Originally posted by Mr Parker
Well the bullet would have to stop in mid air and change paths in mid flight and do all these crazy scenarios that are plain absurd,hence thats why its called the magic bullet.![]()
I was asking Wobbly.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Well the bullet would have to stop in mid air and change paths in mid flight and do all these crazy scenarios that are plain absurd,hence thats why its called the magic bullet.![]()
Originally posted by wobbly
MJZ, 'spin' as you put it, is used by both sides of the fence to suit their arguments and always has been. I could argue you spun your inteperatation of that info to make Oswald sound like a great shot after all. Fact is, in all the accounts from experts that I've seen or read on the matter over the years, the majority felt Oswald was not up to the task, often citing those marine records as a basis for that reasoning, and none of the few who did claim he could make the shot had anything to back up their assertion.
But if a genuine and accurate re-enactment has indeed been done that supports the possibility for Oswald being able to perform the shot (I haven't seen one as yet, and this 'Jennings' special hasn't been shown yet in the Uk afaik) and it's been verified by independent experts, then I've got no problems at all conceding that point.
Though until I do see that for myslef I'm still inclined to side with those feel it was beyond him.
And all this of course has sidetracked from and does nothing to address my earlier post that an objective analysis of the physical evidence (film footage, wounds on kennedy and Connolly) discounts the possibility of a lone gunman anyway.
Whether Oswald had the abililty to hit the target or not does not detract from the fact that physical evidence proves the lone gunman theory is impossible.
The BBC version used a computer model based entirely on film and photographic evidence. Using this they created a scale model of the area, car, president and passengers. The models moved exactly as they did on film, when playing out the scenario it showed that a bullet could be fired from the 6th floor through the 2 people in the car.Originally posted by Mr Parker
Exactly.The majority of the experts didnt feel he was up to the task to pull it off based on his marine records.and no,the Peter Jennings re-enactment didnt wasnt at all accurate.Like you said,just like the 1993 PBS frontline special used computer imagery to try and proove it instead of using actual photographs,this special did the same exact thing,so no an accurate re-enactment wasnt done.Like you said,the physical evidence and the film footage discounts the lone gunman theory.
Like you said,physical evidence proves the lone gunman theory is impossible.
Originally posted by kang
The BBC version used a computer model based entirely on film and photographic evidence. Using this they created a scale model of the area, car, president and passengers. The models moved exactly as they did on film, when playing out the scenario it showed that a bullet could be fired from the 6th floor through the 2 people in the car.
Originally posted by kang
Sorry, what makes the "lone gunman theory" impossible?
Originally posted by Super_Surfer
I believe there is a conspiracy because of the large amount of witnesses that were discredited by the Warren Commission, including Abraham(sp?) Zapruder.
Originally posted by Magneto29
"The Men Who Kiled Kennedy" specials on the History Channel were very good. One of them had a guy who did this whole investigation about some french guy who was asked to kill Kennedy but declined. He ended up telling about the three gun-man, one behind the fence. He was also proven by another guy, who paided the gunman by exchanging their drugs, ( the payment for the killing) into cash.
kang said:Sorry, what makes the "lone gunman theory" impossible?
Maurice said:The lone gunman theory is impossible because it relies on the "magic bullet". This single shot could not have caused all the injuries to JFK and Gov. Connally that the Warren Commission says it did. Commission Exhibit 399 (the magic bullet) is not missing enough material to have passed through JFK and Connally. Till the day he died (June 15th 1993), John Connally had more bullet fragments left in his wrist and leg than were missing from CE 399. This is also not counting the fragments that were removed from Connally at Parkland Hospital on November 22nd 1963. The fragments left in Connally alone would have weighed more than what is missing from CE 399. How could a bullet shed more grains of metal from itself than what is missing from it? Simple, it can't. CE 399 (the magic bullet) wasn't even removed from Connally. It was found on some random gurney at Parkland. CE 399 is not missing enough grains of metal to have passed through JFK and Connally. If there is no magic bullet, The Warren Commission's case crumbles.
JLBats said:Why?
WHY?
Why did you bump this...?![]()

