Kevin Smith
Superhero
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 6,176
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
This is completely untrue. Garrick has served as a mentor for all 3 Flashes and was even Barry's original inspiration for his secret identity.
Wrong. When Barry became Flash, Jay was non existant, in some other reality. Jay was merely a comic book character to Barry until he discovered the multiverse a few years later in his career. Even in post crisis stories, Jay had seemingly vanished with the rest of Keystone City and wasn't there to tutor Barry in his early days as Flash and didn't appear until Barry had been Flash for about 4 years or so. Everything Barry did and discovered, he did on his own. Jay and all the other remaining JSAers didn't come out of retirement till after Barry had been Flash for a few years, which mirrors them being reintroduced in the comics after Barry Allen jump started the silver age and caused a resurgence in comics.
And what do you mean Jay is the inspiration for Barry's name? Are you saying he called himself Flash because of Jay's comics or that the creators named him Barry after Jay? FYI, the "Barry" part of Barry Allen was named after a tv/radio show personality whose full name escapes me at the moment, I forget whom his last name was taken after, but it wasn't Jay Garrick. Either way, calling himself "Flash" because of Jay's comics doesn't mean that Jay was his tutor and does not make Barry a legacy character. Inspiration isn't even synonymous with legacy.
I'd say Garrick is more deserving for a spot in The Flash movie than Barry.
ROTFLMAO!
Seriously? More than Barry, who is the iconic/definitive Flash, and was Flash longer than anyone (over 30 years) including Jay Garrick (who was only Flash for 11 years), who was like a father to Wally and supported him in everything he did before Wally even knew Jay existed, Barry, who created the scarlet speedster identity, whose discoveries and accomplishments exceed those of any other speedster to this day? Clearly, you don't know Barry Allen. Jay is about as important to a Flash film as Max Mercury or Johnny Quick, well probably a little more important than they but you get my point. I think. 
Having Wally established as The Flash would not follow a typical 3 act origin. It by passes all the experimenting with powers, setting up villains, etc... We've all seen that way too many times, let's move on.
Having Barry die and then having Wally become Flash is an origin story. Only difference is he doesn't have to create the identity or discover his powers, he just needs to establish himself as Flash and that's what the film would be about. And as far as villains go, the Rogues, either way, don't need "in depth" origin stories, they can be like the Joker from TDK and just "be". But I'm sure if Wally is Flash and one of the Rogues takes out Barry he'll be swearing bloody vengeance and whichever Rogue did the deed will surely be established like most other movie villains. So doing Wally as Flash is just a much more complex, confusing origin story for non comic book audiences.
And how would it be confusing at all? A ten minute prologue setting Wally West as Barry's sidekick and Barry's death is all you need. People aren't stupid.
People unfamiliar with The Flash, GL, etc, need a name and a face for The Flash with a comprehensive back story. Try telling someone you know who is completely unfamiliar with comic books who Wally West or Jay Garrick are without mentioning Barry. You can't do it (believe me, I've tried). People may not know much about The Flash, but they can pick him out of a crowd. My cousin who doesn't know **** about comics pointed to The Flash on the DC Universe Encyclopedia out of the rest of the characters on there, and she said "that's The Flash". Try showing that person Jay Garrick and then telling him he's The Flash, and that he was The Flash before Barry but was cancelled and twice removed, blah, blah, blah, so on and so forth. People will pretend to listen if anything. So you just get thru explaining who Barry Allen/the Flash is; "a forensic scientist who got hit by lightning and gained super speed", a simple enough back story, and people begin to care. Now try explaining who Wally West is. It's already enough and a stretch for this new audience to take in that there was a guy who got hit by lightning and not only survived but also somehow got powers and became a superhero, and if you explain Jay Garrick, that another person was in another lab accident and got super speed and called himself the Flash, now it seems really far fetched and you're going to tell them about Wally West, a tween, who is Barry Allen's nephew by marriage, who, while visiting his uncle in the very same lab/place that he had an accident in, the very same accident suddenly and coincidentially repeats itself, giving young Wally powers just like The Flash. If they're still listening, this person is batting their eyes now. Now try explaining that he's Flash's sidekick "Kid Flash", the idea of a sidekick in general is already absurd and somewhat latently homosexual to common people thanks to stereotypes, and they also are expected to imbibe the name "Kid Flash", and it will seem like a joke to them, the very reason they don't read comic books. Now tell them after Barry died, Kid Flash became the new Flash. And after Kid Flash Flash disappeared, Barry's grandson from the future, Impulse, who also became the new Kid Flash, became the new Flash. Yeah, let's fit that into a movie, one movie, the first movie no less.
Confused yet? If not, be thankful you're a fellow comic book geek, otherwise you would never have gotten this.No, the Flash film needs to start at the top, at the foundation of the legacy/mythos, with something easy for new audiences to comprehend and pique their interest and make them care enough about the Flash to want to know more about him, and then go into the deep, complex history that the character has from there in sequels. They need a name and a face, something definitive for the new characters, and as far as Flash goes, Barry Allen is that person. The best origin stories are simple. Like "bitten by a radioactive spider" or "struck by chemicals and lightning" or "given a power ring for his honesty and bravery".
To really explain Wally's origin, you'd need to also explain who Barry was (same with Kyle Rayner).
Bogging the NEW audience down with over 30 years of continuity in the first film will freeze out new comers, just like the comics have done.
Using a simple origin, and using the most definitive/iconic version of a character makes it easier to attract new fans to the bigger DC Universe, which will be much more introductory and well recieved if the new comers have some sort of foundation to start with. And the DCU does need to attract new fans.
So go with the simplest, most iconic/definitive version of the character (Barry Allen, Hal Jordan, Steve Rogers, Ray Palmer, Ollie Queen) and get a good writer capable of good characterization to craft an interesting story (cuz even the best of plots can fail due to poor characterization and bad writing in general) and you'll have an awesome movie.
Except that's not how Wally deals with Barry's death. Wally becomes an arrogant *******, which is something we really haven't seen in a Superhero movie (with the possible exception of Iron Man).
And he whines about how he's "never gonna be the man Barry was" and how he doesn't think he can fill his boots, you know this (I think). And Iron Man and the GL film both feature "arrogant" protagonsists, so that's been done as well. So has the legacy thing not that any of that matters.
Not to mention he eventually surpasses Barry, which is something I've seen him admit in a few comics. I'll post scans from Quiver later.
In which ways does he "surpass" Barry? He may have surpassed him in some powers (powers, not usage of them), but as far as accomplishments and iconography (and intellect) goes, Wally will always be second best. And DC telling us repeatedly that the successor is "better" like they also did with Kyle Rayner over and over again (and how Marvel has done with Bucky Captain America) to try and brain wash us into "accepting them" over their predecessors, frankly, doesn't mean a damn thing to me. They have to keep telling us because we can't see it. I don't see it, and anyone familiar with the originals (Barry, Hal, the ones who gave way to the successors) doesn't either.
Bottom line, The Flash is DC's greatest legacy character and to limit the movie to only Barry Allen would be an insult.
Bottom line: Wally may be the greatest, most definitive/iconic legacy character, but Barry Allen is the greatest, most definitive/iconic Flash, and to exclude him from the movie and use him as nothing other than a plot point for shoe-horning Wally into his suit is insulting. Doing the film with Barry first, like the comics, would not be "limiting" storytelling but would quite contrarily be the stepping stone for more great stories to come, because Wally comes after Barry Allen, and therefore works best that way. Barry was well established for over 30 years in the comics before Wally became Flash for the next 22 years. Wally didn't just wake up Flash, there was a lot of continuity, a lot of history, a lot of stories leading up to Wally becoming Flash. Those events aren't easily or justly crammed into "the first ten minutes" of The Flash film. Don't you think they could maybe do at least one or two films with Barry before moving on to Wally? For the sake of at least telling the best Wally West story, I hope you do.


t: