• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Playstation The Official PlayStation 6 Thread

Will you be getting one?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.
I don't see how 8k wouldn't be more mainstream at least 10 years from now. There's obviously a difference compare to 4k. Its not similar to newer audio tech, in which only few would notice the audio upgrade.

16k, though is a bit extreme. I can see 8k as the peak unless the public really want screens as tall as their doors, then they would need 16k for the best resolution.
 
4K will most likely remain the standard for the foreseeable future.

For gaming, a significant number of AAA games cannot even reach 1080p, let alone 1440 or 4K, and require upscaling to hit higher resolution targets (to mixed results). GPU horsepower is better off being used doing other things (like RT). It's about the overall quality of the image being generated, not the raw number of pixels rendered. In fact, I think the most commonly used monitors are still 1080p.

For movies, the typical home viewing distance would not see much benefit from 8K. You'd need a very large screen (85"+) to notice any difference, and as the screen size increases, the cost goes up exponentially. Very few modern films are even completed at resolutions over 4K. I think one of the only exceptions is Christopher Nolan, who is the only filmmaker that still uses a photochemical process to develop his films, which retains the negative's original image quality. True IMAX and 70mm can be developed at resolutions that approximate 16K, but the vast majority of IMAX films are completed at merely 2K (like nearly all MCU movies).

Physical media is on the way out, so there's almost zero chance of a new format being created. And streaming video at 8K would require significantly more data to be transferred, and I'm not sure that most homes would have internet fast enough to handle it.

To put it more succinctly, I think 4K will remain the standard for at least the next ten years, at minimum. And the next generation of consoles will also still be 4K.
 
Just like the ps5 I’ll buy once the hype dies down and there are some games I want. As I get ready for my 40s don’t game as much as I use to
 
 
At this stage in console performance, does anyone really care which is more powerful as opposed to which has better games/selection?
 
I got a PS 5 Pro last year so I'll definitely wait to see if they relase a PS 6 Pro eventually. Which feels likely if the rumours are true that PS6 won't be a huge step forward technically to keep costs down.

I wonder which generation of SSD they will go with (unless Sony comes up with another solution for storage) Will they stick to gen 4 (again to keep costs down) but at least with more storage. Say 2TB in the base model and maybe 4TB in Pro? Or will they go with gen 5? It's possible PS 6 might even be an early adopter of gen 6 just like PS 5 was one of the first machines to use gen 4. But perhaps a gen 6 SSD is a bit of overkill to have in a game console. And they might be too expensive.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,976
Messages
22,048,045
Members
45,845
Latest member
Postal
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"