I love Smallville. It's also straight up trash outside of three aspects, one of which you cannot talk about because of the real life implications. But Clark sucked, Lex sucked, and the Kents sucked.
When it comes to Supes adaptations, it's MAWS and S&L,
Though I have an eternal soft spot for Superman II. Zod is my boy and Clark's battle with the trio is my favorite on screen Superman fight. I also really dig Superman vs. the Elite. I've been disenchanted with the 90s DC animated series for a while now, though I do think JLU is peak.
The thing about
Smallvile, is I could forgive it having The Worst Clark (up to that point) if it only had the BEST....anything else:
I didn't like Rosenbaum's monotonous deliveries, but Lex wasn't bad, he just wasn't The Best (John Shea was a better live-action portrayal of post-Crisis Lex, and
Superboy's 2nd Lex, Sherman Howard, was always more menacing, and STAS's Lex was basically The Perfect One).
Erica was totally great but wasn't The Best Lois (Bitsie and Teri both gave Lois more depth, and MAWS Lois has the most personality).
Martha Kent was fine (
Lois & Clark's was far and away The Best).
Jonathan Kent on that show was closed-minded, judgmental trash (once again,
Lois & Clark had the best Jonathan).
Perry White was fine in his brief appearances 'til he hooked up with Martha (Best:
Lois & Clark again by a country mile).
Kara was...not good. (Best: MAWS...until Milly, at least!)
Their version of the rest of the Daily Planet staff was awful (Best Jimmy: MAWS, Best Cat Grant:
Lois & Clark).
And their Jor-El was actually the worst portrayal of Jor-El imaginable OMG.
I guess the only aspect of Supes lore you could say
Smallville did do the best was Lionel Luthor? But considering it's the only Superman property to bother with Lionel Luthor even being a character in the first place, that doesn't win it much points in my book. But John Glover was awesome regardless.