spideyman101
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2006
- Messages
- 912
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Think about it for a second. In the first film, immediatly after Ben's death, Peter went after Uncle Ben's killer (or so he thought). But in 3 it turns out William Baker (aka Flint Marko) is the real killer. Could it be that because Peter didn't find the right guy, that he feels reasponsible in some way for the creation of Sandman? Because he didn't get rid of him earlier.
Just a different way of looking at it.
Just a different way of looking at it.