Hmm. You mean add in some extra scenes or a Jill scenario? I wouldn't be against some RE3 content sprinkled in since it's supposed to be concurrent and I can't foresee a RE3 remake to be honest. Plus I like some of the freakier enemies RE3 has also.
NO CRIMSON HEADS. That's my absolute least favorite part of the REmake. Hope this RE2 REmake has zero goddamned crimson heads.
Agreed. I loved all the additions of REmake.Haha f**k that. Crimsons were awesome. They added a much needed challenge to the game. Don't be babies. Games are allowed to challenge you.
Not pointless as such. It added a backstory as to what really created a lot of the creatures we saw in later games; Nemesis, for example. Was she needed? Not really. But she wasn't entirely pointless. Her inclusion, I thought, was quite well done. I like it best because it only enhanced the evilness of Umbrella, from that games perspective.
Eh.
Eh.
I hope they just remake RE2.
Something like seeing Jill chased out of the RPD building by Nemesis in a similar vein to the chopper crash in 'scenario B' would be good.I hope they incorporate RE3 into it, since it takes place at the same time. They can put in hints and references to Jill in this game without going into too much of that game. Maybe they could use this to have her actually interact with Leon and/or Claire for the first time in game
Eh. If they incorporate Jill, (and they should) they should go all in. Full third campaign.
You really think Capcom would make an attempt to remake RE3? Especially after what it took to get RE2 green lit? As much as hate to admit it, RE3 wasn't that popular. I doubt demand for that game being very high.