That's exactly what you've done on this thread towards my posts man .
No, I did not.
And you were the one insulting me at first
And how exactly did I insult you?? What names did I call you??
Here's my original post to you:
http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11521836&postcount=504
Apart from some friendly sarcasm, smileys included to indicate that, where did I insult you??
Sorry kid but it doesn't work that way with me
Nothing works with you. You dodge every attempt at serious conversation by insulting me.
Like those pathetic "kiddie" remarks. I guarantee I'm alot older than you are.
Now you're totally lost of arguments
I seriously doubt that.
Ask the Venom smarks here about the size and body muscle of Topher Grace into the movie .
I have. They don't care about Topher's size. They like the evil Peter Parker image.
Do you REALLY think they would be HAPPY if Venom in the movie would be a nice Black Spider Man who , in the end, agrees to save MJ life AND peter's one too just because Sam Raimi feels so ?
Since Venom has saved Spider-Man, Black Cat, and many other innocents before in the comics from danger. Yeah, I'm sure they could.
It's not out of character for Venom to do the right thing. He had a whole series called Lethal Protector based on that.
Be aware, I was totally ready to enjoy Spidey 2 when I've first seen it and I, for one, absolutely ENJOYED Alfred Molina's acting and look into it .
My main complain (if you've read WELL my very first post ab out it), is the ending of the movie and how , all of a sudden, the mega baddie of the comics and the movie becomes a "good citizen guy"
That's how he was written in the movie. That was his character. He paralleled Peter's conflict, as any good villain does.
Peter was being irresponsible by giving up his responsibility as Spider-Man, so he could live the dream of a problem free life. Octavius was being irresponsible by doing evil things so he could make his dream succeed.
Both Peter and Octavius came full circle at the end when they each learned to do what is right you have to give up what you want the most, even your dreams.
The fact that Octavius showed redemption at the end was out of character with comic book Ock. But not movie Ock. And it didn't matter. He was still a well handled character and a compelling villain.
Ock saving Spidey's life while his whole life of comics he was obsessed with making his life a misery AND killing him ?
For the last time, that is not Ock's obsession. Prove me wrong. List me a few stories where that's Ock's goal. Go on. If you can't, then let it go. Because your constantly saying it without proving it is just stupid and immature. I've backed up my points. Extend me the same courtesy with yours.
Ock's goal is acquisition of power. Not destroying Spider-Man.
And again he was used a second field to Harry Osborn most of the flick, just a side kick or a lackey
Where are you pulling this rubbish from?? I've already established with quotes from the movie, that is not the case. Harry had TWO scenes with Ock. And in both scenes, Ock roughed up Harry and was calling the shots. You didn't see Ock getting shoved around or begging for mercy.
Ock was the driver of it. He went to Harry. He demanded the tritium. He chose the evil tactics to get Spider-Man. Not Harry. Why do you think Harry helped Peter find Ock?? MJ was in danger. Harry knew nothing about that, or anything else that Ock had done.
Ock did his own thing. He didn't answer to anyone, least of all Harry.
He brought back Spidey to Harry but couldn't care more about him at all (unlike the comics)
It's exactly like the comics. Spidey was out of his way. Ock moved on to complete his goal.
That's my grief towards this movie and the adaptation of a comic book character I grew up enjoying a lot .
Could you RESPECT that ?
No. Because your complaints are all based on unfounded nonsense. You keep saying the same things over and over without backing it up properly.
Again don't copy my sentences and try to get innovative instead
Then don't try and make me look immature, when you can't even use proper grammar.
Now, if you choose to respond to this post, try, really try not to just use petty insults for your answers. Please, be civil. Give me proper answers. Try and back up your points.
Otherwise, please don't respond. Lets not put this thread off topic any more than we already have.
t: 
