People would hate mutants even more. It's just how "logic" operates in the marvel universe.
I think you're absolutely right. Did you read the X-Men tie-in to Secret Invasion? There were people who thought the X-Men were in on the alien invasion while the X-Men were saving them.
Basically. The average Marvel citizen, and in collections such as their Marvel media and political elite, have nothing but fear, contempt, paranoia, and hatred towards anyone who is genuinely noble regardless of what they are; mutants get the worst of it, but lord knows the Marvel public has turned on the Four or the Avengers for the flimsiest of reasons. Meanwhile, anyone who is genuinely wicked, so long as they make token promises to the people and basically are less obvious than, I don't know, Metal Master (an alien villain who would literally show up on Earth and declare himself ruler while going on a rampage), are usually beloved and trusted beyond most superheroes.
People criticize DC's society as being too slavish for superheroes, but let's think about this. In real life, athletes & big actors are treated like gods, and they almost have to murder a child on public access TV to be fired or dismissed by a majority of fans and the media. Same with many actors. Therefore, is it SO unrealistic than a genuine superhero would be treated at least 25% as well by the media as, say, one of the Baldwins? Plaxico Burress was a Super-Bowl hero; he also owned an illegal handgun, brought it to a club, and had his teammate as well as hospital staff cover it up when it accidentally fired. There were PLENTY in the media who just wanted him to get a slap on the wrist; and still feel it was "unfair" of him to plead guilty to serve 20 months (for a crime where mandatory sentencing in NYC is about 3 years). Again, he PLAYS FOOTBALL. You are telling me is it totally unrealistic for someone who genuinely saves the city and even the world wouldn't be privy to some at least sane media treatment? Come the **** on. Michael Vick is with the Eagles and we all know what he did, and you bet Eagles fans will cheer him on. But Captain America wouldn't ever get the benefit of any doubt. Please.
Now, maybe museums to honor superheroes is a bit much, but there must be some happy medium.
At any rate, had Wolverine defeated Veranke on National TV instead of Norman Osborn:
- The X-Men would be assumed to have been in on the Invasion.
- Wolverine would be wanted for murder, having assassinated Veranke without due process. It would be the only time in his 100+ year life anyone demanded accountability from him when he wasted someone.
- All superheroes by association with Wolverine would be considered Evil.
- Sabretooth would have been elected President.
- The same public that assumes police are always guilty in any shooting/arrest that involves anyone who is of ethnic minority would be perfectly happy with Sentinel robots destroying entire neighborhoods for the chance to kill a mutant in broad daylight without trial (regardless of the fact that there are many mutants who are themselves ethnic minorities, and Sentinels are often made/controlled by evil rich white men).
- Spider-Man would still happen to forget that he used to disapprove of Wolverine killing people. The 1990's actually at least got THAT right.
- Written by Bendis, all dialogue would still read like it was intended for Twitter or Text Messaging by people who are slow witted or deaf, not actual comics.
"Logan killed Veranke!"
"Killed?"
"Yes."
"Veranke?"
"Yes."
"Logan?"
"Yes."
"Yes?"
"Yes."
"Yahtzee!"
- The WOLVERINE film still would have underperformed.