Here's that interview again with that moronic blowhard, Tom Rothman, head of 20th century Faux:
http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5599&Itemid=99
****
IESB: So, we get teased in the Wolverine trailer with Deadpool, he's a fan favorite, another second tier Iron Man-like character, and Ryan Reynolds has been dying to play this guy for years and I think that's why he even did the cameo because he wants a stand alone film. Any movement there?
TR: Yes and no, I mean, Deadpool is an integral part of X-Men Origins: Wolverine,
we are in the process now, of doing all the CG work to create that character at an A +++ level, that's being done in truly as state of the art fashion as possible...
IESB: Scarring and all?
TR:
It will be very rewarding for the fans, let's put it that way. It's a high level endeavor because he figures importantly in the movie, so whether he'll spin off into his own movie, if that's what you're asking, I don't know the answer. We will have to see.
IESB: Wolverine, how dark is it? The Dark Knight has been the darkest superhero movie and is still making money, compared to The Dark Knight, how dark is Wolverine?
TR: It's pretty dark, but, I don't know, I haven't seen the movie yet. But, it's in that realm, it's thematically a very dark story, so it is not Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm.
***
Isn't sunnybrook farm a flavor of Boone's sugar wine? That's uncalled for, Rothman.
So in Rothman's eyes, a character who looks like a Mortal Kombat ripoff (Baraka) with a pud face that looks smeared with cookie dough and childishly drawn over with sharpie pens--will be rewarding to the character's fanbase? Is everyone here as thrilled as I am?
Looks like Rothman should pull his head out of his ass. 'State of the art CG' and really amateurish ****** makeup do not a Deadpool make, my bloodsucking friend.