The Official Superman Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Gus Gorman should have a cameo in AC. even though Donner didnt create him.
 
Has Otis shown up yet? I've only skimmed through the issues from this story on the racks in the shop, seeing one of the most horribly written Bizarro appearances ever, and just a whole lot more needless retconning going on left and right, so I haven't actually been able to bring myself to buy any of the issues.

As such, I honestly don't know, nor would I be surprised in the least, if Otis made his presence known in this arc.
 
Mogwai said:
Did anyone read the article in the latest Wizard (184) about what's coming up in Action Comics? Johns mentions that Bizarroworld will have a 'Land of the Dead' feel and that Brainiac's going to evolve & become more of a threat. I have a feeling that this title's going to become one of my favorites.


Wow, that sounds horrible.
 
If Otis shows up, I'm so buying it.
 
Spike_x1 said:
Has Otis shown up yet? I've only skimmed through the issues from this story on the racks in the shop, seeing one of the most horribly written Bizarro appearances ever, and just a whole lot more needless retconning going on left and right, so I haven't actually been able to bring myself to buy any of the issues.

As such, I honestly don't know, nor would I be surprised in the least, if Otis made his presence known in this arc.

Needless fanboy *****fest numer...32185, isn't it?
 
**** otis... that stupid twit is the personification of everything wrong with S:TM
 
Superman: Idols said:
Needless fanboy *****fest numer...32185, isn't it?
Is it really fanboyism when someone points out a writer's inability to write any character within their established personality, as well as said writer's fetish with ignoring past continuity at their leisure and putting in inferior elements from a decades old movie?

If that's what you call a "fanboy *****fest," can you please show me what voicing valid criticisms looks like? :confused:
 
Lex will probably have some kind of lackey, if not Otis it will be Kitty.
 
Ugh. More film Superman crap. I love the original Donner film, but there are so many things wrong with his adaptations.
 
Mogwai said:
Lex will probably have some kind of lackey, if not Otis it will be Kitty.

Any ones fine, as long as it isnt his ****ing nephew:cmad:
 
So... what's going on with the Donner & John Action Comics line?
 
I've said this before, but if the kid is an continuation to the superman mythos, such as lois and clark being married, and doesnt disapear after one arc, like damien al ghul wayne, i'll be fine with it.
 
Are you under the impression I hate it because of the kid? Thats the least of this book's problems.
 
I dunno. It seems if someone was going to hate it, it would be because of the kid. Do you not like it because of Lex? Bizarro? Gimme a brief 5 word summary if you will.
 
I dunno. It seems if someone was going to hate it, it would be because of the kid. Do you not like it because of Lex? Bizarro? Gimme a brief 5 word summary if you will.

kid...Jor-el...Lex....Plot....Donner.
 
I think people would definitely be more accepting of a kid if it were actually Superman and Lois' child and not just a big "OMG!!1!1 He's Zod's!!!" plot twist.

Not saying that that difference would make any of the plot or writing in this arc good, but it would certainly be an improvement.
 
no zod on the list eh? that would be my number 1. what's ur beef with jor-el?
 
I think people would definitely be more accepting of a kid if it were actually Superman and Lois' child and not just a big "OMG!!1!1 He's Zod's!!!" plot twist.

Not saying that that difference would make any of the plot or writing in this arc good, but it would certainly be an improvement.

I like that Superman and Lois are adopting the child. I find it more beleiveable than a ******ed Kryptonian/Earthican hybrid child.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"