Dread
TMNT 1984-2009
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 21,788
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I agree. Actually, one of the things that always gets me is how everyone talks about how much more of a "bad-arse" Cyclops became after he was merged with Apocalypse. The thing that gets me is, I saw the Apocalypse-mergence as an excuse for plenty of writers since to write Cyclops, at least at times, as the "bad arse" he was during the end of the Silver Age.roach said:exactly...you want a more heroic Cyke...then stop writing him as Emma's *****. You want him to be in the forefront then write him in the forefront.....taking away his one iconic image is stupid. Why dont we take away Cap's shield while we are at it
Confused? Read some of the X-Men stuff post GIANT SIZE #1. Cyclops is the resident leader X-Man, and he's hardcore. When Wolverine gives him too much grief, he BACKHANDS him. If some training situation or psychic bad guy forces Cyclops to spar against his fellow teammates, he often prevailed, even when being piled on by the likes of Colossus, Nightcrawler, Rogue and Wolverine. When Magneto threw the new team a beating, Cyclops was going all "experience/prep time" to hold his own so they could regroup. And so forth and so on.
But then the mid or late 80's happened and Cyclops had time away doingf stuff with X-FACTOR and whatever, and other characters rose in popularity like Storm, Rogue, and especially Wolverine. And by the time the 90's hit full on, Wolverine and other characters led the popularity charts while Cyclops just became the leader-man who pointed at the target in the background. He took a back-seat.
The mergence with Apocalypse gave writers aftwards, like Morrison, Casey, et al an easy excuse to write a more "hardened" Cyclops, when in reality he always was a bit hard and efficient, he'd just spent about 15+ years stepping back so Wolverine, Gambit, etc. could be Mr. Cool without competition. Plus, they fit the "trenchcoat and grit" motif of the 90's.
FYI, Cap also had some trials and tribulations with his shield during the 90's. Anyone remember that hokey "energy shield" he had for a bit?
While I have no allusions that a "visorless Cyclops" would last very long, I do agree with a lot of the criticisms. Without that vulnerability, Cyclops becomes "just another energy shooter". And if one wants to evolve Cyclops, it's the character, not the powers, that do it. Powers are just there to advance the plot. The character him/herself is part of what drives the narrative. In truth I could list a half dozen X-Men with capable, controllable energy powers. But if they don't have clear character distinctions, then they're not worth writing about, they're just names and a trading card bio. But too often when writers want to "advance" someone, they choose the powers. Just look at Spider-Man. Over the past 2 years he's gotten a laundry list of new powers, from claws to enhanced strength to "controlling spiders" and lord knows what else, but has it really advanced the character? Has he even used 'em? Even when Superman was "revamped" in the 90's and got big media attention, what'd they do? Give him new powers and an electro-design.
Many characters in comics or stories in general have that one hook or twist that propells them, and Marvel characters are no exception. Why do we believe this is a bad thing? Thing's rock hide and the issues it gives him sometimes have allowed fans to like him for generations. Lord knows Wolverine's milked the "loner/rebel" thing for years to no one's chagrin. So now why is Cyclops' optic blasts something that needs to go? And if it reverts back to "normal", it always makes one ask, what was the bloody point? It's like with "Armored Spider-Man". Everyone goes, "well, it won't last". To that I ask, "then why string us along? Why not do something that improves the CHARACTER, not what he uses to punch someone out, and work on it, work on it really heard and think it through, so that it IS worth our time?" The visor is Cyclops' schtick, and naturally it's silly to abandon it to just tell all of your enemies about your new status, but whatever.
Hopefully whatever Whedon does with it, it is done well and enjoyably. Because while ASTONISHING X-MEN is still reabable and enjoyable, it's hardly been innovative after the first arc and is at times horribly overrated. I would hope that Whedon does something poingnant and effective with a book that has some of the best art, and the best roster, of the X-Universe.

) ?