The Original Harry Potter is back.

Wow, in the 1986 film, the main character was named Harry Potter and he finds out about a magical world of wizards and witches. Lol, Mrs. Rowling has her sources!

Honestly can't wait for this movie to be released, everyone and their grandmother is going to call it a ripoff! LOL
 
Wow, in the 1986 film, the main character was named Harry Potter and he finds out about a magical world of wizards and witches. Lol, Mrs. Rowling has her sources!

Honestly can't wait for this movie to be released, everyone and their grandmother is going to call it a ripoff! LOL
I know,It's going to be entertaining to see the public reaction.
 
Most misleading thread title ever.
 
Wow, in the 1986 film, the main character was named Harry Potter and he finds out about a magical world of wizards and witches. Lol, Mrs. Rowling has her sources!

I'd say that's enough to go after Rowling for some of that scrilla! Isn't she like the richest woman in the UK?

Honestly can't wait for this movie to be released, everyone and their grandmother is going to call it a ripoff! LOL

Chances are, they'll wuss out and change a few names and details. At this point, the Harry Potter books and movies have been around too long for the makers of Troll to cry foul, if they haven't already.
 
is this the trolll that runs around the apartment complex , that was a terrible movie
 
^All the Troll movies have been terrible movies.
 
Anyone hear of a childrens book called "Larry Potter"? it was a released a while before Harry Potter, but it was just a simple little children's book.

about a wizard boy that looks a lot like harry and apparently there are a lot of name similarities for other things. not like troll or dragon similarites, names that are apparently unique to the Harry Potter universe.

there was a lawsuit about it but thats the extent of what i know...
 
JK Rowling rips off a lot of people.

The director of the original film was asked about it, he said he heard a rumor that JK got the name from his film so if she used it as inspiration that's cool, he's never tried to sue or anything.
 
JK Rowling rips off a lot of people.

The director of the original film was asked about it, he said he heard a rumor that JK got the name from his film so if she used it as inspiration that's cool, he's never tried to sue or anything.

Punk b****.(j/k!)
 
There might be one other...


I didn't know what you meant at first until I took it into context of what your first post said.:oldrazz:

You're saying the movie will suck because of a webpage that has a troll wheezing in the background?

Righhhhtttt
 
I didn't know what you meant at first until I took it into context of what your first post said.:oldrazz:

You're saying the movie will suck because of a webpage that has a troll wheezing in the background?

Righhhhtttt
No, I am saying it will suck due to the quality of the last movies. I cannot think of one good Troll movie...can you?
 
i'd rather see a remake of Troll 2.

"do you want some, Joshua"?
 
No, I am saying it will suck due to the quality of the last movies. I cannot think of one good Troll movie...can you?
I only liked the first one because of the cheesiness.Hopefully this one has enough cheese to satisfy me.It's a guilty pleasure of mine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"