What we know so far!!!

Sava · Apr 23, 2007

SpaghettiHULK said:
I'm sure... on this site or forum... somewhere!

really doubt that, 150 tops but i'm sure its around 120. Even i think 180 too much to spend on something this risky

Hunter Rider · Apr 23, 2007

Sava said:
thank you

I got C Lee to give the place a spring clean :up:

HULKFish · Apr 23, 2007

Where did the Aaron Sims part come from? I would like to read more into that... All that I've heard is R&H is doing the effects.

Sava · Apr 23, 2007

hunter rider said:
I got C Lee to give the place a spring clean

thanks to you and C.Lee then

Sava · Apr 23, 2007

HULKFish said:
Where did the Aaron Sims part come from? I would like to read more into that... All that I've heard is R&H is doing the effects.

LL said it, and here's his website .

SpaghettiHULK · Apr 23, 2007

Sava said:
really doubt that, 150 tops but i'm sure its around 120. Even i think 180 too much to spend on something this risky

there is something

http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=267330

but I'm still sure... that I've heard a clear "180", somewhere(maybe in my dreams :oldrazz:

)!

Sava · Apr 23, 2007

i remember that thread. Its good news either way.

HULKFish · Apr 23, 2007

Sava said:
LL said it, and here's his website .

WOW!!! I don't think we need worry about how good HULK will look!! I'M NOT WORTHY, I'M NOT WORTHY!! (bowing as wayne and garth would)

Ahura Mazda · Apr 24, 2007

Great thread Sava.

Would be nice if this was mad into a sticky, and posting was kept to just info.

ang_hulk · Apr 24, 2007

I doubt any prosthitics for hulk unless he grabs somone,mabey they would make a hulk hand but im sure/hoping hes all cgi again.

Sava · Apr 24, 2007

Ahura Mazda said:
Great thread Sava.

Would be nice if this was mad into a sticky, and posting was kept to just info.

yeah, i'm thinking of ask HR or C.Lee to make this thread that way.

ang_hulk said:
I doubt any prosthitics for hulk unless he grabs somone,mabey they would make a hulk hand but im sure/hoping hes all cgi again.

i'm thinking its either like you said, a hand or something like that but i think they'll us the prosthitics for transformation scenes.

SpaghettiHULK · Apr 24, 2007

the CGI/prosthetic effects will be very similar to those Davy Jones' from "Dead Man's Chest"

Hartter · Apr 24, 2007

Thw prosthetics that Spectral Motion did for Hellboy and the Fantastic Four were great...I personally would like to see a little more old school approach on this one. Abomination will be awesome...hopefully the Leader will show up.

Ed Norton is great, tho I though Bana was a scary bastard when he started getting Hulky.

R_3 · Apr 25, 2007

The Gigs said:
I don't know how I feel about the whole remake versus sequel idea. You cited "Casino Royale" style, but there wasn't a canon version of that flick so it was pretty much a new film. I just kinda wish they would pick up with the flick in South America with Banner on the run. It'd be the logical point, but hey, what the hizzy do i know, right?!?

I also would prefer if they'd go in the direction of a direct sequel. I guess because it almost makes it seem that the first should be ignored. For example, if they made another Terminator film, wouldn't they continue from where part 3 left off rather than recreate a new story?

Dangerous · Apr 25, 2007

The only thing I'm not loving and rather a little concerned about is the mix of prosthetics and CGI.

What is the point?
CGI is 100% authentic now, why risk something looking goofy w/ an animatronics shot?
In HULK the CGI was amazing and never looked dodgy, and now w/ films like Pan's Labyrinth CGI is flawless.

bearhulk · Apr 26, 2007

Hello there people, umm they plan make film in toronto so i going to toronot cause i live London,ontario,Canada it's close toronot 2 hours from there so i ll see it YAHOOO GO :hulk:

GO!!!!!!!!! hope make it picture

kedrell · Apr 26, 2007

Dangerous said:
The only thing I'm not loving and rather a little concerned about is the mix of prosthetics and CGI.

What is the point?
CGI is 100% authentic now, why risk something looking goofy w/ an animatronics shot?
In HULK the CGI was amazing and never looked dodgy, and now w/ films like Pan's Labyrinth CGI is flawless.

My guess would be that it's a $ issue. If say in a particular scene you only see a small part of the Hulk(the focus would be on whoever he's facing/talking to/etc.), then why not use practical effects if they are significantly cheaper than CGI.

Steelsheen · Apr 26, 2007

kedrell said:
My guess would be that it's a $ issue. If say in a particular scene you only see a small part of the Hulk(the focus would be on whoever he's facing/talking to/etc.), then why not use practical effects if they are significantly cheaper than CGI.

agreed, if onscreen all we see of the Hulk is a foot, or a hand or shoulder, or him standing still, animatronics should suffice. CG only becomes invaluable when The Hulk has to move.

the tricky part of course is to make the difference between real and CG negligible, and that's easier said than done.

Golgo-13 · Apr 28, 2007

I'm actually loving the idea of mixing animatronics and cgi. There were some shots in Angs Hulk where you can tell that the Hulk couldn't be rendered right because of lighting, etc; it was just to hard, so it looked fake. The part where Hulk is standering over David Banner after his first transformation, when we get the back shot of him, comes to mind. In that instanced, animatronics would have worked perfectly and the lighting on the Hulks body would then be perfect.

So long as the animatronic don't involve anything involving the Hulk's face (like the god aweful effects for the Predators face in AVP) then it'll work.

SpaghettiHULK · Apr 28, 2007

Sava said:
really doubt that, 150 tops but i'm sure its around 120. Even i think 180 too much to spend on something this risky

Now, Imdb, reports a 186 millions budget for Iron Man.... But, how much for The Hulk??? :huh:

Only 125??? Nooooooo

Sava · Apr 28, 2007

SpaghettiHULK said:
Now, Imdb, reports a 186 millions budget for Iron Man.... But, how much for The Hulk???
Only 125??? Nooooooo

i really doubt that but i cant be sure, dont hang around the IM forums that much. Its all good that Marvel are willing to spend so much on IM and TIH but its still a bit too high IMO. BB, when it was first out, had a budget of 180mill and was later changed to 150. We'll never know for sure.

Obi-Ron · Apr 28, 2007

imdb can be less than reliable on details like this.

Sava · Apr 29, 2007

yeah, they had The Hulk at 125mill but BOMojo had Hulk at 132.

Antonello Blueberry · May 1, 2007

http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/...n-spin-off-incredible-hulk-casting-with-cine/
Interview with Zak Penn

As far as Hulk goes, Penn went into a lot of detail regarding his vision, and the way he approached the script. He squashed those gray Hulk rumors, saying Avi Arad "must have been mis-quoted," and there will not be a gray Hulk. And when I brought up further casting announcements, Penn said that we should be hearing some big news within the next few days. (Unfortunately, even though he had alcohol in his system, I couldn't get him to reveal any names.)

Weadazoid · May 2, 2007

in regards to the budget I think it was posted not so long ago that the budget may be around 120 million but because this is Marvels own little in house studio they can streach those dollars alot more and in terms of the way other movies get made 120 is alot closer to 180 Million

What we know so far!!!

Dont cry, my dear

Ronin

Author of Marlsbeth

Dont cry, my dear

Dont cry, my dear

Civilian

Dont cry, my dear

Author of Marlsbeth

Avenger

Sidekick

Dont cry, my dear

Civilian

Droog

Civilian

Avenger

Civilian

Fork&SpoonOperator

Head Geek of Nerdtopia

The Return of the O.G

Civilian

Dont cry, my dear

Deal with it

Dont cry, my dear

Inglorious bastard

Sidekick

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Share this page