Dark Knight
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2001
- Messages
- 15,490
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
The more I think about it.....the more I keep thinking Robin Williams would be a kick ass mobster/club owner type Cobblepot/Penguin!
may sound dumb to some but I always thought he'd make a good Detective John Jones.Perhaps anybody for David Bowie in the series? I loved him as Tesla in Prestige, and think it'd be awesome to see him in another Nolan film; if not, one of his Batman films.
![]()
Catwoman- as love interest/anti heroine/wildcard, not a TRUE villain per say.
Riddler- as the heavy baddie.
Black Mask- as a heavy baddie, cultish dark mob boss.
Cobblepot/Penguin- as a minor supporting villain as shady underworld/club owner/mob boss/arms dealer
Deadshot- in a minor, yet important supporting villain role as the mysterious hitman/assassin hired to kill Batman by Black Mask and who is his muscle.
Deadshot and Penguin in supporting roles much like how Scarecrow, Earle, Falcone and Maroni were used in BB and TDK.
The more I think about it.....the more I keep thinking Robin Williams would be a kick ass mobster/club owner type Cobblepot/Penguin!
Another reason Deathstroke would be good, is because I don't think going the "psycho" villlain route again would be as effective. They've already used Batman's two greatest psychotic villains (Joker and Two-Face), and nobody is going to top Heath Ledger's Joker, so I prefer it if they went with a sane but deadly badass like Slade.
I think the multiple villain per thing is getting a bit played out. Two-Face deserved to be more than a relatively minor sideshow (and I thought Aaron Eckhart did a great job) to the Joker in The Dark Knight. A bad guy the level of Two-Face should be the main villain in the film.
My personal feeling. One villlain this time. And I'm not sure any of Batman's regular rogues gallery cut the mustard in Nolan-verse. Do people really want to see Johnny Depp as The Riddler camping it up in Nolan-verse like it's a Tim Burton fantasy?
I think Batman needs a realistic villain, who is a mastermind/intellect, as well as a physical equal to Batman (so we can actually get some decent fight scenes, not Batman kicking the ass of some henchmen).
No offence, but if Nolan were to only use one villain in B3, it most certainly would not be a minor villain who is primarily from a different series. Besides the fact that most people will have never heard of him, a "sane" lone villain would seem like a huge anti-climax for the finalé, in my opinion at least.
As opposed to another "psycho" who would inevitably be regarded as a poor man's Heath Ledger?
Who the cares if "most people" have never heard of Deathstroke.
I think that mentality is justifiable considering that Batman 3 will be a cash-grab, anyways. However, I do not agree with throwing just any villain into the movie without proper thought, which, I am assuming is not your
outlook, either.
![]()
You seem to be tarring every "psycho" villain with the same brush here. Just because they are insane does not mean they would be compared to Heath's Joker. The Riddler, for example, could be explored in an entirely different way to The Joker.As opposed to another "psycho" who would inevitably be regarded as a poor man's Heath Ledger?
Quite frankly, I'm sure the Producers would care. Ra's Al Ghul is a different story, he was never promoted or pushed into the publicity side because, like you said, nobody knew who he was, but the producers could rely on the excitement of a Batman reboot, and the Scarecrow, to draw people. Quite frankly, if all the producers had to rely on this time around to publicise B3 was one villain; Deathstroke, then I would imagine they'd find this hard to contend with. How do you publicise a movie on the back of a villain that nobody has heard of, and so, would not care about?Who the cares if "most people" have never heard of Deathstroke. Outside of hardcore comic fans, nobody had heard of Ra's Al Ghul, and he was the main villain of the first movie. Deathstroke works in the context of Nolanverse, and that's what matters most. People will know him after they see him.
As far as I'm concerned, Deathstroke can do whatever the hell he likes with the JLA, and whoever such he takes on. That fact he is considered so "awesome" by a niché group of fans does not make him quality material to be used in the third and finale Nolan Batman movie. Plus, at the end of the day, people will want to see a full on Batman villain, not a guy who dips his toes into every DC comic going. I'm sure Batman fans would rather have any villain from the bulk of Batman's rogues gallery than Deathstroke be the core villain for B3.Deathstroke is not a "minor villain". These days, he doesn't even really belong specfically to the Titans rogue gallery. He's considered so awesome, that he's basically a general "DC Universe" villain, like Darkseid. Deathstroke takes on the likes of the JLA.....and beats them, alone. Deathstroke is one of the most respected and feared DC universe villains. And he does usually beat Batman. He is a Batman villain as well...he's just enough of a threat to be everyone else's villain as well, which most of Batman's gallery are not.
Again, you're painting all the insane villains with the same brush. Just because they're psycho's does not mean they would be overshadowing Batman at every turn. To use The Riddler as an example yet again, he could easily be used as foil to explore Batman's mentality. If Scarecrow were re-used (though 99% won't be) again, so much of Batman could be explored through fears, etc. So to re-iterate my point, just because they're insane, doesn't mean that they will be automatically overshadowing Batman.And frankly, Christian Bale/Batman doesn't need to be overshadowed by another nutjob. Batman Begins was one of the strongest portrayals of Batman/Bruce Wayne, because were weren't paying too much attention to a scene stealing psycho. Batman felt like a supporting character in The Dark Knight. I want to see another film that's actually about Batman, not one of his nutjobs. So yeah, I'd like them to go back for a relatively sane bad guy like Ra's Al Ghul.
I completely agree on the notion that Nolan should steer clear of going out of his way to be "bigger" or "more epic" than the last movies. That's almost always a kiss of death. And I can also agree on the idea that a duality theme would be very interesting, though already done before with Ra's. And as previously mentioned, a psychological study on Bats could be achieved with numerous Batman villains; Catwoman, Riddler, Scarecrow, even Bane, as he could be considered pretty much the same fodder as Deathstroke; intelligent and deadly.I don't think it'd be anti-climatic at all. Nolan could play on the whole duality theme from the other films, and have Deathstroke and Wayne play as mirror images of each other....it can be intimate and more of a physocological study of Bruce again. I don't think they should try and go "bigger" or more "epic" with the third movie. That usually ends up in disappointment (see X-Men: The Last Stand or Spider-Man 3, where they seemed to think bigger equalled better. And they were the worst films of the series).
I think Deathstroke works a bit better because his whole military/mercenary background and the fact that he's much older than Bruce, makes him an ideal "mentor" figure for Bruce, giving their relationship more meaning. I don't think I would like to see them making Bane one of Wayne's teachers or mentors, as they are a similar age.