Matt said:The Frighteners:
Good: Had Michael J. Fox
Bad: Erm...everything else.
Yayness! Someone who agrees with me!Flexo said:Hey, The Frighteners rocked hard.![]()
kol_lover said:I think alot of people loved The Frighteners! I'm probably wrong but isn't it a cult classic?
And I don't think Jackson did Lawnmower Man.
Huh? The Hobbit's not dark04nbod said:sam raimi- can he do dark? i mean that dark- not spidey dark. I was not a fan of spiderman or the sequel. this is extremely disappointing news. and this is the guy that gave us the tv series- young hercules!
04nbod said:yes it is- its at least as dark as the lord of the rings in tone if not in subject matter. i hope he keeps the style consistant.
DACrowe said:P.S. To those who say that Jackson is more suitable because he has proven himself with the source material:
well keep in mind that before LOTR Jackson gave us the average Dead Alive movies (below Evil Dead), the awful Frighteners and what was mediocre in Lawnmower Man (I think that was him, though don't quote me).
Raimi has shown more versatility before SM and his ego hasn't ballooned from the Spider-Man movies, while Jackson's since LOTR obviously has.
Don't say anymore! I haven't read the book.04nbod said:gollum and the caves- the dragon- the trolls trying to eat them- i call that dark
jimmylace said:just look at "simple plan", then look at "army of darkness", or "spider-man 2" the guy knows how to hit all of the beats
Wow these people come out of hats?? that id like to seeThe Amazing Lee said:Jackson and Raimi came out of the same hat....so, yeah it'd be interesting to see Sam Raimi's take.