Lazmarquez
Famke for President!
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2005
- Messages
- 407
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
i'd love to see posters hinting to xavier/jean tension/battles, so i made another one.. lol here ya go 



Lazmarquez said:i'd love to see posters hinting to
xavier/jean tension/battles, so i made another one.. lol
here ya go
![]()
Lazmarquez said:
Lazmarquez said:
Lazmarquez said:took a stab at making a couple of
avatars as well, hopefully they come in handy lol..
![]()
![]()
ComicQueen said:All in all, you are getting much much better than you were a month ago. I'm assuming from all my mass critiquing and tips have helped in directing you in a good direction.
newwaveboy87 said:i think you're patting yourself on the back too much, and giving yourself way too much credit.
newwaveboy87 said:when you do anything long enough you're bound to get better at it and improve upon your own skills. you've just provided a few helpful hints for him to help himself - and chances are he's already looked at this work and noticed the problems.
ComicQueen said:Oh really? So when did he start improving? Aren't the images getting better? I think so and without critique (myself included) we couldn't get better. No one on here is willing to dish out the criticism which is why there are so many bad images and artwork on here.
You need to read the posts correctly, he claims to have been a Graphic Artist for a very long time. I'm not and have discovered I'm better than he is and tackled on original designing. If he's been doing this that long he doesn't "need" to get better because by default he already is.
Unless you are a novice.
newwaveboy87 said:seeing as how he's said he does these images for five minutes while AT WORK, i don't think they need critiquing. now if he said these were things he slaved for over hours and hours, then yes, they should be. but five minutes at work? no need. it'd be like critiquing some sketch i did while bored in class for ten minutes as compared to a project i put hours of effort into..
newwaveboy87 said:these are just for fun. no more, no less.
and one self is their own worst critique. everyone else just offers suggestions for possible improvement. and seeing as how art is more subjective, i personally like a lot of Laz's work more so then some of the things you've shown us. no offense is meant, but that was a really cocky statement.
newwaveboy87 said:a lesser person would've backed away. but you've put your money where your mouth it. you've got my respect.
ComicQueen said:5 Minutes at work? Give me a break. You really don't think that's true, eh? If you do then there are many things I'd like to sell you through Ebay.
Yes they do need critiquing and compare this to the other HORRORS he's displayed on here they have gotten so much better. I give him BRAVO's for all the improvemet he has exhibited recently.
Through his experience he should be so much better than what's exhibited here especially for someone that does this as his profession. I know too many "amatuers" that can perform such amazing feats within 5 minutes that make this look hokey and terrible by comparison. This coming from amateurs mind you, not someone who went to school or is employed for this.
I'm sick of all the junkyard sites and tacky artwork.
Oh no it's not cocky, it's called being confident of my work. While you maynot appreciate it I can understand why considering what you do like.
oh let's recap:
You may not like me on a personal level which I couldn't really care but the bottom line is I'm good at what I do and don't give mediocre fair.
bosef982 said:You know, reading through your posts and alleged "constructive critiques", I've just suddenly discovered the dictionary totally inadequate in describing three words:
pretentious
arrogant and
nauseating
I will also be sending you the doctor's bill for having my eyes pulled back down since they've gotten stuck in the top of my head...
newwaveboy87 said:there's lots of trash no matter what kind of art you're in. and not a whole lot can be done about it, people are going to do what they do whether you like it or not.
newwaveboy87 said:and you don't know what i like when it comes to art. sure i like some of Laz's work, but by no means do i think it's perfect. and i can see where suggestions are needed, but you come along and critique with a hachet.
newwaveboy87 said:and there is a big difference between being confident, and being cocky. your statement was cocky in my opinion. you might think you're better - and sure you might be technically better - but he's done things that are more creative and interesting visually. negative space can only go so far in a piece, and sustain interest for so long.
newwaveboy87 said:they were by no means horrors. were they the greatest things ever? no. not at all. but they showed a level of artistry, and room for growth and improvement, which he began to do before you came along.
but i think i am done now. this could get more heated and even more flammed then what it already is. and i still do give you props for putting your money where your mouth is, but you shouldn't critique so harshly. this is his work. and someone could turn around and do it too you just as harshly, if not more so.
newwaveboy87 said:just cause something has the technicality doesn't mean it's actually a good work of art. art is about more then the technical aspects.
and to be fair to a lot of the X-fans, they're more animation/cartooning/illustrating then graphic design, as far as i've seen.
and i never said you were doing this to be evil. nor do i even think you're doing it to be evil, you're jumping to conclusions. all i think is that you're critiques are a little too harsh on the guy. the end.
no more, no less.