This would be brilliant. Especially considering any reference of his parents was left out of TDK.
This is such an important part of who Batman is;yet in TDK his parents weren't even mentioned.
And yet his parents aren't mentioned in every single Batman comic ever.
We can go a bit without mentioning them. And yes, even once.
Exactly.
I've always felt that Leslie Thompson was such an important character to have in Nolans universe, but i feel adding her now would seem a bit off. If Batman is injured, he or Alfred seem to have enough mediacl knowlege to mend Bruce.
And yet his parents aren't mentioned in every single Batman comic ever.
We can go a bit without mentioning them. And yes, even once.
Very different from the comics, with the comics there are thousands upon thousands of them. Every year there are masses of comics put out, there are a ton of things each of the comics can do without from time to time.
The films are much more rare, we only get one every 3 or 4 years. His parents death is integral to Batman as the person he is. As proven by TDK, his parents being mentioned is not necessary so I agree. Even a big subplot or constant flashbacks about his parents would be interrupting or annoying, but a simple scene with Bruce visiting their graveyard would be touching. And a reminder as to why he does what he does.
The theme of "Batman Begins" was Batman coming to terms with his fear of bats, which was associated with overcoming past demons - facing his horrible memories, and embracing them, letting them transform him (literally). So to revisit his parents in "The Dark Knight" may seem necessary for an ongoing comic series to remind the audience of motivations, but in a finite movie universe, it would seem redundant. The general audience is well aware of Batman's origin and why he does what he does. The theme of "The Dark Knight" is escalation and Batman realizing he must be whatever Gotham needs him to be - hero, villain, etc. His parents' death was part of a character arc that has finished.
However, in Part III, if it is indeed about redemption and realizing he must be Batman forever, then perhaps a nod to his parents' death would be cool and could serve the story well - but it's not essential.
Even in the animated series, the pain he feels for his parents is lessened over time. He still feels it, because he loved them, but it's not as hard anymore.
It's not gone, but it's not the prevailing thought that compels him to be Batman anymore.
He's Batman because that's all he is on the inside. And that's all he'll ever be.
Yeah Nolan should cast Vanessa Redgrave to play her.
The theme of "Batman Begins" was Batman coming to terms with his fear of bats, which was associated with overcoming past demons - facing his horrible memories, and embracing them, letting them transform him (literally). So to revisit his parents in "The Dark Knight" may seem necessary for an ongoing comic series to remind the audience of motivations, but in a finite movie universe, it would seem redundant. The general audience is well aware of Batman's origin and why he does what he does. The theme of "The Dark Knight" is escalation and Batman realizing he must be whatever Gotham needs him to be - hero, villain, etc. His parents' death was part of a character arc that has finished.
However, in Part III, if it is indeed about redemption and realizing he must be Batman forever, then perhaps a nod to his parents' death would be cool and could serve the story well - but it's not essential.
I like your post, all except for the bolded part. His parents death as a character arc will never truly be over because it is what makes up who Batman is. That arc will be over when Batman decides to quit. When Batman's one man war on crime is over...that is the day the arc of his parents death is over.
Yeah Nolan should cast Vanessa Redgrave to play her.
I see where you are going with this, but I disagree. I think his parents' death was a catalyst for Bruce becoming Batman- it was a criminal action, a horrible tragedy, a brutal murder that destroyed young Bruce so much he wanted to try and prevent it from happening to others. But in Batman Begins, Bruce accepted their death, and his fear of bats, and embraced them - he accepted that they had transformed him into a different person and used it as a weapon to "prey against those who prey on the fearful (he himself having once been the fearful).
So while the tragedy shaped him into the character he is now, it no longer defines his mission. Instead his mission is driven by a desire to continue his father's war on poverty or Dent's war on crime - but not as a hero. As a dark knight, one who criminals can fear as he once feared bats or his repressed memories.
I guess we all were reading wrong Batman comics Bats.
just buy the Batman TAS dvds ^^^ if you would like to see that
the oval logo is poop
TDK was seriously lacking in those, he didn't even use the grappling gun! BATMAN ALWAYS USES THE GRAPPLING GUN!
Sarah Essen did not appears on that... and i´m not referring to the oval, but any kind of evolution on the bat symbol it´s necessary - i think.