Meh. Outside of playing multiplayer MAYBE four times back in 2004, I know nothing about Halo. In fact, the first time I ever read the words "Master Chief", I misread it as "Master Chef" and that's been his name to me ever since, lol.
same, haha
I hope you get a chance FC. It isn't UC2, but it is still a hell of a lot of fun.
I think you are missing the point of using the character's name. You do that to distinguish games in the same series with different protagonist. Because there is only one main character in Uncharted, it is simply Uncharted.
I find UC1 to be great building block, with fantastic story and characters. But I always found the gameplay more then a bit frustrating. It is why I waited so long to play UC2. On the flip side, UC3 is a smooth as butter in terms of GP, even if it lacks the variety, pacing and quality set pieces of UC2.
The only good thing about that final chapter. So disappointing.
you've made your point, man. trust me, I get it. like I said, even if there were spinoff uncharted games with a different protagonist, they still probably wouldn't call it the nathan drake collection. but i don't think it's a big deal that I am.
honestly what killed the ending of the game for me...[BLACKOUT]I suppose I should put it in spoilers since some people here didn't play it yet. when nate shot down the giant genie lamp, I was expecting the genie to come out of it and THAT be the epic final boss fight of the game. instead... we don't even have one and just have a qte fight with talbot. pretty much everything else about the game (aside from the endless waves of enemies) imo was an improvement over Uc2.[/BLACKOUT]The only good thing about that final chapter. So disappointing.
the remaster would also be a great way for people who never got to play uncharted on Ps3 who bought a Ps4, to jump in. although if they also use psNow it could be a bit of a confusing endeavor for 'em.
tbh, some games are great linearly, and some are great with more option. different games suit different methods/executions. but I can understand if you/someone wouldn't feel it.
yeah dude the whole game is phenomenal. AND it had splitscreen, I loved that it had that - if only it had a coop campaign mode!!! but the fact that they had a splitscreen at all was great. just the ending was lackluster.
I had the same exact thought. That it then ended up in a [BLACKOUT]crappy QTE segment[/BLACKOUT] never sat well with me.
The repeated use of the brutes is so annoying. As are the repetitive set pieces. UC2 has newand different set pieces that you play differently level after level. UC3 reuses the same mechanics over and over again.
you and me both pal. but no game, or story for that matter, has had an ending worse than Me3 and the ME trilogy as a whole. so there's that, aha.
brutes? are those the heavy armored guys with the shotguns? I guess I'm a bit rusty with my Uc3 memories as I didn't play through it as much as Uc2. there musta been a few more things that made people believe Uc2>Uc3.
Now compare that to Among Thieves. It just isn't close imo. UC2 have some of the best chapters/sections I have ever experienced in video games.
The big guys you punch it out with. Every enemy faction had their own version of them. Really bad in terms common sense and gameplay. Then they used the new "chase" gameplay multiple time. It was great as [BLACKOUT]little Drake[/BLACKOUT], but then they used it at least two more times.
Did you ever play the Citadel DLC?
nope, but the whole concept behind it bothered the hell out of me. i thought it was gonna be the a big post-ending dlc... but it wasn't and there was none.
