Yeah it's my fault that I see no symbolism or purpose in a young Clark running around in a cape and Jonathan watching. Sorry but it just comes off as a lame and serves no purpose, IMO.
No need to apologize. It just didn't resonate with you for whatever reason. Like The Sage said, "to each their own". I personally thought Shannon's performance as Zod was a little too over-the-top, but a lot of people loved it.
Good gracious this movie is definitely a comic book Superman, I don't know how many times I've heard that certain scenes were either inspired or taken right out of the comic books. I don't read them but seeing the writers and director being inspired by the actual source material and not a previous movie makes me smile. Perhaps this will force people to realize Superman does not equal Richard Donner/Christopher Reeve.
Really. Some people felt that Shannon didn't do enough. Interesting.
Good gracious this movie is definitely a comic book Superman, I don't know how many times I've heard that certain scenes were either inspired or taken right out of the comic books. I don't read them but seeing the writers and director being inspired by the actual source material and not a previous movie makes me smile. Perhaps this will force people to realize Superman does not equal Richard Donner/Christopher Reeve.
this superman has so much potential...
I though his acting was very good and multi-dimensional.
I think Shannon was very good and believable, I liked that he wasn't a stereotypical villain. But I definitely agree that the repeated "I will find him" was over the top. Saying it 3-4x kind of took the intensity out of it.
I thought he was the epitome of a stereotypical villain, but that was Goyer's fault. "I will kill all of these humans you've come to adopt, Kal. I will take all of them from you -- one by one." "Release the gorgon.. err world engine!!" Only thing missing was having him let loose a heinous cackle like Skelator.
My thoughts exactly. The acting was fine, he didn't overshadow Henry like some claimed he would.
But the character was written like a stereotypical villain IMO.
Zod wanted to kill humans just to anger Kal El a the end of the movie after Zod had lost everything. His goal at the beginning was to revive his world which had been destroyed, he was going to kill all humans as a result of trying to revive Krypton, not simply because he was evil. He also showed concern and caring towards Jor El and even hi son for a time; it was only after they refused to see things his way did he turn against them. For me that is not the stereotypical I'm evil just to be evil villain.
I fully believe that you should have Michael Shannon scream at the top of his lungs like a maniac at least once in any project he appears in, he is just that damn intense. Also, I found Shannon's performance to be very believable. He was subdued most of the film (like a soldier should be) but had a temper and would explode with rage and frustration from time to time. At the end of the movie, he just completely loses his mind and becomes a rabid dog. I though his acting was very good and multi-dimensional. I certainly bought him being the supreme commander of the Kryptonian military much more than Terence Stamp (who came across as more of a pompous, arrogant, aristocrat than an actual soldier).
Not sure if anyone else caught the references or not, but I'll throw them out there:
- Superman moving fast and avoiding the gunfire of the military jets in Smallville: "Faster than a speeding bullet".
- Superman getting hit by the train at the end of the Smallville battle: "More powerful than locomotive"
- Superman being able only to leap at first before figuring out how to fly: The super-leap, and the famous "Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound" line.
I wasn't moved either by the Clark cape thingy....I felt emotional and it was a cute gesture considering what he was going to end up being eventually
Umm.. you sort of contradicted yourself??