- Joined
- Oct 24, 2004
- Messages
- 162,736
- Reaction score
- 12,122
- Points
- 203
Not the business thing I was thinking of, but that he could be so "fooled" by the guy ending up as his enemy. And the fact that bad-guys also got hold of his weapons. A bit too surprised, he should have forseen the possibility that the bad-guys in Afghanistan could get a hold of his weapons.
He was fooled by him b/c he had known him since he was a boy, it was his fathers best friend, his life long mentor, there was no reason to suspect him of betrayal. As for the weapons, it plays into the arc, Stark was a self indulgent playboy with a genius mind but absolutely no concept of the real world or the consequences of his actions, that's why the wake up call is so massive for him at the end of act 1.
They are building something big and I hope they succeed. This was a real blast, Favreau did a great job. He's like Michael Bay with more intellect and a bit less testosterone. Marvel could not get a better start and this is a kind of movie that very few will dislike. It has an universal appeal and it was more fun than Batman Begins.
I agree, i think Fav has kicked Iron Man off like Raimi did with Spidey, the sequel has so much potential of where it can go with the characters and the other suits that can be brought into use.
I like how Stark is much like Bale, but he is much more ruthless and charming. And does not spend all day philosophizing. But a tad more naive then Wayne. But ultimately Wayne is a nicer guy showing more mercy. Iron Man was really bad ass, but his confidence and charm makes him a more likable character then the more gritty (but surprisingly nicer) Wayne.
For the real villain in this movie was actually Stark. He did his transformation and had to clean up the mess left by the bad-guy Stark. But he did not leave his "ruthlessness" behind. He has no hesitation when it comes to killing. I liked that "edge" about him and it will be interesting to see where they take him in the future.
Very good way of putting it, i agree completely on the first part.

On the second i also partially agree although he is co villain i would say, his villain part comes from his complete ignorant existence inside his own billionaire world as opposed to any malice. Stane's villain is built on pure greed and evil.