The Official Spider-Man 3 Runtime thread!

120 mins is the perfect time imo, i tend to get bored if it's any longer
 
120 mins is the perfect time imo, i tend to get bored if it's any longer

Don't worry, this movie is not going past 140 minutes, IMO.

IMDB is the last site in the world that I would trust.
 
On that dark horizons site, it says:

Meanwhile Arad also confirmed that "Spider-Man 3" will clock in over two hours, making it the longest film of the franchise.

Which is sorta stupid because the first two films clocked in over two hours. So, how do THEY know if it's the longest film in the franchise?

I still stick with 156 minutes, though.
 
And, Doc Ock, **** you! It seems like you don't WANT a 156-minute Spider-Man movie.

Craigaat is one of the reasons for our intelligence deficit. You know, those annoying teens who can't watch a movie over two hours.
 
And, Doc Ock, **** you! It seems like you don't WANT a 156-minute Spider-Man movie.

Are you out of your mind??

You swear at me because I don't believe IMDB?? Grow the hell up :whatever:

You're pathetic, even for a troll.
 
Yeah Doc, **** you and your rationality.
 
And, Doc Ock, **** you! It seems like you don't WANT a 156-minute Spider-Man movie.

Craigaat is one of the reasons for our intelligence deficit. You know, those annoying teens who can't watch a movie over two hours.

Was that really necessary?
 
IMDB is not a reliable site. I think everyone should take the running time with a grain of salt.
 
I hope that is correct
But arnt they the ones that say aunt may will be carnage?
 
i hope this is right
but arnt they the ones that said aunt may was carnage
 
i hope this is right
but arnt they the ones that said aunt may was carnage

Yes and she better be as well otherwise Sony is gong to be receiving a letter from me...a very angry letter.
 
Man **** You Doc Ock!

:oldrazz:

Mods: I am joking.
 
Don't worry, this movie is not going past 140 minutes

That's why I got mad! You keep on trying to discredit the idea of a 156-minute Spider-Man movie.
 
That's why I got mad! You keep on trying to discredit the idea of a 156-minute Spider-Man movie.

You missed the part where I said IMO = In My Opinion. I can have an opinion, right?? I am entitled not to believe IMDB.

If that angers you, then tough. But, don't swear at me. Try some anger management therapy, because you're very easily riled.

I'm not against the idea of a 156 minute movie. I just don't believe it will be that long. Especially if this info comes from IMDB.

And to Boom and farmerfran, **** you too :heart: :oldrazz:

Yes Mods, I'm kidding too
 
Okay, there's a lot of swearing going on here, it's time for me to make some JELL-O...that'll calm you kids down.

Name your flavor.
 

Meanwhile Arad also confirmed that "Spider-Man 3" will clock in over two hours, making it the longest film of the franchise.

Spider-Man, minus the credits, was 1 hour and 56 mins. and Spider-Man 2, minus the credits, was about 2 hours and 3 mins....so, darkhorizons.com was wrong on that, even though Spider-Man 3 will be way longer than S-M 2, Spider-Man 2 was still over two hours.

Edit: Cristo said it first, haha...my bad.
 
^ We know, but it doesn't proof anything unfortunatly... We need some serious official word on the running time, and all we got is Avi Arad saying that it clocks in a little over 2 HOURS... however that can mean so much, so we dont know anything.
 
the conversation keeps recylcing itself.

Someone says imdb confirms a running time of 156 minutes, ppl argue and discredit imdb conversation turns to jokes and slowly dies, enter random noob..."so imdb says the running time is 156 minutes"
 
I think people are forgetting that IMDB is the site that claimed Aunt Carnage would be in the movie.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"