Sarg92
Ouch!
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2006
- Messages
- 2,389
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 31
The fact is that audiences weren't ready for the 2003 version. This was the post-Spider-Man era of superhero movies when they were expected to be superaccessible pop blockbusters. (The era that the Edward Norton version belonged in.) If this movie had come out in the wake of The Dark Knight, people would've loved it.
I agree that audiences weren't ready for Ang's Hulk but I don't believe it would have been a better success if released around the same time as The Dark Knight. I reckon Ang's Hulk is a much deeper and layered film than The Dark Knight. It would still receive the love/hate treatment because people either understand the themes of the film or they just don't. Some may not find the characters engaging or likeable (I can see that being the case - the characters, especially Banner, seem cold to me).
Ang's Hulk is deeper, intellectual and analytical than The Dark Knight. I don't know why people think The Dark Knight is so intellectual, the film is well written, acted and directed but by no means is it deep where it is difficult to understand!