Was Karloff's monster in "Frankenstein" not a real character?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
You want to talk pollution? Let's compare the TV series to Ang Lee's masterpiece:
1) The Hulk didn't vehemently stare at moss throughout the series
2) The Hulk stayed one constant height and didn't grow to Mighty Joe Young proportions while looking completely unrelatable to humans at the same time
3) Banner didn't try to strangle women
4) Banner's last name wasn't Krenzler
5) Banner's dad wasn't the Absorbing Man
6) Banner's dad didn't turn into a gigantic jellyfish cloud at the end
7) The first hour of the pilot didn't have people yawning and counting the light switches in the room
8) At no point in the series did a poodle turn green and attack
9) The Hulk didn't look pudgy
10) Foam didn't stop the Hulk and no one died in a bizarre, freeze-frame, campy death scene.
If the TV series was "pollution", then Ang Lee's Hulk was genocide.
t: Let's!
(Don't get me wrong...the Ang Lee movie was pretty bad...but not that bad!)On that I'm with others in thinking taking the best elements from both movies would make for a much better and more successful film, though giving the Hulk a proper personality of his own (and that is a must for me) has yet to even be attempted in any of the 3 live action versions. God knows why the producers/writers/directors keep wimping out on that![]()
Did the Frankenstein monster talk in the original book? Did he have a personality that was completely taken away in that movie?
I saw an episode where the Hulk hit his calf muscle, etc., etc., ad nauseam
Yep...much better than the Ang Lee movie.
Quite a few fans seems to agree that the Hulk should not be a real character in his own movie. The vocal minority judging from the box office.
)Now that's the Hulk I grew up with![]()
Yet the TV show went to a fifth season while the Ang Lee movie lasted one weekend before taking one of the biggest 2nd weekend drop-offs around.
I know you hate to admit it, but the TV show had more fans than the movie.
You need to look at all of the changes you mentioned from the TV show that had to do with the Hulk's powers in context: In comics, the Hulk is the strongest. In the TV show, the Hulk was the strongest in that universe. He didn't lift an aircraft carrier because there was never a need for that in the show. The TV show Hulk never tried a feat of strength and failed. Everything he attempted to do, he succeeded.
In Ang Lee's movie, we have Bruce strangling Betty and the Hulk growing to ridiculous heights. And, wow, the Hulk said TWO words versus Lou saying none.
Your complaints about the TV show were things you didn't like (cheesy music, camera shots, Lou flexing, no speaking).
MY complaints about Ang Lee's Hulk were changing the fundamentals of the character, himself (Bruce harming Betty, Absorbing-Dad, Change-O Hulk height, Bruce saying he LIKES losing control and becoming the Hulk in the trailer...AND still no speaking).
But it really begs the question...why are we beating this dead horse about a show that's been off the air for almost 30 years and a cinematic abortion that most of us would require a mind-enema to forget about in the middle of a Mark Ruffalo/Avengers thread? You and I will never agree on matters of the TV show and Ang Lee, so why subject everyone else to our pi$$ing contest?
So I guess you're not going to answer my question.
Yet the TV show went to a fifth season while the Ang Lee movie lasted one weekend before taking one of the biggest 2nd weekend drop-offs around.
I know you hate to admit it, but the TV show had more fans than the movie.
You need to look at all of the changes you mentioned from the TV show that had to do with the Hulk's powers in context: In comics, the Hulk is the strongest. In the TV show, the Hulk was the strongest in that universe. He didn't lift an aircraft carrier because there was never a need for that in the show. The TV show Hulk never tried a feat of strength and failed. Everything he attempted to do, he succeeded.
In Ang Lee's movie, we have Bruce strangling Betty and the Hulk growing to ridiculous heights. And, wow, the Hulk said TWO words versus Lou saying none.
But it really begs the question...why are we beating this dead horse about a show that's been off the air for almost 30 years and a cinematic abortion that most of us would require a mind-enema to forget about in the middle of a Mark Ruffalo/Avengers thread? You and I will never agree on matters of the TV show and Ang Lee, so why subject everyone else to our pi$$ing contest?
Do they?
Lol, well I certainly aint one of them.
And yes, I think the Box Office does say a lot about what the GA might actually want from a Hulk film. Perhaps a film that is as much about the character of the Hulk as it is about Banner (crazy idea I know).
Think they have maybe seen enough of the grunting plot device turning up for 5 to 10 minutes a few times each flick, so why not try something that has been doing very well for the last 50 years in the books? (another crazy idea..)
We do somewhat agree about the Ang Lee movie though. Pretty sucktastic that.

So anyway, how 'bout that Mark Ruffalo...
t:
t:
I've been a fan of his for a while...so I'm probably biased. Best Banner ever?![]()
I've never seen him in anything, what's he been in?

Holy smokes! That's not bad!For you older dudes, he'd be a good Columbo.
I'm thinking we'll be getting a nother Hulk film following the Avengers. The Avengers will probably set it up.
