Superman Returns Ratner talks Superman!

Retroman

Avenger
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Messages
20,983
Reaction score
11
Points
33
Great new interview (spotted by narrows101) where Brett Ratner talkes about SR and the JJ Abrams script he was going to direct.I took out all the superman related bits from the interview.

From Chud.com

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: BRETT RATNER
07.30.06
By Devin Faraci


Q: Whether or not it was on purpose or not, there was a sense of competition with you taking on X3, Bryan taking on Superman and the two films coming out in the same general time frame. X3 is one of the biggest hits of the year, but Superman isn’t doing as well as they hoped. What happened? What went wrong?

Ratner: I think good luck comes from good ideas. X3 is a good ****ing idea. Superman – and I started to feel this a little bit when I was in the process of making it – seems like less and less of a good idea. Contemporizing that, and the fact that there were five – I would get from a lot of people, ‘Oh, are you making Superman 7?’ From a lot of people. The studio probably thought that would benefit, but the fact that is that you have to revitalize a franchise. It’s almost like what happened with Red Dragon. Hannibal was a huge hit, but it burned a lot of the women because it was so violent. More violent than Silence of the Lambs. It burned a lot of people from the franchise. A lot of people didn’t turn out for that – even though it was a huge hit. I’m not complaining about it, but it wasn’t as big as Hannibal.

Because of the poor performances of the bad Supermans there was a stigma on it. That was the problem – how do you take that and contemporize it? It’s very difficult, and I think JJ [Abrams] had a brilliant interpretation of that story. I don’t know if you read that script?

Q: I didn’t.

Ratner: I thought it was brilliant because it showed something that could have happened previous to the mythology that people knew. It said that Superman’s father had this brother and they were the two leaders of Krypton and there was this civil war on the planet. 40 minutes of the movie took place on Krypton. We were going to build a ****ing planet! That makes it worthwhile to make a Superman movie! People would have been like, ‘Holy ****, this is mindblowing!’ Unfortunately it was too expensive – my version going in was 260 to 280 million dollars. And if you go in there you know you’re going to end up over 300.

Q: Can Hollywood keep sustaining these bigger budgets? Pirates is doing amazing business, but so many movies have huge budgets and are not going to be able to make back what was spent on them, let alone turn a profit in theaters. The money Superman’s made now would have been a blockbuster years ago.

Ratner: I think what’s going to happen is that they’re going to keep getting bigger and bigger and a lot of people are going to get burned. Companies will go out of business. It’s cyclical. There’s going to be our version of - what’s that movie Cimino did? The movie that buried -

Q: Heaven’s Gate.

Ratner: Heaven’s Gate! There’s going to be our version of that.
Q: Harry Knowles has come up a couple of times. Have you met him?

Ratner: I might have my facts a little bit off, but I think this is true. You can post this and see if he responds – he probably won’t, because he’s too busy with whatever he’s doing.

I think Harry Knowles is a complete hypocrite. That’s my personal opinion of him, because he’s become a different guy. I met him over the internet in 1996 or 7, when they first started. Somebody told me there was this cool guy doing reviews and I went to check him out. Nobody in Hollywood knew about him. What I’m saying, if my facts are straight, is that Quentin Tarantino was the person who knew and maybe Quentin told me about him.

I don’t remember how I got introduced to Harry. But I started emailing the guy, because I love movies. That’s all I know! I know ****. I started talking to him – ‘Did you see this one,’ ‘Yeah, tell me what you think!’ When I would see a movie I would write in, but he never printed my reviews because I’m a filmmaker.


Q: Did you have anything out yet?

Ratner: This was before Money Talks! I wasn’t even a ****ing feature director. I was a film student basically, doing music videos. I would do these ****ing emails back and forth with the guy and then we would start talking on the phone. And we would talk and talk and talk and talk and talk. For hours and hours and hours. This was before he had any influence, so I had no reason… this guy was my friend. I was the first guy. Nobody talked to this guy, you know what I’m saying?

I got $150,000 to direct Money Talks. I had negative $250,000 in the bank. Do you understand? I had no money. I had no money. I took the only money I had left and flew him and his fat ****ing father to ****ing LA. Him and his fat ****ing father to LA for the premiere of Money Talks. The first ****ing time Harry Knowles was in LA…


Q: And you flew him out there.

Ratner: I flew him out there. I brought him to LA. Now he might say, ‘Not true! In 1996 I blah blah,’ maybe Robert Rodriguez flew him to the set of El Mariachi, I don’t know. All I know is I remember putting him in the ****ing Mondrian Hotel, him and his father. I got a limousine to ****ing drive his ass to my premiere for no other reason than I liked talking movies with this guy and I wanted to know what he thought.

Now if I recall – it wasn’t like he said, ‘I love this movie, you’re an amazing filmmaker,’ I don’t know if those words were said, but he wrote a whole rave review for Money Talks. I don’t remember if I brought him out for Rush Hour, but I know one thing, and you can do the research and look in the archives – the review on Rush Hour was even ****ing better. The biggest blow job you ever read in your ****ing life. Because he really liked it. I was not the hack I am today.

Then I did Family Man. I don’t remember if it was good or bad, but I wasn’t angry with him because I was still his friend. I would never have gotten into it. Then one day I got a call and they wanted to hire me for Superman. I call up Harry and say, ‘Guess what, I’m doing Superman!’ And he was like [gasps]. I was like, ‘Why are you so shocked?’ ‘I don’t know, I just duhduhduh, duhduhduh.’


Q: And this is after Rush Hour 2?

Ratner: Yes! This is his territory. The minute I go into Superman and I told him, ‘I’m going to hire you as a consultant on the movie because you know every Superman comic book.’ I read those growing up, but I don’t retain that stuff the way that Zak and Simon [Kinberg] does. I’m a different kind of pop culture [guy]. I said, ‘I want you as a consultant.’ He says, ‘Thank you, thank you very much!’ The next time I read a review – and it might have been of the JJ Abrams script – it says I called him up and said I never heard of Superman, who’s Superman?

Who is Superman? You have to be from another ****ing planet not to know. There’s not a person on Earth – [to an extra walking by] Have you heard of Superman, sir?


Man: Yeah.

Ratner: Miss, have you ever heard of Superman?

Woman: Yes.

Ratner: OK. He’s as famous as Jesus Christ. I don’t think there’s a pop character – and this guy said I called him to say I don’t know who he was. Complete ****ing lies. That was it. I don’t know what I did but get that job.

Now I don’t recall – did he say, ‘Thank God Brett’s off, McG’s going to come save the day?’ How can he take a guy with one movie – I’m not knocking McG! He’s my friend! But how do you ****ing take McG and say that ‘It’s obvious from Charlie’s Angels that he’s going to do a better job than Brett Ratner on Superman’.


Q: At least you have a full name.

Ratner: [laughs] Exactly. It’s crazy!

Q: And it’s been…

Ratner: Ever since.

Q: There’s been no contact?

Ratner: I’ve called him at least five times and he won’t return my calls. But I think Harry Knowles has much less influence. Did you see what happened on X-Men, where there was this great review from Moriarty? Simon Kinberg took him to the movie, he loved the movie. Then what’s his name saw the movie, Harry saw it, and said, ‘It’s the worst piece of **** ever made.’ He completely wrote this whole scathing thing that Moriarty’s wrong, he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. And all the TalkBacks…

Q: Please tell me you don’t read the TalkBacks.

Ratner: I don’t. But they tell me. I don’t read any of this ****. But the studio reads every ****ing word.
Source: http://www.chud.com/index.php?type=interviews&id=7251
 
Ratner must hate Harry. ha ha ha
 
Wesyeed said:
Ratner must hate Harry. ha ha ha
Thats an understatement.:D
What i think is more disturbing is that he wanted Knowles as a consultant to the movie and it was gonna cost up 300 million bucks to make.
 
Superman is a difficult character to handle. Though my disappointment and outright disgust with Singer will never fade, I don't think Ratner would have been the "better" choice. Definitely there would have been more action, but he's a really horrible storyteller. Singer has him in spades in that department...le sigh.
 
charl_huntress said:
Superman is a difficult character to handle. Though my disappointment and outright disgust with Singer will never fade, I don't think Ratner would have been the "better" choice. Definitely there would have been more action, but he's a really horrible storyteller. Singer has him in spades in that department...le sigh.

Wow, I can't believe that you are dissappointed with Singer. I feel he did a good job with Superman. Its hard to create something that everyone knows about, its like trying to re-invent the wheel. Singer did his take on Superman and I feel that he did a good job. I hope that he gets a shot to do the sequel. If the sequel is horrible then I will state that Singer messed up Superman.
 
gimmen64 said:
Wow, I can't believe that you are dissappointed with Singer. I feel he did a good job with Superman. Its hard to create something that everyone knows about, its like trying to re-invent the wheel. Singer did his take on Superman and I feel that he did a good job. I hope that he gets a shot to do the sequel. If the sequel is horrible then I will state that Singer messed up Superman.
but thats the problem.he made a good job not the best job.
 
All of a sudden..i like Ratner.

**** harry knowles..guys a prick!
 
I don't see how Ratner can be so smug about X3. It wasn't as if he set up the franchise. He's riding off the success of the previous two movies which Singer made, ironically enough. It would have been more impressive had he started the X-Men movie franchise instead of Singer.

As for Ratner v Knowles - they're both idiots. Who cares?
 
yes, they are both idiots... I hope they never get another chance to do Superman.
 
Monkey Chops said:
I don't see how Ratner can be so smug about X3. It wasn't as if he set up the franchise. He's riding off the success of the previous two movies which Singer made, ironically enough. It would have been more impressive had he started the X-Men movie franchise instead of Singer.

As for Ratner v Knowles - they're both idiots. Who cares?
He didn't sound smug to me. You just dont' like hearing the truth.
 
Monkey Chops said:
I don't see how Ratner can be so smug about X3. It wasn't as if he set up the franchise. He's riding off the success of the previous two movies which Singer made, ironically enough. It would have been more impressive had he started the X-Men movie franchise instead of Singer.


I disagree. Where is this "smugness" you speak of? :confused:

I thought his points carried a lot of validity. Truth is, there is a somewhat "played out" stigma attached to the Superman franchise. Brett merely put it in perspective. X-Men--for the time being--has a more raw, fresh appeal that broader audiences can identify with. In other words, it's the concept of racial and social equality along with other principles that sells X-Men. It's bigger than any one director's prowess.

As far as Brett's treatment of X3: It wasn't perfect. But at least those characters finally got to do what the X-Men are beloved for: waging war. My instincts tell me that that would have never happened under Bryan's care...he always plays it too safe by heading for romanticized treatments.

And that's what he did with SR.
 
I am not a fan of Harry Knowles and agree that he is a complete hypocrite, but Ratner comes off as a COMPLETE A$$HOLE in this interview.

"I had left and flew him and his fat ****ing father to ****ing LA. Him and his fat ****ing father to LA for the premiere of Money Talks. The first ****ing time Harry Knowles was in LA…"

What a major ****ing tool. :down:
 
Lighthouse said:
I am not a fan of Harry Knowles and agree that he is a complete hypocrite, but Ratner comes off as a COMPLETE A$$HOLE in this review.

"I had left and flew him and his fat ****ing father to ****ing LA. Him and his fat ****ing father to LA for the premiere of Money Talks. The first ****ing time Harry Knowles was in LA…"

What a major ****ing tool. :down:

They are both slices cut from the same nasty pie.

Harry has said far worse about Brett--and he's been bashing him for months. The latter has been silent up until X3's release and is just now speaking up on the matter.

I say they call it even and make up. :cool:
 
Lightning Strikez! said:
They are both slices cut from the same nasty pie.

Harry has said far worse about Brett--and he's been bashing him for months. The latter has been silent up until X3's release and is just now speaking up on the matter.

I say they call it even and make up. :cool:
I'm not defending Harry. His incredible bias and hypocricy still constantly amazes me. He's about as independent as Anne Coulter. I guess I'm agreeing with Monkey Chops. "they're both idiots. Who cares?"
 
Knowles once compared Neo from the Matrix to Osama Bin Laden, nuff said!
 
Lighthouse said:
I'm not defending Harry. His incredible bias and hypocricy still constantly amazes me. He's about as independent as Anne Coulter. I guess I'm agreeing with Monkey Chops. "they're both idiots. Who cares?"

They might both be idiots but at least one of the idiots is producing something for the industry instead of "reviewing" other peoples work. What I'm saying is that one of them has a real job.
 
nosebleed said:
They might both be idiots but at least one of the idiots is producing something for the industry instead of "reviewing" other peoples work. What I'm saying is that one of them has a real job.


Good point. :up:

Thousands of people report to Brett in these productions--and he's ultimately held responsible for all of those departments' quality of work.

Harry doesn't have an inch of that kind of responsibility in maintaining his "online presence". :rolleyes:
 
matthooper said:
Knowles once compared Neo from the Matrix to Osama Bin Laden, nuff said!
Pretty strange but whats even stranger is that he liked the awful Matrix sequels.

In response to your sig:

The guy who interviewed Ratner seems to agree with you on BB.
 
Lighthouse said:
I am not a fan of Harry Knowles and agree that he is a complete hypocrite, but Ratner comes off as a COMPLETE A$$HOLE in this interview.

"I had left and flew him and his fat ****ing father to ****ing LA. Him and his fat ****ing father to LA for the premiere of Money Talks. The first ****ing time Harry Knowles was in LA…"

What a major ****ing tool. :down:
he comes off as being pissed, if you were treated by someone like that who you thought was a friend , i guess your reaction would be similar.
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
All of a sudden..i like Ratner.
I've loved Ratner ever since I heard he decked Jon Peters. LMFAO!!!!
Damn, I wish I was there to hear the birds chirp. :(

And I still haven't seen X3 yet. *sigh*
All hail the home video gods.
 
AgentPat said:
And I still haven't seen X3 yet. *sigh*
All hail the home video gods.

Stewart and McKellan were the best parts of the movie IMO. I'll buy it...but then again I buy everything. V comes out tomorrow.
 
AgentPat said:
I've loved Ratner ever since I heard he decked Jon Peters. LMFAO!!!!
Damn, I wish I was there to hear the birds chirp. :(

And I still haven't seen X3 yet. *sigh*
All hail the home video gods.



Is that true??

LOL!!

i like him even more now.. i don't think we hould hate a person just because he is into what he does.
 
AgentPat said:
I've loved Ratner ever since I heard he decked Jon Peters. LMFAO!!!!
Damn, I wish I was there to hear the birds chirp. :(

And I still haven't seen X3 yet. *sigh*
All hail the home video gods.
I didn't know he decked him, I thought they almost came to a fight but never did.
 
and I think JJ [Abrams] had a brilliant interpretation of that story.

I've officially lost all respect for Bret Ratner. Sorry, but Abrams' script was NOT Superman.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"