Spade
Seeking new challengers
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2006
- Messages
- 9,970
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 58
Realistically, I can't see Storm beating Jean in a straight-up bout (why they would fight non-withstanding). I feel that the Phoenix is the inexorable essence of Jean, and have always felt that way. To say 'Jean is not the Phoenix' is sort of like saying 'Storm is a seperate entity from her own powers' in my book. I've always defined the two as being one in the same.
But I digress. My view is that if both are written to the level they should be written Jean would beat Storm. The way that Storm was originally written gives me no real concept of her being able to do half of what the Phoenix can do. I don't really add in moments where the Phoenix is seen to be weaker than she should be, or when Storm is showing off some interglactic-impacting ability we've yet to see up until now. Storm has been shown as a powerful mutant capable of summoning damaging gales and the worst of elemental aspects to her command, but in comparison to a being who can alter things on a molecular scale at whim and has power over telekinetic and telepathic scales exceeding any known limit I just don't see her winning. I'm not saying she couldn't- anything can happen in a comic- just that in my own views of where both characters should be standing and in my interpretation of what the Phoenix is I can't see Ororo winning this written the way she should be and under fair circumstances.
As for the aforementioned attitudes of Jean fanboys when sparring with the equally-ravenous Storm fanboys, I look at it the same way I look at the Hulk and Mace v. Sidious on theforce.net's forums: admitting a character can lose, even a favorite, holds no shame. In the end you waste moments of your life trying to prove over the 'Net that [subject A] can beat [subject B] or that [subject A] is better than [insert everything that is not subject A here]. It's pointless, and in real life discerning behavior. With all the venom both sides spit at each other and all the insults aimed at each other and the characters themselves I'm surprised people haven't started using racial slurs to prove their side of the argument. Some of the 'debating statements' are just a notch above that level. I've yet to see what's entertaining about this troubling method of writing some people have started rampantly using here and in other forums.
But I digress. My view is that if both are written to the level they should be written Jean would beat Storm. The way that Storm was originally written gives me no real concept of her being able to do half of what the Phoenix can do. I don't really add in moments where the Phoenix is seen to be weaker than she should be, or when Storm is showing off some interglactic-impacting ability we've yet to see up until now. Storm has been shown as a powerful mutant capable of summoning damaging gales and the worst of elemental aspects to her command, but in comparison to a being who can alter things on a molecular scale at whim and has power over telekinetic and telepathic scales exceeding any known limit I just don't see her winning. I'm not saying she couldn't- anything can happen in a comic- just that in my own views of where both characters should be standing and in my interpretation of what the Phoenix is I can't see Ororo winning this written the way she should be and under fair circumstances.
As for the aforementioned attitudes of Jean fanboys when sparring with the equally-ravenous Storm fanboys, I look at it the same way I look at the Hulk and Mace v. Sidious on theforce.net's forums: admitting a character can lose, even a favorite, holds no shame. In the end you waste moments of your life trying to prove over the 'Net that [subject A] can beat [subject B] or that [subject A] is better than [insert everything that is not subject A here]. It's pointless, and in real life discerning behavior. With all the venom both sides spit at each other and all the insults aimed at each other and the characters themselves I'm surprised people haven't started using racial slurs to prove their side of the argument. Some of the 'debating statements' are just a notch above that level. I've yet to see what's entertaining about this troubling method of writing some people have started rampantly using here and in other forums.