The Amazing Spider-Man The Official ASM Teaser Trailer Thread! - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's a pathetic complaint. seriously. I usually just rub off peoples complaints about Raimi's films because it's their opinion, but that's just stupid. Though, I've heard plenty of other stupid complaints as well.
And what complaint are you talking about. Im refering to the fact that i found some of the humor odd. Charming but odd. I wasnt making a complaint
 
Nobody should be complaining about the cgi this early.
Agreed. Look at the CGI in the S-M3 teaser. That was about a year before the films release. Then, in November we had gotten the theatrical trailer, and the effects were better.
 
Would someone be so kind as to Point Me in the right direction to see the trailer?
 
Do u find someone dancing odd. It seems alot of people felt it was out of place. I just stated i thought him craming his face with a hotdog with the music playing in the back ground to show how happy he is and how grand life is came off ass campy
 
Would someone be so kind as to Point Me in the right direction to see the trailer?

Google. Videos. Updated in the last hour. Gathers videos from every source possible. Basically 'hacking' or 'navigating' the web these days to find things is comically easy.
 
I'm I the only one excited that we finally get to see the story of Mary and Richard Parker and how their deaths affect Peter?I mean I love Raimi's first two films but that aspect was completely ignored.So it's nice that this film won't be redoing just Uncle Ben.I don't know I'm actually liking this direction.Seems Connors works for Oscorp as well.
 
The whole first person shot is crap anyway... not talking about the CGI, about the idea itself. You want to see a movie, not a attraction in Disneyland (and this scene is here just for the so called "3D").

Now, talking about other scenes... look really bad to me. It's like, Ultimate Spider-Man (which I hate) meets Twilight. I was expecting something bad, but not that bad. I loved Webb's first movie, I really like the cast... the problem is Sony.

They're making another crappy comics adaptation to make money, they're making the movie that Raimi doesn't want to make (and Webb accept, because is new in hollywood, he must accept a opportunity like that, Sony knew when they choose Webbe that he would obey and shut up unlike Raimi). More than Sony, the problem is, again, Avi Arad...

I'm a big spidey fan and movie addict, I accept adaptation (as interpretation, another look at the character). But this looks really really bad.

Anyway, I'll stop here, no you can insult me :p
 
No dude the whole scene. ok denie it all u want im a dick head because even though i enjoyed those movies i found some points to be cheesy (rain drops keep falling on my head) . You win im sorry for having a voice. its people like you who ruin this for every1.
 
No dude the whole scene. ok denie it all u want im a dick head because even though i enjoyed those movies i found some points to be cheesy (rain drops keep falling on my head) . You win im sorry for having a voice. its people like you who ruin this for every1.
LMAO, ruined what?! And now you're just overreacting. I'm just saying I think your compalint is stupid. Does that mean you have to agree? No.
 
I'm I the only one excited that we finally get to see the story of Mary and Richard Parker and how their deaths affect Peter?I mean I love Raimi's first two films but that aspect was completely ignored.So it's nice that this film won't be redoing just Uncle Ben.I don't know I'm actually liking this direction.Seems Connors works for Oscorp as well.

That part's awesome. Bio parents (since May and Ben are kinda adoptive) are important no matter what age a child loses them. Never knew mine, still important. So that whole angle? Definitely rocks!
 
The whole first person shot is crap anyway... not talking about the CGI, about the idea itself. You want to see a movie, not a attraction in Disneyland (and this scene is here just for the so called "3D").

This type of film is an entertainment diversion, much like theme park rides. Putting something in there purely for shallow fun is permissible, as long as it's done in moderation, and done well.

Now, talking about other scenes... look really bad to me. It's like, Ultimate Spider-Man (which I hate) meets Twilight. I was expecting something bad, but not that bad. I loved Webb's first movie, I really like the cast... the problem is Sony.

You're talking like you've seen the film, when in actuality you've seen a two minute teaser trailer in low quality.

I'm a big spidey fan and movie addict, I accept adaptation (as interpretation, another look at the character). But this looks really really bad.

I disagree.
 
The whole first person shot is crap anyway... not talking about the CGI, about the idea itself. You want to see a movie, not a attraction in Disneyland (and this scene is here just for the so called "3D").

Now, talking about other scenes... look really bad to me. It's like, Ultimate Spider-Man (which I hate) meets Twilight. I was expecting something bad, but not that bad. I loved Webb's first movie, I really like the cast... the problem is Sony.

They're making another crappy comics adaptation to make money, they're making the movie that Raimi doesn't want to make (and Webb accept, because is new in hollywood, he must accept a opportunity like that, Sony knew when they choose Webbe that he would obey and shut up unlike Raimi). More than Sony, the problem is, again, Avi Arad...

I'm a big spidey fan and movie addict, I accept adaptation (as interpretation, another look at the character). But this looks really really bad.

Anyway, I'll stop here, no you can insult me :p
I hate to break it to ya but thats exactly what Raimi did when he put venom in SM3. He didnt want to but they told him that the fans wanted venom and he cant just make these movies for himself (check the special features its there) so he half assed threw him in. Listen im not trashing raimi just saying things arnt as black and white as they seem
 
It's not there not give details on story, it's here to make teenage girls cry... it's Twilight, with Spidey... Seriously, I don't understand good review of the trailer...
 
But Riami stood his ground with S-M4. He told Sony "f*** you" and rightfully so. I would have done the same.
 
Does anybody know what Peter says to Gwen when they're in Oscorp? Couldn't quite understand it correctly.
 
How many people thought the tone of the teaser was way, way off? Don't get me wrong, Spiderman has plenty room for angst and drama, but I don't think that should be the central feel of the film (or the teaser). One of the reasons so many people are attracted to Spiderman I think is because he IS a fun superhero. This isn't Batman. This is a sarcastic, wisecracking superhero who is an everyday guy. I don't know. Maybe it was just me.

Still excited for the movie, but the trailer honestly worried me more than anything.
 
Does anybody know what Peter says to Gwen when they're in Oscorp? Couldn't quite understand it correctly.
I think he says "I was jsut...nothing" or something like that. After that, she told him to not touch anything.
 
LMAO, ruined what?! And now you're just overreacting. I'm just saying I think your compalint is stupid. Does that mean you have to agree? No.
Ur right i am. The thing is i wasnt complaining i even said it had charm to it but it didnt come off as real to me. Granted neither does a man swinging around newyork in a costume. I was just saying that from what i understand the humor will be less corny. But to each his own.
 
It's not there not give details on story, it's here to make teenage girls cry... it's Twilight, with Spidey... Seriously, I don't understand good review of the trailer...

I didn't see twilight in anyway...? Where did you see it? :huh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,359
Messages
22,091,390
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"