Anjow1060 said:I've been talking to Jett about that EXACTLY that thing and he says its not gonna be small, as in a "cameo" or even small at all. Just very mysterious. But IMO, thats not the Joker we all know and love from the comics, as we were told we were getting.
Ronny Shade said:but figure this:
The Joker is an attention ****e. It's okay if his motives and origins are mysterious (I prefer that actuallly), but he shouldn't be lurking in shadows and hiding. That's just not like him.
thedarks0ldier said:Liam Neeson's characters could fit under the "small and mysterious" term
Like I said, wait and see. And remember they´re still working on the script.Ronny Shade said:but figure this:
The Joker is an attention ****e. It's okay if his motives and origins are mysterious (I prefer that actuallly), but he shouldn't be lurking in shadows and hiding. That's just not like him.
LOLraybia said:OMG, don't tell me that Joker is really...Ra's!
THAT WOULD SUCK!
Ronny Shade said:I don't want the Joker being reclusive. That's just unforgivable IMO.
It's a cliche because it works. Usually in most cases it totally sucks and is out of character for the villain and creates major cheese, I agree. but Joker is a different story. Take Return of the Joker for example. Works great. I love it.Babs Gordon said:but in the comic book movie world, don't you think that's getting a bit cliché? i suppose one could argue 'clichés be damned!'... i just want it done well and not 'comic booky' or cheesy. i can't see it done in a non-cheesy way. maybe it's just because i can't think outside the box at the moment.
raybia said:I like Hugo too but he seems to be getting a little overexposed.