TMOS Set & Official Photo Thread - Discussion Welcome - Part 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

How come Legendary's name or producers aren't credited at all on the GL cast & crew listing, or in the film?

Does it have something to do with that profit-sharing dispute? Did they remove their name from the film because of that? :huh:
 
They were originally involved in the project.
 
As I said in the thread your question belongs in... Looks like speculative logic rather than news to me.
 
As I said in the thread your question belongs in... Looks like speculative logic rather than news to me.

Tell me more.
My interpretation...

If the “rumblings” about Kal-El being royalty come from a trusted source who’s seen the script or some footage, that would be “news.” But if it’s a deduction based on the notion that other elements of Flyby, etc. have been incorporated into MOS (therefore the “royalty thing” will be too), then that’s “speculative logic.”
 
My interpretation...

If the “rumblings” about Kal-El being royalty come from a trusted source who’s seen the script or some footage, that would be “news.” But if it’s a deduction based on the notion that other elements of Flyby, etc. have been incorporated into MOS (therefore the “royalty thing” will be too), then that’s “speculative logic.”

Yeah. I get it. It was sarcasm.
 
At Showtime Hero Hype we can't comment objectively on "articles" if they are from TMT. I see. Oh don't worry, it was just sarcasm.
 
At Showtime Hero Hype we can't comment objectively on "articles" if they are from TMT. I see. Oh don't worry, it was just sarcasm.

Well...it IS a forum the last time I checked? So if you're going to comment on ANYTHING...any of the other POSTERS have a right to comment. Whether they be moderators or otherwise.

You obviously have some weird interest or disinterest with me or my online persona, which is both intriguing and frightening. You've admitted to openly trolling in this section under other handles to throw some not so subtle jabs at me and Jamie. I obviously let you stay and didn't ban you, so I can't really have that much ill will towards you. So is this really Showtime Hero Hype?

I'm waiting for all the posters here that agree with you about how I really come down hard on the posters here and don't let them have opinions.
 
Well...it IS a forum the last time I checked? So if you're going to comment on ANYTHING...any of the other POSTERS have a right to comment. Whether they be moderators or otherwise.

You obviously have some weird interest or disinterest with me or my online persona, which is both intriguing and frightening. You've admitted to openly trolling in this section under other handles to throw some not so subtle jabs at me and Jamie. I obviously let you stay and didn't ban you, so I can't really have that much ill will towards you. So is this really Showtime Hero Hype?

I'm waiting for all the posters here that agree with you about how I really come down hard on the posters here and don't let them have opinions.

Of course you have a right to comment. No I don't think you are being a tyrant, it was just a knock back cause you got sarcastic with me in a way I felt was out of left field. It just seems that you got rather defensive and as you put it sarcastic, when I stated that the info sounds like speculation and logic, rather than concrete fact obtained from a direct source.

It is not a personal insult to you. If the report came from TMT, or latino review presented in the same way I'm going to have the same thoughts.

Things can turn out to be true based on speculative logic, and they can turn out to be false. 50/50 chance. As some other posters pointed out stories like Hamm being cast as Superman, only an American being cast, only an older Superman being cast, established story not an origin,Robinov hating Cavill and won't let him be cast, Nolan's brother directing story, etc... There are more...

You can be a bit defensive when people question stuff from your site, but at the same time you can be quick to dismiss (though I don't group you in with your partner who is way worse about that... 90% worse) info from other sites or people very HARSHLY.

When you release articles sometimes expect some controversy. It isn't a bad thing for your traffic or you wouldn't post them in the first place right?

You'd be surprised at the amount of pm's or messages I received in agreement from people who feel the same.

Would this off topic article post have even been allowed to stay in the photo section from another site? eh moving on
 
WB asking for the description to be taken down makes it real, imo. It could have been a reel from Double Negative (also working on MoS).
 
Wonder if the report was a strategic "oops", or just an oops, and somebdody could be getting in big trouble
 
Yeah could have been planted happens all the time, like with the Batman Begins script leak
 
Just subscribing. Nothing to see here...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"