• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

The Dark Knight The man who laughs: The Joker thread

Do you like the new look for The Joker?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Undecided

  • Kinda, could be better

  • It's the best Joker look ever


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
yea box office. woot! I heard the Joekr was gonna be in TDK, thatlle boost the BO for sure
 
it profited more than twice its cost.......thats pretty good
That's if you take into account ww numbers. Domestic is the most important, because once it reaches overseas, the studio intake gets much more complicated.
 
Batman (1989) = $413,000,000

Spider-Man = $821,000,000 (World)

Pirates 1 = $652,000,000 (World)

Batman Begins = $382,000,000 (World)

"it profited more than twice its cost.......thats pretty good"
- It did not profit more than twice its cost. The gross take was more than double the estimated budget; but that estimated budget most likely, and very conveniently, excluded the advertising and promotional budget.
 
That's if you take into account ww numbers. Domestic is the most important, because once it reaches overseas, the studio intake gets much more complicated.

But considering 370 mil overall plus the DVD sales, its in blockbutser range
 
Batman (1989) = $413,000,000

Spider-Man = $821,000,000 (World)

Pirates 1 = $652,000,000 (World)

Batman Begins = $382,000,000 (World)

and the studio only gets half of that, thats why nowadays they make the most money from DVD sales.
icon14.gif
 
I am curious, does anyone know if IMDB's box office numbers are adjusted for inflation? They have the Batman 89 budget at an estimated $35million with it's worldwide gross take at over $400million. That's ridiculous if those figures are unadjusted 1989 dollars.

- Christopher
 
boxofficemojo.com
they adjust it for inflation but ya gotta give them your soul
 
can someone put all tdk spoilers in tags for me i wasnt around when they where released so missed it
 
Well, a movie doesn't have to be a huge blockbuster to be good.

Indeed. But Noir's argument was that because Batman 89 was a success, the WB gave too much control to Burton, thus resulting in Batman Returns. So, by expert deduction, he has come to the conclusion that because Batman Begins was a success, The Dark Knight is the new Returns.

This argument overlooks the small fact that Tim Burton is not a motion picture director. He is an artistic director. Nolan is a motion picture director who has proven his talent with every film he has made. I picked up Following this weekend, which I had never seen before. A-Mazing.

- Christopher
 
Considering that "Batman Begins" was the eighth highest grossing film in 2005, second highest grossing "Batman" film right behind 89 (which is suprising considering "Batman and Robin" tanked the franchise), achieved first place in national sales and rental charts in October 2005, becoming the top-selling DVD in the fourth quarter of 2005 and grossed $11.36 million in rental revenue...

I would say it was VERY successful.

I think TDK will do MUCH better now that people feel safe again with the franchise.
 
Considering that "Batman Begins" was the eighth highest grossing film in 2005, second highest grossing "Batman" film right behind 89 (which is suprising considering "Batman and Robin" tanked the franchise)
That's with unadjusted numbers though. Scale it to inflation, and BB is under BF (not sure about BR). Which makes it third or fourth in gross.
 
Considering that "Batman Begins" was the eighth highest grossing film in 2005, second highest grossing "Batman" film right behind 89 (which is suprising considering "Batman and Robin" tanked the franchise), achieved first place in national sales and rental charts in October 2005, becoming the top-selling DVD in the fourth quarter of 2005 and grossed $11.36 million in rental revenue...

I would say it was VERY successful.

I think TDK will do MUCH better now that people feel safe again with the franchise.

No no no no...none of that matters, it didnt do 1 bill worldwide so it was hardly successful.:dry:
 
Considering that "Batman Begins" was the eighth highest grossing film in 2005, second highest grossing "Batman" film right behind 89 (which is suprising considering "Batman and Robin" tanked the franchise), achieved first place in national sales and rental charts in October 2005, becoming the top-selling DVD in the fourth quarter of 2005 and grossed $11.36 million in rental revenue...

I would say it was VERY successful.

I think TDK will do MUCH better now that people feel safe again with the franchise.

I agree. And I don't think that Nolan is going to ruin the franchise with his take on the Joker. I think this one will be huge compared to the first considering the established fan base and following, the word of mouth, DVD sales and the fact that Begins used "secondary" villains.
 
No no no no...none of that matters, it didnt do 1 bill worldwide so it was hardly successful.:dry:

And for clarification I do agree that, in light of the circumstances, Begins was a success. I was just using the numbers to point out the flaw in Noir's argument.

- Christopher
 
That's with unadjusted numbers though. Scale it to inflation, and BB is under BF (not sure about BR). Which makes it third or fourth in gross.

whose counting? :cwink: I think its safe to say that Batman is a successful franchise again, to say its not is a bit ignorant.

But I guess we'll find out the REAL popularity will count in TDK.
 
And for clarification I do agree that, in light of the circumstances, Begins was a success. I was just using the numbers to point out the flaw in Noir's argument.

- Christopher

what was his argument?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"