Homecoming The Spider-Man Skepticism Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Amazing Spider-man was far ore faithful than this.yes case can be made amazing spider-man was a bit too dark for spider-man but it was faithful
blending of 616 and ultimate in modernization.the parkers really felt like
family in that film.and they had house and not apartment.as you said flash
was really faithful to comics.as was gwen.that was first film that really
made peter seem smart as he was in comics.i was cirtical of villians with
split personalitys in rami trilogy but webb made it work in amazing spider-man.I didn't feel like they were thorwing characters in and randomly giving them names of comic characters.

homecoming is bound due to marvel studio brand be a bigger hit.not sure how critics will respond.but it's doudtful it will get unamous praise from fans
online like you hear for other marvel studios films.there is already vocal group of spider-man fans not liking what they are seeing.
It's a shame, really. Marvel was suppose to be the Studio to get Spidey right. I was beyond excited for their take on the character. And here we are with this Frankenstein's monster of bad elements mixed together & casual dismissal of the source material. Feige talks about Spider-Man & his mythos with such passion yet he gives us this? :dry:
 
Eh. Things change with every adaptation, and Marvel has a mostly good track record with their changes. I get some tentativeness with certain things, but I feel we're being a little pedantic with some of the stuff.
 
Eh. Things change with every adaptation, and Marvel has a mostly good track record with their changes. I get some tentativeness with certain things, but I feel we're being a little pedantic with some of the stuff.

Comic MJ: Beautiful, popular, outgoing, friendly, fashionable, sociable.

Michelle: Awkward, loner, bookish, frumpy, unsociable, introverted.

Comic Flash: Athletic, a jock, tall, a bully, complete opposite of a nerd

Homecoming Flash: Nerd, not a bully, shorter than Peter, academic.

Nah, not much difference there reallly. :o
 
Eh. Things change with every adaptation, and Marvel has a mostly good track record with their changes. I get some tentativeness with certain things, but I feel we're being a little pedantic with some of the stuff.
Exactly. Which is what makes all of their numerous changes to Spider-Man; their crown jewel as proclaimed by Feige, all the more baffling & confusing. I don't think we're being pedantic with any of these changes because they're just that extreme/radical.
 
Last edited:
Comic MJ: Beautiful, popular, outgoing, friendly, fashionable, sociable.

Michelle: Awkward, loner, bookish, frumpy, unsociable, introverted.

As far as we know, Michelle ≠ Mary Jane, so....

Comic Flash: Athletic, a jock, tall, a bully, complete opposite of a nerd

Homecoming Flash: Nerd, not a bully, shorter than Peter, academic.

Nah, not much difference there reallly. :o

I didn't say there wasn't much difference, what I said was:

Things change with every adaptation, and Marvel has a mostly good track record with their changes.

I'm not arguing about whether there are changes, because there obviously are. I'm pondering whether the changes ruin anything and whether fans will actually still be incensed about them after seeing the film. I'm no huge fan of changes to the source material, but I understand that each adaptation makes them. Changing Flash is less offensive in some people's eyes than changing the entire character of Otto Octavius in Spider-Man 2 and yet many defend that as the best Spider-Man film yet because of how well that change (and many others) worked in that movie.

Exactly. Which is what makes all of their numerous changes to Spider-Man; their crown jewel as proclaimed by Feige, all the more baffling & confusing. I don't think we're being pedantic with any of these changes because they're just that extreme/radical.

What I meant was, the changes they've made have been well-received overall by both fans and wider audiences.
 
As far as we know, Michelle ≠ Mary Jane, so....



I didn't say there wasn't much difference, what I said was:



I'm not arguing about whether there are changes, because there obviously are. I'm pondering whether the changes ruin anything and whether fans will actually still be incensed about them after seeing the film. I'm no huge fan of changes to the source material, but I understand that each adaptation makes them. Changing Flash is less offensive in some people's eyes than changing the entire character of Otto Octavius in Spider-Man 2 and yet many defend that as the best Spider-Man film yet because of how well that change (and many others) worked in that movie.
But dude, Otto's character was not completely changed though. He was still a nuclear & atomic physicist, inventor, and genius. He still designed his arms with a brain interface & the purpose of handling dangerous experiments. Hell, his origin of how he became Doc Ock was visually lifted off of the pages of the comics. The main changes they made was giving Otto a different motivation & making him sympathetic/redeemable. He was still recognizable as both Doc Ock & Otto Octavius. Compare that careful attention to detail to the sloppy, non-caring handling of every supporting character in this movie.



What I meant was, the changes they've made have been well-received overall by both fans and wider audiences.
Ehh, I'm not sure about that. Hardly anybody likes what they've done to Flash, every article I go to is filled with Spidey fans complaining about him (and certain people trying to defend it) & making jokes about him. Nobody likes the idea of Michelle being MJ besides hardcore MCU fans (Reddit) & Zendaya fans. The High-tech Iron Man-lit suit has gotten a **** ton of complaints to the point where you have people like Armin (CBC) trying to defend it. Longtime Spider-Man fansites like "Does Whatever a Spider Can" and "Spider-Man Crawlspace" hating elements of this movie. And don't forget the constant, consistent "Iron Man 4" jokes that pop up everywhere now. (esp after that final poster) It's clear that the fanbase is currently divided on these changes. It's actually surprising me because I thought most of us would eat it up because it's coming from Marvel.
 
Marvel is used to making changes to Z listers like Whiplash in the MCU, but they never had to handle a property as big as Spider-Man...With it's rather well established mythology.
 
But dude, Otto's character was not completely changed though. He was still a nuclear & atomic physicist, inventor, and genius. He still designed his arms with a brain interface & the purpose of handling dangerous experiments. Hell, his origin of how he became Doc Ock was visually lifted off of the pages of the comics. The main changes they made was giving Otto a different motivation & making him sympathetic/redeemable. He was still recognizable as both Doc Ock & Otto Octavius. Compare that careful attention to detail to the sloppy, non-caring handling of every supporting character in this movie.

Yeah, I guess you're right, they only changed core tenants of his character. :whatever:


Ehh, I'm not sure about that. Hardly anybody likes what they've done to Flash, every article I go to is filled with Spidey fans complaining about him (and certain people trying to defend it) & making jokes about him. Nobody likes the idea of Michelle being MJ besides hardcore MCU fans (Reddit) & Zendaya fans. The High-tech Iron Man-lit suit has gotten a **** ton of complaints to the point where you have people like Armin (CBC) trying to defend it. Longtime Spider-Man fansites like "Does Whatever a Spider Can" and "Spider-Man Crawlspace" hating elements of this movie. And don't forget the constant, consistent "Iron Man 4" jokes that pop up everywhere now. (esp after that final poster) It's clear that the fanbase is currently divided on these changes. It's actually surprising me because I thought most of us would eat it up because it's coming from Marvel.

I meant in previous MCU films, not referring to Homecoming because most people aren't going to judge it until it's out. We're definitely the minority around here/Crawlspace/etc. on that front.
 
All clips compiled to some chronology, anyone?
 
Yeah, I guess you're right, they only changed core tenants of his character. :whatever:




I meant in previous MCU films, not referring to Homecoming because most people aren't going to judge it until it's out. We're definitely the minority around here/Crawlspace/etc. on that front.
Uh, except they didn't. He wasn't Otto in name only. Comparing Doc Ock to Ned, Betty, Flash, Sally and "Michelle" and even Adrian Toomes (which is a fair change but still didn't have to connect to Stark) and guess who comes out as infinitely more true to the comics compared to all of those characters? False equivalence imo

And expressing displeasure towards what they've presented to us in the trailers is not the same thing as judging the movie as a whole.
 
Last edited:
Good thing is that a lot of what we've seen will be pretty difficult to place.
 
Just under a month until the movie is officially released...


Wow. We've sure come a long way from the speculation days of 2015, wondering whether the deal would actually happen, the O'Brien vs Lerman fan casting, wondering which Avenger(s) would show up etc. It's been a crazy couple of years lol
 
Yeah, that when everybody was super hyped & calling this the definitive Spider-Man. (Including me) Here we are now.... on the 33rd page of the skepticism thread.. :csad:
 
Yeah, that when everybody was super hyped & calling this the definitive Spider-Man. (Including me) Here we are now.... on the 33rd page of the skepticism thread.. :csad:

Well yea. You Do the most posting lol
 
Well yea. You Do the most posting lol
There are others. I put together a team. *cue Justice league's remix of "Come together"
justice-league-trailer.jpg



:o

But in all seriousness, am I the only one confused by Tom's insistence of MCU Spidey being based on the Ultimate comics? To the point where he said he stole certain quips & lines from that version? As an Ultimate Spidey enthusiast, I'm not seeing ANYTHING from those comics in this movie. Ultimate Peter is the opposite of MCU Peter. He's responsible, independent, burdened by his powers & he didn't want to be part of a bigger team, even after Ultimate Six until wayyy later in the series. Tom has to be confusing the comics with the cartoon. MCU Spidey shares an endless amount similarities with that version.
IronmanCaptain_America-Ultimate_Spider-Man-1940x1090.jpg

tumblr_m762t7na1N1qh5iszo1_500.gif
 
Last edited:
The whole high-school setting in this movies looks like a huge turn off to me.
 
The high school set up is ok, although there is something about it that seems very tv series-ish

How long till Zendayas character learns peter is spider-man and they become a trio where they discuss Peters issues and find ways into helping him
 
Part of me wants to watch the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon just to see how much the MCU Spidey seems to be based off of that version, because clearly either version doesn't seem to be the classic/definitive Spidey we all know.

So much about this film is beginning to annoy me. I want July to hurry up so I can finally have an opinion on the full film.

In regards to the NBA ads too, an Instagram user left a really interesting comment:

GB7nq02.png

Ij0uYKm.png

They're focusing on his youth, rather than his actual character, his awkward/nerdy/heroic self.

I think that's been the problem from the get go, as soon as they hired Watts as director because of his work on Cop Car and portraying kids realistically and decided to really take advantage of the fact of a teenage superhero in high school that's all they've really cared about; not nailing the character of Peter Parker/Spider-Man.

As you said harry, why didn't they just draw from the Ultimate comics for inspiration for a 15 year old Spider-Man in the first place? Why have him be a vlogging YouTuber and be afraid of heights and make him say 'cool' and 'awesome' all the time?

Urghh, never been so unexcited for a Spidey film in my life.
 
=GuestStar2004;35320711]


The high school set up is ok, although there is something about it that seems very tv series-ish
How long till Zendayas character learns peter is spider-man and they become a trio where they discuss Peters issues and find ways into helping him

Tbh it feels more like a Disney Channel original movie than a John Hughes one, but I'll reserve final judgment for July


Part of me wants to watch the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon just to see how much the MCU Spidey seems to be based off of that version, because clearly either version doesn't seem to be the classic/definitive Spidey we all know.

So much about this film is beginning to annoy me. I want July to hurry up so I can finally have an opinion on the full film.

In regards to the NBA ads too, an Instagram user left a really interesting comment:

GB7nq02.png

Ij0uYKm.png



I think that's been the problem from the get go, as soon as they hired Watts as director because of his work on Cop Car and portraying kids realistically and decided to really take advantage of the fact of a teenage superhero in high school that's all they've really cared about; not nailing the character of Peter Parker/Spider-Man.

As you said harry, why didn't they just draw from the Ultimate comics for inspiration for a 15 year old Spider-Man in the first place? Why have him be a vlogging YouTuber and be afraid of heights and make him say 'cool' and 'awesome' all the time?

Urghh, never been so unexcited for a Spidey film in my life.


This is my main problem with Peter in the MCU (besides the Stark thing)
 
It's a shame, really. Marvel was suppose to be the Studio to get Spidey right. I was beyond excited for their take on the character. And here we are with this Frankenstein's monster of bad elements mixed together & casual dismissal of the source material. Feige talks about Spider-Man & his mythos with such passion yet he gives us this? :dry:

exactly right.
 
Marvel is used to making changes to Z listers like Whiplash in the MCU, but they never had to handle a property as big as Spider-Man...With it's rather well established mythology.

spider-man is equilvent of batman and superma so their changing things around
and reimaging them for spider-man isn't going over as well as their other films where less people are aware of characters.
 
There are others. I put together a team. *cue Justice league's remix of "Come together"
justice-league-trailer.jpg



:o

But in all seriousness, am I the only one confused by Tom's insistence of MCU Spidey being based on the Ultimate comics? To the point where he said he stole certain quips & lines from that version? As an Ultimate Spidey enthusiast, I'm not seeing ANYTHING from those comics in this movie. Ultimate Peter is the opposite of MCU Peter. He's responsible, independent, burdened by his powers & he didn't want to be part of a bigger team, even after Ultimate Six until wayyy later in the series. Tom has to be confusing the comics with the cartoon. MCU Spidey shares an endless amount similarities with that version.
IronmanCaptain_America-Ultimate_Spider-Man-1940x1090.jpg

tumblr_m762t7na1N1qh5iszo1_500.gif

holland is good company man.amazing spider-man had a lot of influence from ultimate spider-man comic version yet it was more like spider-man mythois than homecoming.taking inspiration from bad USM cartoon makes sense to what they are thinking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"