Chewy
REDACTED
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Messages
- 13,000
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Ah, I see. Is this a financial policy rather than a creative one?
I'm just thinking it would not really be good business for Marvel to pass up on shorter time frame sequels to any hits they might have (Like Iron-Man for instance, I would think will surely have a sequel by 2010) If the Hulk scores well too, again, waiting anything more than 3 years does seem to be somewhat wasteful.
Yep, Iron Man 2 and Thor are the two in the works for 2010, while Captain America and The Avengers are the two planned for 2011. So I'm sure we'll see Hulk on the big screen again before 2012, but probably not in his own solo movie.
I think the policy is partially financial, and partially not wanting to oversaturate the market with superhero movies.