pm'ing someone else.
If you want to see some of my serious effort, go to DamonElkins.com
Note that I took my work to a professional astronomer who advised that my proposed path of Nibiru works. Also, note that I've not only done due diligence but have also created graphics to illustrate. Ancient evidence and modern science corroborate my story which goes further than both of them.
You do not have an open mind (no matter how much you claim that you do). All you want is for someone else to prove what you haven't taken the time to research for yourself. All the while, you wish to denigrate and make yourself appear "smarter" than they are by sarcasm and goading.
Won't work with me. Been there and done that and have not the time to do your work for you. If you are open minded and truly serious about learning, you will adjust your attitude and soften your words. Not holding my breath for that.
Yeah, because I have a whole lot of time to research this for myself while trying to earn higher degrees in a completely different field. I'm just lazy. :whatever:

How can I have an open mind when you had not, up to this point, given me anywhere to look? That's all I asked.

...and for somebody who's, "been there," and, "done that," and said he was leaving, you sure were quick to respond to my post. :up:
 
"This site is created as of December 2005 to propose a path of the missing planet which is redundantly corroborated by ancient sources and validated by modern science. Expansion of this site is forthcoming."

Yeah. Went through and looked at the site, and found nothing that makes an argument for or against the theories of the beginnings of the universe. :huh:

What exactly is your argument with me, pal? In your PM, you alluded to a completely different argument (pertaining to the origins building-blocks of life). Everything I see on your site has nothing to do with that.

On the other hand, I have no argument against what's been posted on your site. Not my field, and for all I know everything there is 100% water-tight. It's an interesting read.

...so, again...where's the evidence of some alternate beginning of matter and, ultimately, life? That's where my interest lies. Everything else is speculation that I'm happy to listen to. Don't lump me into some group because I happened to laugh at somebody's comment. You don't know me nearly as well as you think you do.
 
Yeah. Went through and looked at the site, and found nothing that makes an argument for or against the theories of the beginnings of the universe. :huh:

What exactly is your argument with me, pal? In your PM, you alluded to a completely different argument (pertaining to the origins building-blocks of life). Everything I see on your site has nothing to do with that.

On the other hand, I have no argument against what's been posted on your site. Not my field, and for all I know everything there is 100% water-tight. It's an interesting read.

...so, again...where's the evidence of some alternate beginning of matter and, ultimately, life? That's where my interest lies. Everything else is speculation that I'm happy to listen to. Don't lump me into some group because I happened to laugh at somebody's comment. You don't know me nearly as well as you think you do.

One last post to you.
All the chit-chat here about Mayan calendar and what might happen in 2,012, DNA of mankind, evolution versus intelligent design, etc. can best be explained by one overarching story. That story is the one reported by Sitchin as told by ancient high civilizations. My proposed path of Nibiru is one link in the chain which has been denied and denigrated but which seems to be solidly founded. If it is true, then the rest of the story has a better chance of being found true also. That story is that the Anunnaki came to Earth, modified the DNA of an existing hominoid to bring about mankind, and left evidence of their presence here via megalithic structures at Baalbek/Jerusalem/Stonehenge/Egyptian pyramids/etc. Ample evidence also supports their knowledge of the galaxy, Solar System, and Earth's precession/dimensions/etc. The building blocks were ascribed by the Anunnaki to a "Creator Over All", followed by some evolution, followed by some intelligent intervention on their part as emissaries of that creator.

In short, the story told by Sitchin in his dozen or more books (while not perfect) is IMHO the most likely scenario which can be used to explain much of the otherwise disconnected dots being discussed here.

I know you. Have seen dozens who attack and deny before they study the evidence. All too common.

Now, you can color me gone...no need to comment to this or denigrate it further. Laugh yourself silly.
 
It is quite evident that some people are reluctant to let go of false beliefs that were preached to them as fact, while they were brought up. It's a false sense of security that will prevent them from going anywhere.
 
Ever where you look up, the end of the world is always tied to god one way or another.
 
you can find a way to relate god to any story you hear , it doesnt mean the deity belongs there.
 
you can find a way to relate god to any story you hear , it doesnt mean the deity belongs there.


You are talking about making something up, and implying things. I am talking about actual historical references in the Hindu Religion, Islam, Buddhist, Zoroastrian etc...
 
There really isn't any selection pressure to have the chance to improve, since most variants of the genome reproduce due to that lack of pressure. We will live longer for sure, as over time medical science improves, but we won't change unless there is a radical change to our environment. Then we will suffer until stability is again achieved, and any improvements will be based on what new environ predicates.



That will not change the gene pool though since the strong reproduce as much as the weak.


Even if there isn't a radical change in our environment, I'm sure that as time progresses we will become stronger & capable of even better strength, speed, or endurance feats. Humans are already capable of becoming truly strong, I don't see why we wouldn't become stronger as millions of years pass by.

Btw, how come only kids up to the age of 10 can regenerate the tip of any finger that is cut off? I think it'd be pretty sweet if all humans could regenerate lost limbs or organs.
 
One last post to you.
All the chit-chat here about Mayan calendar and what might happen in 2,012, DNA of mankind, evolution versus intelligent design, etc. can best be explained by one overarching story. That story is the one reported by Sitchin as told by ancient high civilizations. My proposed path of Nibiru is one link in the chain which has been denied and denigrated but which seems to be solidly founded. If it is true, then the rest of the story has a better chance of being found true also. That story is that the Anunnaki came to Earth, modified the DNA of an existing hominoid to bring about mankind, and left evidence of their presence here via megalithic structures at Baalbek/Jerusalem/Stonehenge/Egyptian pyramids/etc. Ample evidence also supports their knowledge of the galaxy, Solar System, and Earth's precession/dimensions/etc. The building blocks were ascribed by the Anunnaki to a "Creator Over All", followed by some evolution, followed by some intelligent intervention on their part as emissaries of that creator.

In short, the story told by Sitchin in his dozen or more books (while not perfect) is IMHO the most likely scenario which can be used to explain much of the otherwise disconnected dots being discussed here.

I know you. Have seen dozens who attack and deny before they study the evidence. All too common.

Now, you can color me gone...no need to comment to this or denigrate it further. Laugh yourself silly.

Haha, you've got quite the imagination on you. Evidence, or you're lying your ass off.
 
Even if there isn't a radical change in our environment, I'm sure that as time progresses we will become stronger & capable of even better strength, speed, or endurance feats. Humans are already capable of becoming truly strong, I don't see why we wouldn't become stronger as millions of years pass by.

We will, and have gotten somewhat more robust, but not via evolution, but via medical science and general improvements in living standards. We really are the same as we were a quarter of a million years ago, just more clothed. :D
 
There are MANY sources that point to something significant happening in 2012. ie: Sumerian Scripture, Nubian ruins, Hindu religion, Aztec Calender...
 
When 2012 comes and goes and were still alive can we finally drop the Mayan calendar crap and file it in the same vein as the Y2K scare?
 
There are MANY sources that point to something significant happening in 2012. ie: Sumerian Scripture, Nubian ruins, Hindu religion, Aztec Calender...

Yeah. What's you point? What's might happen is (and I'm gonna indulge in my pseudo scientific sci-fi side a bit here) perhaps, a sort of 'awakening,' something epic, but nothing like a planet nearing Earth.

Go read up on Project Serpo, and you'll see what I'm talking about.
 
It is quite evident that some people are reluctant to let go of false beliefs that were preached to them as fact, while they were brought up. It's a false sense of security that will prevent them from going anywhere.
Yeah. Shame on me for believing in evolution and following the evidence that suggests that the spontaneous generation of life-building complex molecules is plausible.

:dry:
 
One last post to you.
All the chit-chat here about Mayan calendar and what might happen in 2,012, DNA of mankind, evolution versus intelligent design, etc. can best be explained by one overarching story. That story is the one reported by Sitchin as told by ancient high civilizations. My proposed path of Nibiru is one link in the chain which has been denied and denigrated but which seems to be solidly founded. If it is true, then the rest of the story has a better chance of being found true also. That story is that the Anunnaki came to Earth, modified the DNA of an existing hominoid to bring about mankind, and left evidence of their presence here via megalithic structures at Baalbek/Jerusalem/Stonehenge/Egyptian pyramids/etc. Ample evidence also supports their knowledge of the galaxy, Solar System, and Earth's precession/dimensions/etc. The building blocks were ascribed by the Anunnaki to a "Creator Over All", followed by some evolution, followed by some intelligent intervention on their part as emissaries of that creator.

In short, the story told by Sitchin in his dozen or more books (while not perfect) is IMHO the most likely scenario which can be used to explain much of the otherwise disconnected dots being discussed here.

I know you. Have seen dozens who attack and deny before they study the evidence. All too common.

Now, you can color me gone...no need to comment to this or denigrate it further. Laugh yourself silly.
O...kay. So, by loose association, if one part of the story is true, then the rest (according to your earlier posts) is the solid truth.

Wow. By that logic, the Christian Bible is infallible. In fact, that logic isn't very logical at all. That means that conflicting stories with certain elements of truth are all true, despite being completely at-odds with one another.

I'm not denying, or attacking: I'm just debating. The only thing I ever did in relation to you was ask for evidence, and I just happened to laugh at another poster's comment. You somehow think from all that that you know me? Yeah, pal. You're the all-knowing messiah. :whatever:

I'm sorry you got all ********* by another poster's comments, but I really don't see what that has to do with me.
 
There are MANY sources that point to something significant happening in 2012. ie: Sumerian Scripture, Nubian ruins, Hindu religion, Aztec Calender...
Here's the thing: even if something does happen that's completely unrelated to the Mayan calendar, something that doesn't spell doom or something that isn't even that major, the followers of that theory are going to proclaim that the Mayans were right. There's really no way to show them wrong (if, in fact, they are...I'm not making a claim one way or another).
 
There are MANY sources that point to something significant happening in 2012. ie: Sumerian Scripture, Nubian ruins, Hindu religion, Aztec Calender...


MAYAN calender...

EDit:

or the Aztecs choose that year to?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"