IRAN'S TOP CLERIC DENOUNCES ELECTION RESULTS
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/13/iran-demonstrations-viole_n_215189.html
![]()
Supporters of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his main political rival attended demonstrations at separate locations in Tehran on Tuesdayin the wake of last week's disputed presidential election.
While pro-Ahmadinejad crowds descended on Vali Asr Square in central Tehran, Mir Hossein Moussavi urged his own supporters to cancel their plans to rally at the square after mass protests a day earlier in which seven people were reportedly killed.
Instead, his supporters gathered at a different location in Tehran, according to video footage of the rally.
Iran's government banned international journalists from covering election rallies Tuesday and blocked access to some online communication tools.
Reporters for international news outlets, including CNN, could talk about the rallies in their live reports but were not allowed to leave their hotel rooms and offices.
The decision was an apparent reaction to video showing violence at recent demonstrations in support of Moussavi, who is disputing the results of Friday's presidential election.
Iran's government has criticized some of that coverage and the images, describing them as biased.
that the way their police is dealing with these rallys would only make me more violent instead of coming to order. If they can't even pick a new leader without rallys that say the election was unfair and police using violence at them then I don't see Iran getting far.Wait, what are you arguing exactly?
That article only begins to scratch the surface. If Khamenei sees a threat in the council of high clerics he'll just persecute them like he has this past weekend placing many of them under house arrest. His investigation will be just as corrupt as the vote count. I agree with the last paragraph completely though!
IRAN'S TOP CLERIC DENOUNCES ELECTION RESULTS
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/13/iran-demonstrations-viole_n_215189.html
![]()
This is not the THE top guy; he's more like the Senior Dissident Cleric, right?
I don't think he even hold an office, elected or appointed - though about this I'm not as sure. Still he's supposedly a man of influence so maybe he's words will carry weight.
I am contending not of the what if in the past (nor am I trying to justify it), but the what of now.
An honest question is, would a stable Democracy work now? The things I hear and the feeling get is, no. I think the demographic and generational shift won't allow it.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE55F54520090617?sp=trueSecurity forces arrested a pro-reform activist and an editor on Wednesday while a provincial prosecutor warned that those causing unrest faced the death penalty
Now their threatening dissent with the death penalty. Way to go Iran!
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE55F54520090617?sp=true
Iran's opposition Wednesday pledged to continue protests over disputed presidential elections as authorities tightened controls on media, threatening Web sites reporting on the country's worst crisis for decades.
Opposition leader Mir Hossein Moussavi, who claims last week's re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was rigged, called on his supporters to join him on the streets of Tehran Thursday in the latest in a series of demonstrations.
Meanwhile, the country's powerful Revolutionary Guard -- which enforces strict Islamic codes -- said it will prosecute Web sites it accuses of inciting riots, adding to a ban on foreign media reporting on the protests and a block on Internet site such as Facebook or Twitter.
Even as the Guard made its announcement, thousands of Iranians planned to head to Haft-e-Tir Square in central Tehran on Wednesday evening despite a stepped-up government crackdown that has seen people arrested across the country.
Sen. John McCain told CNN Wednesday President Obama's statement that he doesn't want to meddle in the Iranian election controversy sends the wrong message.
"On this issue, I do not believe that the president is taking a leadership that is incumbent upon an American president, which we have throughout modern history, and that is to advocate for human rights and freedom — and free elections are one of those fundamentals," the Arizona Republican told John Roberts on CNN's American Morning.
President Obama Tuesday said that he has deep concerns over the election results in Iran, but stressed that "it's not productive, given the history of U.S.-Iranian relations, to be seen as meddling, the U.S. president meddling in Iranian elections."
McCain disputed that assessment. "We're not meddling in any country's affairs when we call for free and fair elections and the ability of people to exercise their human rights," he said Monday. "And when they disagree with a flawed or corrupt election, as the Iranian people have, [not] to be beaten and even killed in the streets."
With they hair in your avatar, I'm sure you could notAnd Iran, Iran so far away. I just Iran, Iran all night and day. Could not get away.
Here's the now-popular video of an Iranian woman kicking at riot police to stop them from beating on people before the jackasses team up on her...
Bravo to that woman for her metaphorical balls of ****ing steel.
Here's the now-popular video of an Iranian woman kicking at riot police to stop them from beating on people before the jackasses team up on her...
Bravo to that woman for her metaphorical balls of ****ing steel.
They better stay in South Korea.