We are so not turning the Muppet thread into political thread.
As far as this issue pertains to the new movie: the only "anti-" message in this movie is an anti-please-don't-tear-down-our-theater message.
Yes, the bad guy is a rich oil baron. But he's not a bad guy because he's a rich oil baron. He's a bad guy because he's a jerk. He not only takes delight in the fact that he's going to destroy the Muppet studios, he's also planning to take over their copyright and replace them hoodlum versions of the Muppets. He raps about gold-plating his own cat.
For the purposes of this story, yes, he's an oil guy. It's not the first or last time a lovable gang of children's characters is threatened by an evil rich businessman. Hell, the original Muppet Movie has essentially the same story involving an evil restaurant chain owner.
The Muppets is so taken from the old "let's put on a show" movies from the 1930s that Mickey Rooney himself actually has a cameo during one of the songs.
At no point in the movie does anyone proclaim that drilling for oil is bad other than that doing so will destroy the beloved Muppets theater. No one in the movie discusses alternative energy.
Think of Tex like Mr. Potter from
It's a Wonderful Life.. He wasn't a bad guy because he was rich or owned a bank. He was a bad guy because he was a slumlord who nearly drives George Bailey to suicide because he's hiding the $8000 that George lost.
That's as bad as watching Tex Richman try to cut the power at the Muppet theater because they might make the money they need to save the theater.
The message of both of those movies is that no one is a failure as long as they have family and friends, and anyone who takes anything sinister out of either of those movies clearly wasn't paying attention.