Spider-Bite
Superhero
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 7,988
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Preemptive is a nice word to throw around. How much longer can you realistically give a country that has been told by the world at large to stop doing something and they keep doing it anyway? How long do you give them to keep pushing through illegal acts and getting closer and closer to nuclear weapons before you finally show them that you aren't just full of hot air?
How long do you let the bully poke you before you finally throw a punch?
That is how these people get where they are now, they rely on the spineless to plea bargain, and beg and offer for them to stop doing the wrong thing. They push it to the point where they are just about to get stung and then they back off and apologize and say they will never do it again. Then they start doing it again in secret, untill someone finds out, then they let it play and let it play and let it play till they get to the point of getting stung and then they back off and apologize etc etc etc.
They play people's emotions like fiddles. Because they don't follow the rules and know that we will. So they do what they want and laugh as the American people make their government less and less powerfull and they get what they want anyway.
How many truces must we sign and then watch as the enemy on the brink of defeat restocks and rearms themselves to fight again at full strength a few years down the road only to waste precious lives and resources untill they get on the brink of defeat and sign another truce so they can rebuild their strength?
There is a word for people who let someone else walk all over them again and again. It's "Sucker"
There is also a word for people who rush into war, when other options have not been eliminated.
Foolhardy.
The problem is that invading Iran wont change any of the negative realities of the current situation. You think war with Iran will cause the U.S. to stop getting poked, or poked a lot more? You think war with Iran wont cost resources and lives? Of course it will cost a lot more. And look at Iraq. Iran would be Iraq times 10. And we don't have the 10 to throw at it.
War usually leads to more war. violence begets violence, and not peace. War with Iraq made war with Iran much more likely, and war with Iran will only help the Iraqi conflict between the Shiites and Sunnis spread throughout the middle east. War with Iran will not end with Iran. It would spread. It would be an all out World War 3 involving Iraq, Iran, Lebannon, Israel, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and more. And North Korea would see this as the perfect opportunity while we are weakened to try and take over South Korea. Remember several of those middle eastern countries I mentioned already have nuclear weapons.
War with Iran could trigger a chain of events causing the end of the world, and there are so many emotions deeply invested in the end of the world prophecies that state a war between Israel and Muslim nations will be the war to end all wars, and either Jesus or the great Mesiah will return on the last day and take all those who fought on the correct side of the Holy war to heaven, leaving everyone else to wait as the earth is consumed by Hell.
The fact that so many Christains and Muslims all over the world invest so much into that belief only makes it more likely to happen.


