Okay, so...re: New Avengers #7...there's this petty lizard-portion of my brain that totally enjoys Spider-Man being the only Avenger that can't get paid because he won't reveal his identity, and I actually think it's a good precedent for SHIELD to set; the SHRA may be gone, but it's good that the federal government is still willing to play hardball with masked superhumans. I like the Heroic Age, I like that the heroes are getting their due, but putting superhumans in total control of the government is basically as bad as putting the government in total control of superhumans.
On the other hand...I just have to give a resounding "Wait, really?" in regards to that scene. Are we really sure that this logic makes sense here? And by "we" of course I mean "Bendis." It's just...this is the Avengers, not a BevMo. They seriously can't find a way to pay Spider-Man just because they can't write a check? I mean, Hand is like "This is not a cash business" and it's like...um, why not? Any particular reason? And Danny was gonna give Peter his check and then was like "Oh wait I guess I can't sign it to you anyway" but it's like...yeah, you can. If you wanna help that bad, why don't you
A) Deposit the check that you were gonna give him.
B) Withdraw the money you just deposited
C) Give him the money.
D) ????
E) Profit! Actually not profit
I know that having Peter be employed out of SHIELD's (apparently sizable) pockets is one of those things that no one is ever gonna do because DERRR PARKER LUCKKKKK, and it's really not such a big deal at the end of the day, but I'm just sayin', it's just another one of those scenes that seem kinda funny and cute at first glance but just makes less and less sense the more you think about it.