LOL
I think the same many people say that this movie didn´t needed venom, and that the main story was about sandman (or him and the vulture at some point)... but i think the movie would have been better without him, just harry (don´t give me this "new goblin ****"... he WASN´T a goblin at all) and venom
there would have been more time for black spiderman and venom heck they could have even been able to to add JJ jameson son as the one that brought venom to earth
why did they introduced him in SM2 and not use the "astronaut" character in this?
Yeah I know about that argument, its dumb. You don't think that Raimi could flesh out Venom with enough screen time? Thats bull****. And if the Sandman story is just more of the same crap of him actually killed Ben, trying to get money for his daughter's illness, just keep it out of the movie altogether please. We don't need another sympathetic villain that we can understand how it was all an accident and bad luck for the guy. I liked Doc Ock in SM2, but we don't need another villain like that again, especially if its not going to be developed more, which there was no way it was in this movie with two other villains. Keep him out, focus more on the origins of the symbiote, and focus more on Harry and his father, etc.
People say removing Venom would solve the problems the film has, but then we would be left with a rehash of SM2. Peter goes against a villain who was created by accident, who really isn't a bad guy, just wrong place wrong time, motive was for curing his daughter's illness. Its all so similar to Doc Ock from the second movie. And then of course Harry wants revenge, just like in the second movie. Theres no Venom, so throw out Eddie Brock and Gwen Stacy. And yeah, your pretty much left with another SM2. Same basic storyline recycled, just with a different main villian. Not that it was a bad movie, far from it, just it wouldn't really be a sequel as far as taking it up a notch.
But I can understand their argument to a degree. But in the end its like this: Venom is a big part of the Spider Man universe. He just is, no other way of saying it. Sooner or later he is going to be in one of these movies. Now I can compare to how Robin is viewed in the Batman universe, but thats not really fair because I am sure there are a helluva lot more people that like Venom than like Robin. The point is, that if done correctly, Venom could work in a Spiderman movie, same as Robin could work in a Batman movie and still be good. SM3 is not an example of doing Venom correctly in a movie.