R
ROBOCOP CPU001
Guest
xwolverine2 said:so....... are you psychic?
for all we know he couldve left because of the story too.
![]()
No i just read alot.

xwolverine2 said:so....... are you psychic?
for all we know he couldve left because of the story too.
![]()
xwolverine2 said:so....... are you psychic?
for all we know he couldve left because of the story too.
![]()
Cinemaman said:I think you have problems.
Robo is right and thats all.
ROTFLMFAO!!!...If, after watching Superman Returns, Jason White turns out to really be Superman's son, I will eat, on webcam, my unopened first-print issue of the the Death of Superman.Every page, cover to cover.
clearly...I think you have problems.
hes wrong too.... everyone assumes too much!Robo is right and thats all.
Cinemaman said:There are news, which were confirmed. Ratner was really going to make it. But WB wanted another director with sense, they prefered more Singer than MCG or Ratner.
xwolverine2 said:ROTFLMFAO!!!...
clearly...
hes wrong too.... everyone assumes too much!
Wesyeed said:how did this **** get to four pages?
venom420 said:I've despised Ratner ever sense I read this qoute from him.......
" F^ck me for trying to take a boring character and make it watchable "
No Brett, f^ck you.
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:Because all of us keep posting in it?![]()
who cares... its rightTopdawg said:When did he say that?
O RLY?I'd buy that for a dollar.
Wesyeed said:I'd buy that for a dollar.
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!Kane said:
That's what I was thinking. That's why DC's movies aren't as good as Marvel, not that I'm being a jerk but, WB really doesn't care, and even though SR looks good, if Ratner did it, it would've been a faithful to the comics newJakomus said:So Bryan Singer was chosen because he was cheaper.
Are movies made for entertainment these days?![]()
Morgoth said:That's what I was thinking. That's why DC's movies aren't as good as Marvel, not that I'm being a jerk but, WB really doesn't care, and even though SR looks good, if Ratner did it, it would've been a faithful to the comics newmovie, not this Singer stuff, Ratner's X-men is so much more like the comic, it feels like the X-men, singer's mutant movies wee just some dull movies where once again he threw out who and what they are, and just did his own thing.
Not once did I say Ratner had an 'overwhelming talent'. I'm just saying people on this board are quick to bash any other concept for a Superman movie.Nivek said:Or possibly we could just recognise Ratner as an par average director who's has no real style of his own? Ratner has a couple more films than Singer, and hasn't made three films on par with X2, Usual Suspects, or Apt Pupil. But he did make Rush Hour, Family Man, and After the Sunset.
Yeah, I guess Ratners overwhelming talent intimidates us...
![]()
It looked like it would be a great movie. It changed a lot about the Superman mythos, but I can honestly say I would have enjoyed it.xwolverine2 said:how was abrams script anyways?
i wouldnt know what was in the supes mytho so i cant judge abrams scriptJakomus said:It looked like it would be a great movie. It changed a lot about the Superman mythos, but I can honestly say I would have enjoyed it.
Stuff like Krypton not exploding, his suit is a living being, you know, massive changes. Like how Cyclops isn't a large part of the Phoenix saga in X-Men 3.xwolverine2 said:i wouldnt know what was in the supes mytho so i cant judge abrams script![]()