what would you like to see in season 2 of Wolverine and the X-Men

An interesting idea, but do you really think the writers are even capable of doing that right?

I believe they are capable. Craig, Johnson, Yost & Co. are good writers capable of doing a lot with a little; what they are not on this show so far is consistent. But it certainly is possible.
 
I believe they are capable. Craig, Johnson, Yost & Co. are good writers capable of doing a lot with a little; what they are not on this show so far is consistent. But it certainly is possible.
I guess my real question is - do the writers actually care enough about Cyclops to do it right? So far, they apparently don't.
 
My logic is, they can't seem to get a handle on Cyclops as a hero in this series, at least in a way to make him sympathetic or efficient. Why not go the other way, since Scott's a hair away from being a bad guy anyway? You know one day Wolverine and Cyclops are due to fight in this series, and there is no way that is going to happen unless Cyclops is clearly working for a bad guy, because this show often has the character nuance of a ROYAL RUMBLE event. It might actually work. They once made Lance Alvers/Avalanche a decent character in EVOLUTION in the anti-hero role.
 
I think that's more of Dread's fan-******* in wanting Cyclops to have proverbial vengeance on the show by going bad because he was not satisfied with how Cyclops was treated in being a whipping boy of sorts in the story.

Fans have similar fan wank views of Naruto where they come up with ideas where Naruto suddenly becomes withdrawn and emo against the village of Konoha for shunning Naruto. Or Naruto starts insulting and hating Sakura for being a ***** to him when they were kids. **** like that.

I think Dread just has to deal with that the guys that made the show don't share the same views as him, not necessarily on Cyclops, but on how the story will evolve.

So more than anything it sounds like Dread's going with Cyclops, "Well guess what?! Payback time! You don't want me to be the hero or the leader so I'm going to be the big bad guy!"

Now obviously, in this new altered timeline you have the whole AoA scenario where Cyclops was "working" for Apocalypse, but in the comics that was all a ruse, but who knows how that will come up. But hey maybe Dread will get his wish and Cyclops will get a blast to crack at Wolverine's plot armor.

Its sort of out there because the season ends with Cyclops in a much better, more positive place. He got his piss and his girlfriend back, but there's still that lingering anguish over Emma. And maybe there's a conflict there if Emma comes back and is suddenly back in the picture again so suddenly Scott is dealing with both Jean and Emma like in Morrison's New X-men run.
 
Last edited:
I think that's more of Dread's fan-******* in wanting Cyclops to have proverbial vengeance on the show by going bad because he was not satisfied with how Cyclops was treated in being a whipping boy of sorts in the story.

You can see it that way. You will no matter how I explain myself. I see it as me being open to a new idea so long as it is handled well. That's always the key; execution. If Craig, Johnson & Yost are having a problem executing what they want for Cyclops given the format of the show, I am game for a more "out of the box" idea so long as it is handled well. I'd rather see him as a sympathetic villain then an unsympathetic hero.

TheVileOne said:
Fans have similar fan wank views of Naruto where they come up with ideas where Naruto suddenly becomes withdrawn and emo against the village of Konoha for shunning Naruto. Or Naruto starts insulting and hating Sakura for being a ***** to him when they were kids. **** like that.

Admittedly, I haven't watched NARUTO in quite some time. I lost interest during the "filler" arcs and haven't returned. I just always chuckled at the fundamental idea that the villagers of Konoha feared that Naruto would become a monster and destroy them all, yet by shunning him, all but encourage him to do so. It's akin to wanting to rid the world of the menace of the Hulk by continuing to chase and incite him. Thankfully for everyone, Naruto is too much of a slacker/wanna-be hero to do so.

TheVileOne said:
I think Dread just has to deal with that the guys that made the show don't share the same views as him, not necessarily on Cyclops, but on how the story will evolve.

I don't mind how the story evolves so long as it is executed well. The execution of this first season has been hit or miss at best. I just hope Season 2 improves on the writing aspect on all levels. Cyclops was just the one I usually found myself focusing on (and to be fair, he did get as much focus as Nightcrawler did).

TheVileOne said:
So more than anything it sounds like Dread's going with Cyclops, "Well guess what?! Payback time! You don't want me to be the hero or the leader so I'm going to be the big bad guy!"

That isn't it. Basically I want every major character to be handled well in a way that is entertaining and makes sense with what the TV show has presented (not theoretically from comic stuff that is never referenced and changed on a whim to mingle continuity with Ultimate and movie lore for the show's own unique history). Cyclops wasn't the only character who could have been handled better. Iceman was a cipher. Beast faded into background scenery after the first 4-6 episodes. Shadowcat is very close to a cipher herself. Jean is a walking Maguffin. The only sympathetic character on the team besides Wolverine was blown up. Wolverine himself is a satire of himself while being less of himself in the show's role for him who curiously is better in every episode he isn't the exclusive star of.

I am open to new ideas involving a few of them, including Cyclops. I'm not looking for him to wreck vengeance. Hell, if he became an outright villain in Season 2, he would eventually lose, so that doesn't fit your estimation. I simply am interested in him becoming a sympathetic character in some fashion. If not as a hero, then as a villain or anti-hero. I am merely open to the idea of a new tract for him, so long as it is handled well. X-MEN EVOLUTION forged ground on stuff that had never been imagined before, like a Scott/Rogue/Jean romantic triangle of all things. I believe once they get over their own fan-******* after being so held up by the network in EVOLUTION, they may get back to the sort of innovation and character stuff that made that show so watchable.

As a hero, Cyclops can't work in this series, at least that is what Season One showed. He's a Never-Was; he wasn't even a competent X-Man, much less a leader, before Logan rode along. He's inefficient. He's usually unmotivated. He is obsessed with Jean for pure ego-fulfillment, to the point of near anime-level masochism. He is no rival with Wolverine, because Wolverine is always physically, morally, and spiritually better than him, without question. Virtually the entire X-Men have ignored him, allowed him to near kill himself, and not even Xavier gives a damn about him. To remain on this team makes him, at best, yet-another-generic-statue in Wolverine's shaggy shadow. But as a villain, to take a post-ULTIMATE X-MEN twist on it (since Millar did have Cyclops join the Brotherhood within the first arc), could actually work better. This is all brain-storming, but I am, again, open to innovative ideas so long as they are executed well.

TheVileOne said:
Now obviously, in this new altered timeline you have the whole AoA scenario where Cyclops was "working" for Apocalypse, but in the comics that was all a ruse, but who knows how that will come up. But hey maybe Dread will get his wish and Cyclops will get a blast to crack at Wolverine's plot armor.

The idea of Cyclops joining the bad guys as a deliberate, "mole" type subplot would never been done in this show unless it was Scott going about Wolverine's idea, because only Wolverine could ever come up with any clever idea in this show (and has). If Cyclops joins Apocalypse and it isn't Logan's idea, there is no way possible it will not be treated as something legitimate. For a very simple reason; in this show, at least in regards to Logan/Scott arguments, Logan is always correct. Logan barks about Scott being unfit for Jean, and he's right. He barks about Scott being distracted and weak-willed, and he's right. He barks at Scott for being dead weight in a fight, and when he says that, he usually is right. There has been no situation in the show thus far where Logan has been wrong and Scott wasn't. Even with Emma Frost, Logan had to hear to "trust" her from his own future version of himself, so even across time, Logan is right in the end. With this pattern in mind, if Cyclops joined with Apocalypse in Season 2, he has to be outright wrong. He has to be the one doing something selfish or single-motivated because Wolverine is the selfless embodiment of all that is X-Men, as Season One showed. The only time he does anything bad that has any ramifications, he is being mind-controlled by someone else, which doesn't count (because at any moment any character could be mind-controlled).

Plus, from what I know of Craig from interviews/commentaries/teasers, he is the sort of fanboy who loves to re-create or fulfill at least some things that fans always debate. Across all of X-Men lore a Wolverine vs. Cyclops thing in terms of fighting has been drudged up a lot. It has never been done as a fight in the movies or any cartoon and I would be surprised if it never happened in any season of WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN, which in some ways acts as wish fulfillment for some things, such as Wolverine vs. Hulk or the Silver Samurai stuff. What better way to have a really cool Logan vs. Scott fight, regardless of who wins, by having Scott join Apocalypse? Again, no matter how the fight ends, Logan HAS to be in the moral right; there is no way that would be allowed unless Scott was an outright bad guy, or was seen as one, or was wrong morally in whatever caused the battle.

Of course, I assumed Craig would jump at the chance to be the first producer of an X-Men show to animate the bonafide Fastball Special, but instead Brett Ratner still is the king of doing that in another media.

TheVileOne said:
Its sort of out there because the season ends with Cyclops in a much better, more positive place. He got his piss and his girlfriend back, but there's still that lingering anguish over Emma. And maybe there's a conflict there if Emma comes back and is suddenly back in the picture again so suddenly Scott is dealing with both Jean and Emma like in Morrison's New X-men run.

I disagree, and sometimes I wonder how we watch the same cartoon. Cyclops is no better than he was in the pilot. He starts the series morbidly obsessed with Jean and ends it morbidly obsessed with Jean. He did nothing to redeem himself or any of his actions in the series; at the start he is willing to abandon his allies to whatever fate beholds them for his own desires, and he does that at the very end of the series (ditching them all to be arrested by the MRD because Frost dangles Jean at him like a carrot). Frost does all the work of saving Jean for him; he's barely her side-kick. And with Jean back, Scott doesn't have to redeem himself, because being a sad sack no-hoper paid off. He did nothing to display why Xavier was wrong in betting on Wolverine to save the team at every juncture. He never was efficient when it really, REALLY counted. About all he was reliable for was blasting Mr. Sinister's minions around twice a season, which I suppose is something. He was a man at the mercy of every emotion at the start of the season, and was the same at the end.

I'm a odd sort of fan; I've grown to like Cyclops over the last 8-9 years, but I've never liked Jean, or the shipping between them. Jean is rarely very interesting and frankly hasn't recovered from being "token female" in the original line up; the Phoenix just distracts from that; it's a cosmic temper tantrum and nothing more functionally. I've probably liked Cyclops with virtually any other woman other than Jean, even bloody Colleen Wing for like two issues. Nothing WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN has done so far has made Jean work; she's as much of a character as Princess Toadstool. We can only experience their relationship through Scott and it's as dysfunctional than Pym & Janet, with the average audience member wondering what Jean could possibly see in him. Women may like men who care enough to miss them, but not to the point where they abandon all their friends and commit suicide without them. Unless they're gothic lolitas, which Jean isn't.

Season One W&TXM sought to create a different sort of show for better or ill, than other X-Men shows. To that end they decided their way to handle Cyclops was to reverse all of the "trends" with him. Often he comes off as stiff and emotionless; here they made him an emotionally crippled introvert, to the point where he only attached to one person in his entire life and then wasted away without her. Often Cyclops is overly competent with the team from the start; here he is arguably the least useful X-Man besides Forge, always bogging down the team with his own petty baggage, and has been since he joined. Often Cyclops was a "token leader" in terms of morality, doing what was "good for the mission" or so on. Here, Cyclops only does for himself, and the mission and the X-Men can be damned. Often Cyclops can be a jerk; in this they dialed that up by a factor of eleven and a half million. He hits Logan in the back for any reason. He provokes fights for his own desires that the X-Men have to always bail him out of. He acts like so much of a tin pot spoiled brat that the average audience member doesn't feel it is too cruel for Future Xavier to tactically and emotionally shun him. Often Scott is attached to Jean; here that is also dialed up by a factor of eleven and a half million. Someone can blow themselves up in front of him as a sacrifice, and that barely gets a glance because Jean is there. Someone can mention Jean, and the rest of the X-Men can go pork themselves with the Sentinels. Frost can practically throw herself at him in every network censored way, and Scott just nags her about finding his dead girlfriend. Scott can't even handle Jean TALKING to another man without his permission. He is the cartoon version of a guy who has a date with a girl once and then forever sends her 444 nude texts every day, until it ends with a restraining order, a Stockholm syndrome marriage, or bloodshed.

Granted, you could say all this has been "different" for Cyclops. In EVOLUTION, the same creative team made him "different" by giving him a sense of humor and a social life, but this is 2008, damn it. That won't why anymore. In my estimation, all of the above twists to this version of Cyclops have worked poorly to make him a hero, and as executed made him unsympathetic, the embodiment of what those who hate him say he is, a block of his worst traits magnified a thousandfold. There is a chance that may change in Season 2, although I don't see any easy outs. If Cyclops pines for Frost after all his obsessive pathological melodrama in Season One for Jean, he will seem like the worst of cads. They've written themselves into a corner here, and the only way out may be to do something more unique, but be able to pull it off. I certainly think it is possible.

Cyclops as Apocalypse and Mr. Sinister's ally as a "ruse" is far too nuanced for the show's simplistic "rivalry" between Logan and him. But going that extra mile and making him a villain could work. He shares all of traits of many sympathetic villains; handled well it could be akin to something we all talk about later; "I never thought it would work, but man, they made it work!" And hey, in the end he still would get to lose and be proven wrong, but it might work as a character journey better for him. I'm just saying that I hope the writing quality improves in Season 2, the execution gets consistent, and if that means thinking a little beyond expectations, so be it.
 
Last edited:
I know this isn't much of a contribution to the thread, but I'm getting the feeling that VileOne either dislikes Cyclops or is just indifferent enough towards Cyclops to not really care what the show's writers do to him. Please correct me if that assumption is wrong.
 
I honestly forgot if Vile mentioned whether he liked or disliked Cyclops at general. Basically to keep things simple, he REALLY likes WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN and feels some of us critics of the show are being too hard on it. He claims he admits the show had faults it could improve upon, but ask him to name one and you get a lot of trite stuff. Of course, it's all subjective.

I actually don't enjoy ripping into the work of the production crew who brought us EVOLUTION and other animated projects. I did expect it to be better even with the premise of Wolverine focus. All I can hope is that Season 2 gets the writing aspects better, because the writing was Season 1's Achilles Heel, the only think keeping it from greatness, from being in the league of SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN. Well, that and a decent action storyboarder.
 

I agree with most of these points. Cyclops really comes off as a real piece of work if you only look at how he is characterized in the show.

However, I think the writers simply take a lot of background from the comics for granted, and assumes the viewer will do so as well. Maybe not the best possible choice, but they probably had to cut out something to have room for all of Wolverine's solo episodes. :csad:
 
Dread, learn to understand that I don't believe the show is as deeply, gravely flawed and meandering off the path as you.

At the end of the season. I have a lot of concerns and questions. But ultimately my feeling is we have a long running serialized X-men show that's giving us a lot of characters, good animation, good voicework, some very mature for its timeslot storytelling, so in this day and age where Cartoon Network is showing garbage reality TV, I'm overjoyed this show came on and came a success. I highly admire and respect the people that work on these shows who really put a lot of thought and work into their characters and into the storytelling.

And if we have this show and soon Avengers, as well as the continuation of Spectacular, it feels like a new golden age of Marvel Cartoons to me. That's more important than all the other kvetching.

Ultimately at the end of the day, I think Justice League as a work despite all my problems with it was extremely important for us to have. After Superman ended it was the only logical step and what fans clamored for years. And we got it. Despite all my problems with it, it did a lot of good and accomplished a lot.
 
I agree with most of these points. Cyclops really comes off as a real piece of work if you only look at how he is characterized in the show.

However, I think the writers simply take a lot of background from the comics for granted, and assumes the viewer will do so as well. Maybe not the best possible choice, but they probably had to cut out something to have room for all of Wolverine's solo episodes. :csad:

For me that was part of the problem of Season One. It sacrificed the fundamentals to dive into their storyline, yet their storyline suffered because those fundamentals weren't covered. The problem with assuming knowledge of the audience is that this cartoon, like other comic shows like it, doesn't just stick to "one" universally accepted continuity. It takes and is faithful to whatever chunks of absorbed continuity from X-Products that it feels work best for it. Many bits are lifted from the comics, but others from the films, or prior cartoons, or the Ultimate comics that are another animal than the "mainstream" stuff. It expects us to care about the X-Men dissolving when we don't even know who these X-Men are. It expected us to notice such a dramatic shift in Cyclops' character when we never SAW what kind of character he was beforehand, and what little we did see really wasn't different from what he was now. It expects the audience to know more about Iceman and Storm, because the show itself does virtually nothing with either; Storm's romance with Angel was lifted from Ultimate X-Men, not the mainstream comics, thus, so much for "assuming it is the same as the comics" as an excuse for cutting story corners.

Cutting corners with character development and fleshing over the entire series for many of them was one of the biggest faults. The trick of serial storytelling is you don't need to devote one or even three ENTIRE episodes to a single character if you flesh a reasonable amount of them every episode, steadily and consistently. This season was far from consistent. For every brilliant episode you got 2-3 that were mundane. By the time the finale happened I realized that despite all the pretty explosions or Sentinel battles, I knew so little about many of the characters involved that I hardly cared about the outcome and it was just a firework display, a lot of sparkle that fades quickly and means little. The one character I felt was fleshed the best and actually was sympathetic besides the titular Wolverine blew up. I still feel that it was perhaps a misstep to give the audience a sympathetic death yet dooming them to a boring relationship in the process in Season Two.

Some viewers are happy enough with the show not being complete rubbish. I am not. I expect better than "mildly above average" from the creative team we got.

Dread, learn to understand that I don't believe the show is as deeply, gravely flawed and meandering off the path as you.

Considering the talent involved, I found it underwhelming. That is probably the best way to put it.

TheVileOne said:
At the end of the season. I have a lot of concerns and questions. But ultimately my feeling is we have a long running serialized X-men show that's giving us a lot of characters, good animation, good voicework, some very mature for its timeslot storytelling, so in this day and age where Cartoon Network is showing garbage reality TV, I'm overjoyed this show came on and came a success. I highly admire and respect the people that work on these shows who really put a lot of thought and work into their characters and into the storytelling.

And if we have this show and soon Avengers, as well as the continuation of Spectacular, it feels like a new golden age of Marvel Cartoons to me. That's more important than all the other kvetching.

Cartoon Network I think will be running that MARVEL SUPER HERO SQUAD show, which I know is way below my age range and thus won't bother with.

Your deal is that you're pleased the show didn't suck completely, and that Marvel is putting out more cartoons, so you don't fret as much about "details". Right?

To be fair, this isn't a rare opinion. I remember reading one comment from someone at a blog talking about the show that went something like, "For a show imitating storylines and hairstyles from the 1990's, it [WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN] is...surprisingly not s***." And if that is your bar, then it's all gravy. I also read some comments on IMDB that were akin to, "Cyclops may be a dick, but at least he's not boring." So I do understand this opinion. I just disagree, personally.

I admire and respect the people working on this show. I am well aware of the classic stuff they can make collectively (or even individually) when they are on, shooting from all angles. That was why I was so startled that the writing on WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN would be the way it is. Characters traded for spectacles, and a lot of holes in some areas. Some say it is typical of a first season to work out kinks, but most first seasons of cartoons are 13 episodes, not 26.

But even I acknowledge the show as "above average" (even if by a hair), helped greatly by the voice cast and animation quality. It just depends on whether that is enough for a fan considering the history of the prior X-Men cartoons, even the one that this creative team worked on.

The bar for AVENGERS: EARTH'S MIGHTIEST HEROES is much lower than for X-MEN because the last Avengers cartoon from 1999 was so hideously bad. All Yost & Neili have to do is not suck there, and it will be fine. Maybe it isn't fair that the last two X-Men cartoons weren't abysmal garbage and so the bar for this show could be lower than it is, but that's reality.

TheVileOne said:
Ultimately at the end of the day, I think Justice League as a work despite all my problems with it was extremely important for us to have. After Superman ended it was the only logical step and what fans clamored for years. And we got it. Despite all my problems with it, it did a lot of good and accomplished a lot.

We're...talking about JUSTICE LEAGUE now? I guess it is disclosure since you've said a few times that JUSTICE LEAGUE/JLU was "overrated" elsewhere.

I believe Marvel has the potential to be able to top some of the stuff accomplished with JLU. The question is whether they have the cajones to do so, to push that envelope and to insist on quality in every angle, not just settling for getting 3 out of 4 fine. That wasn't WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN this season, which often settled for "good enough" in terms of some character bits or storytelling elements, taking shortcuts for the sake of "the audience must know" at every turn, while changing what the audience should "know" on a whim if it serves the story.

To be fair, only HULK VS. (made by many of the same people as W&TXM) pushed that envelope in quality out of the Lion's Gate DTV's so far. So it isn't that I don't think Kyle, Johnson, Yost & Co. aren't capable of greatness, or haven't achieved it in the recent past; it is that I sometimes am dismayed that they aren't consistent at it. They haven't collectively racked up the win streak of a PIXAR or a Greg Wiesman. At least not yet.
 
Last edited:
Your deal is that you're pleased the show didn't suck completely, and that Marvel is putting out more cartoons, so you don't fret as much about "details". Right?

The details you dislike about the show I either like or don't have a problem with. I don't hate Wolverine like you do. Wolverine is one of my favorite characters. I generally disagree with most of your points about Cyclops and the story in general. I don't care to go into a big comparison on it right now.

We're...talking about JUSTICE LEAGUE now? I guess it is disclosure since you've said a few times that JUSTICE LEAGUE/JLU was "overrated" elsewhere.

That's because it was overrated. Much like 1990's X-men still is. Craig Kyle for example admittedly hates the 90's X-men series but has also said that without the show Marvel Studios as it is now would not exist.

To be fair, only HULK VS. (made by many of the same people as W&TXM) pushed that envelope in quality out of the Lion's Gate DTV's so far. So it isn't that I don't think Kyle, Johnson, Yost & Co. aren't capable of greatness, or haven't achieved it in the recent past; it is that I sometimes am dismayed that they aren't consistent at it. They haven't collectively racked up the win streak of a PIXAR or a Greg Wiesman. At least not yet.

Hulk VS. was a single 35 minute OVA. X-men is a 26 episode first season show where they aren't the only writers.

Not every episode of BTAS or TNBA was the beez kneez.
 
The details you dislike about the show I either like or don't have a problem with. I don't hate Wolverine like you do. Wolverine is one of my favorite characters. I generally disagree with most of your points about Cyclops and the story in general. I don't care to go into a big comparison on it right now.

Very well. Taste is subjective.

For the record, I didn't always "hate" Wolverine, nor do I always hate him. For example, I thought Wolverine was great all around in HULK VS. WOLVERINE from start to finish. I was a hardcore fan of the character until well into college.

I simply begun to "hate" Wolverine when entire generations of writers or editorial departments were turning him into things he wasn't. Wolverine was cool because of his flaws; for the sake of popularity, said flaws are understated, ignored, or no longer have consequences. When Wolverine started to take character bits or details or dynamics from other X-Men and absorb them into himself like a greedy amoeba, I started to hate that. Whether that meant a close emotional connection to Mystique (absorbed from Rogue and Nightcrawler) to being Xavier's Favorite Son (absorbed from Cyclops) to being the natural leader to turn to in a crisis (absorbed from Storm), and so on. For such a great character, I became amazed at how much of a glutton Wolvie became at devouring other character's focal points. The comics were drowning in this by the late 90's, the movies magnified it, and this cartoon chose to emulate it. Above all, when Wolverine became the be and end all of the X-Men, and when editors and directors and writers would all but tell the audience the X-Men as a concept are worthless without him. That sort of thing started to turn me off in ways.

There is a quote that I always pull from some random poster at the old WIZARDWORLD forums in 2000-2001 that describes my feelings about Logan to a T, and it is a damn shame I can't recall and credit his handle: "I used to love Wolverine; he was such a great character. Then he became popular, and it ruined him."

TheVileOne said:
That's because it was overrated. Much like 1990's X-men still is. Craig Kyle for example admittedly hates the 90's X-men series but has also said that without the show Marvel Studios as it is now would not exist.

Kyle hates the 90's show? I'd not heard that one.

I'll admit that the original X-Men cartoon was very much a product of it's time (where many of the flaws come from), but it was also a trend setter, fondly remembered over 11 years later. Buena Vista can spend no more on putting it on DVD than a bootlegger at a convention burning from JETIX broadcasts and get it to sell some 250,000 copies. And for all it's time sensitive flaws and panderings, the original X-MEN still managed to handle their characters very well. While Wolverine appeared the most out of them in the end, I never got the impression that he was deliberately more important than the rest, at least not until maybe the middle of Season 4 at points. He still shared the screen most frequently with Rogue, Beast, Xavier, or Cyclops. Probably the only character who wasn't fleshed that well from the main cast was Gambit, who was still a very new character in the comics. Even guest stars like Colossus or Nightcrawler who only had two episodes were fleshed very well in each.

The series finale can still get me to almost choke up sometimes. Xavier basically telling all of his X-Men farewell before he dies, in a way each one of them appreciated. That's the sort of heart that was missing in WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN. When members went missing or were brainwashed, none of the X-Men cared, treating them as typical opponents. When any were in turmoil, they were quickly emotionally abandoned. The only one Xavier gave a damn about was Wolverine.

If Kyle really does hate the 90's X-Men, it is a shame. He could stand to learn from it and improve upon it, rather than scorning it.

TheVileOne said:
Hulk VS. was a single 35 minute OVA. X-men is a 26 episode first season show where they aren't the only writers.

Not every episode of BTAS or TNBA was the beez kneez.

HULK VS. WOLVERINE was 35 minutes. HULK VS. THOR was 45 minutes. I was counting the entire package, called HULK VS.

No, not every episode of Bruce Timm's Batman show was a masterpiece. You also have to keep in mind the sheer amount of episodes. Not counting movies, DTV's, or BATMAN BEYOND (or JL/U), there were approximately 103 episodes, including a few crossovers/team-up's with Superman's show. With over 100 episodes under your belt, you are going to acquire a batting average like anyone else. If even 85% of your show is excellent, you still are going to easily find 15-20 episodes that are mundane ("MAKE 'EM LAUGH") or just terrible ("CRITTERS").

Are you asserting that WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN is going to have so many episodes that we should just chalk up all the faults of Season One, the only season yet aired, as a mere statistical blip or slump?

Frankly, once WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN has some episodes at least half as good as B:TAS' best (like "I AM THE NIGHT"), maybe I will cut it some slack. Not before.
 
Kyle hates the 90's show? I'd not heard that one.

Let me rephrase that. Kyle is simply "not a fan of the show." This is taken from my interview with Kyle and Chris Yost at last year's SDCC:

CK: And again, I'm very proud of it. Being a true fan, I wanted to show the X-men the way they should be, and that's what this new series is going to be. But what it is, how do we separate ourselves from such a loved and cherished '90's series which I must tell you, not a fan of. The animation was too clunky, the voices were unbearable. The comics were put through the shredder and that's what became the series which again, I'm grateful for because of what it brought us. We wouldn't be sitting here today if that hadn't happened in so many ways. But I wanted to bring us back all those great stories, speak to the things Joss Whedon has done, Grant Morrison has done, early [Chris] Claremont, and all the greats that we know from the '80's and before. And by taking out Xavier, and Jean, and forcing the guy who should never lead the team to be the leader you can now do those stories in a way that makes them completely different. The boyscout [Cyclops] has lost his father and his girlfriend and has no reason to fight. You put in Emma Frost who is definitely not Jean Grey, and you get a whole group of characters in situations that feel unique to themselves, even though we may be doing some of the classic stories that will work very well from the fan standpoint of the '90's series. So it was a way to go back and make it fresh . . . When I look back at it as a saga, it feels much more like an adult, on-going series because we didn't have to worry about one-offs, and it is so continuity heavy that you need to come in and stay for the ride.

I actually spoke quite a bit with Kyle and Yost about Wolverine and The X-men, but this was before I knew much of what I know now having seen all of the first season. It was also before I got to see the pilot the following day at Con.

I'll admit that the original X-Men cartoon was very much a product of it's time (where many of the flaws come from), but it was also a trend setter, fondly remembered over 11 years later. Buena Vista can spend no more on putting it on DVD than a bootlegger at a convention burning from JETIX broadcasts and get it to sell some 250,000 copies. And for all it's time sensitive flaws and panderings, the original X-MEN still managed to handle their characters very well. While Wolverine appeared the most out of them in the end, I never got the impression that he was deliberately more important than the rest, at least not until maybe the middle of Season 4 at points. He still shared the screen most frequently with Rogue, Beast, Xavier, or Cyclops. Probably the only character who wasn't fleshed that well from the main cast was Gambit, who was still a very new character in the comics. Even guest stars like Colossus or Nightcrawler who only had two episodes were fleshed very well in each.

Dude you don't have to convince me of this Dread. I love the 1990's show and for all it did. But for all the love it has, people seem to ignore how dated it is. When I was watching it at the time though as an elementary schooler, it was probably the greatest show I had ever seen.

If Kyle really does hate the 90's X-Men, it is a shame. He could stand to learn from it and improve upon it, rather than scorning it.

I shouldn't have said he hated it. Rather he's not a fan of it.

HULK VS. WOLVERINE was 35 minutes. HULK VS. THOR was 45 minutes. I was counting the entire package, called HULK VS.

OK so its about 78 minutes which is less than 4 episodes for the typical TV show.

No, not every episode of Bruce Timm's Batman show was a masterpiece. You also have to keep in mind the sheer amount of episodes. Not counting movies, DTV's, or BATMAN BEYOND (or JL/U), there were approximately 103 episodes, including a few crossovers/team-up's with Superman's show. With over 100 episodes under your belt, you are going to acquire a batting average like anyone else. If even 85% of your show is excellent, you still are going to easily find 15-20 episodes that are mundane ("MAKE 'EM LAUGH") or just terrible ("CRITTERS").

After the second season we will have 52 episodes of the new X-men show, Just keep that in mind.

Are you asserting that WOLVERINE AND THE X-MEN is going to have so many episodes that we should just chalk up all the faults of Season One, the only season yet aired, as a mere statistical blip or slump?

Your faults are not my faults. The issues and concerns I do have I hope will be worked out. Colossus for example. I am just as annoyed as you by the lack of Colossus in the show. However, if they figure out a great creative way to work him back in, then hopefully it will make sense. If not, I will continue to be annoyed by the lack of Colossus. I also see that with everything else going on it might've been too much to bring Colossus back.

MYP He-Man had some issues, but overall it was a pretty fantastic show and did some amazing things with the material. And it got canned when things were getting even better. It was a ****ing tragedy.
 
MYP He-Man had some issues, but overall it was a pretty fantastic show and did some amazing things with the material. And it got canned when things were getting even better. It was a ****ing tragedy.
I will definitely agree with you there Vile. I too mourn the premature death of the MYP He-Man. Of course, I'm still mourning the premature canceling of Exo-Squad from the 1990s.
 
Let me rephrase that. Kyle is simply "not a fan of the show." This is taken from my interview with Kyle and Chris Yost at last year's SDCC:

I stand (or sit) clarified. While Kyle has a point about the animation, I thought the voice cast was pretty good; the problem was that much of their dialogue was dated. Watching the series now, everyone aside for Beast, Cyclops, or Xavier on the main cast always has some painfully bad lines now and then; Storm being the poster child for the worst. Still, that was common for shows in the 90's. Which is why I say that it was a product of it's time in many ways. Expecting a series that ended 11 years ago to hold up 100% to what is the standard now is futile. Every show has some time centric tics.

Every time I read or hear Kyle talk about the show, I always think that I would have loved to have watched the show in his head, which is so much more layered and dramatic than the show he and the rest have produced, animated, and aired. In his show, Wolverine being the leader really didn't change a whole lot about the team dynamic; everyone followed him to the letter, his mistakes didn't matter, and it all worked out. The only one effected was Cyclops, but as episode 20 noted, he was never a leader to begin with. He had nothing to fight for when the show started and he never rose above that at the end; he was a mess because he didn't have Xavier or Jean, and he doesn't rise above that; he just is handed Jean back (all but literally). Maybe something got deluted between the production process and the episodes as they were made, and whatever it is, hopefully more of it comes in with Season 2.

TheVileOne said:
Dude you don't have to convince me of this Dread. I love the 1990's show and for all it did. But for all the love it has, people seem to ignore how dated it is. When I was watching it at the time though as an elementary schooler, it was probably the greatest show I had ever seen.

I rewatched the series a few months ago and I am aware of the faults. I still say it holds up better than many shows from the 90's do. There are still great moments and things to take away from it, to learn from it, to see what it accomplished DESPITE a low animation budget and a Marvel that was bleeding money (FoxKids had to fund the final 6 episodes).

TheVileOne said:
OK so its about 78 minutes which is less than 4 episodes for the typical TV show.

78 minutes of something exceptional trumps 26 episodes that failed to reach that bar for me. The task for Season 2 for the writers will be to rise to that level, especially as they have been given more episodes to do so than many shows.

TheVileOne said:
After the second season we will have 52 episodes of the new X-men show, Just keep that in mind.

So I cannot criticize the show until Season 2 is in the can? And what if Season 2 hasn't improved on the faults? Will the story be, "Well, Season 3 is approved, that'll be 78 episodes, the most for a Marvel show ever, so give it time"? Please. SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN helped remind me that expecting a show to be great at episode 1, and to continue being great until episode 26, is not being harsh or unfair, because some shows actually rise to that occasion.

TheVileOne said:
Your faults are not my faults. The issues and concerns I do have I hope will be worked out. Colossus for example. I am just as annoyed as you by the lack of Colossus in the show. However, if they figure out a great creative way to work him back in, then hopefully it will make sense. If not, I will continue to be annoyed by the lack of Colossus. I also see that with everything else going on it might've been too much to bring Colossus back.

Yet every time I complain about the lack of Colossus, or the absurdity of promoting his image in so many ads and teasers for the show given how little he does in Season One, or even in the pilot episode where he shows up for the first and last time, you usually poo poo it. No, what you and I consider faults are different. I complain more about fundamental problems, and I think you are thinking far too far in the future of a glorious Marvel age of animation in the 21st century that is up that you are missing that some of the X-Men stuff ain't so hot.

I will say that the show's in a bit of a corner on Colossus. It would be very hard, at the least, to paint him as a big deal after making him a non-entity in the first season. Which, ironically, is a shame because he, Kurt, Logan and Kitty always got along in the comics, where kind of like a unit.

TheVileOne said:
MYP He-Man had some issues, but overall it was a pretty fantastic show and did some amazing things with the material. And it got canned when things were getting even better. It was a ****ing tragedy.

You mean the 2002 era HE-MAN cartoon? Admittedly I saw very little of it. I saw the 3 part pilot and recalled liking the animation and some of the fighting, but not being especially excited about it. Granted, I was 21 then and my tastes were a little different. I probably like TMNT more than HE-MAN. That said, I had debated giving the series a try once it was collected onto decent DVD volumes. I hear it is being re-released by SHOUT! Factory.
 
Some viewers are happy enough with the show not being complete rubbish. I am not. I expect better than "mildly above average" from the creative team we got.


welldone30f.gif
 
Is it just me or do we really need some news on the new season??
 
Animation takes a while to complete; writing an episode can take a few weeks but it can sometimes take 16-20 months, give or take, for finished animation to come back overseas. I suspect we may not see a trailer for Season 2 until around the Fall or Winter of this year, at the earliest. Plus, remember, episodes will likely air 4-8 months earlier in Canada or overseas. Hell, it could be argued that strong international demand helped ensure the show getting renewed.

I'm not surprised at the lack of concrete info yet. It could also be that they are waiting for the season finale to air on NickToons before getting specific about Season 2.
 
I don't think we will hear much until the first season finishes in the US which could be a while.
 
There just a few small things I'd like to see in season 2, I'd like more colossus, if gambit joins the team I want a new outfit for him, and maybe lengthen his hair just a little.

Also I was watching the show on nicktoons network the other. Night and they said they'd have summer sneak peeks, and in the commercial there is a shot of wolverine jumping into the air and he is wearing his first appearance yellow/blue costume. I don't remember seeing that in season 1 so maybe it was shot from the second season.
 
Gamma Goliath. There's actually footage of Wolverine in that costume in the 7th episode with Hulk as the guest star. Hulk has a flashback with Wolverine in that costume.

Btw everyone, I now have audio footage of Kari Wahlgren in Emma Frost's voice saying, "I am very cross."
 
Btw everyone, I now have audio footage of Kari Wahlgren in Emma Frost's voice saying, "I am very cross."

Was that from an episode in season one, or are you hinting she will be back for the second season?
 
TheVileOne supposedly occasionally does interviews with the W&TXM crew I think. He's their staunchest defender.

Honestly, from what Kyle said in his HULK VS. THOR commentary, he likes "dark chicks" and he likes Kari's performances. I would have been beyond stunned if we went a whole 26 episodes without Frost returning in Season 2, considering being shattered failed to kill her in the comics. It was during Morrison's "New" X-Men run, and Jean used the Phoenix force to fuse Frost back together.

My thing is that after all the pining for Jean in Season 1, the triangle is in a bit of a corner since if Scott just automatically pines for Frost now, he'll seem like a cad to Jean. There's no good way out of the situation. Frost is WAY more interesting, but the bit of Scott being a loser/chump/cad is getting mighty old. It's no fun having a rival for Wolverine, in theory, be such a non-factor. He's no competition for the ultimate X-Man. It may have been much easier to just have axed Jean in Season 1 (since she never dies anyway) and had Season 2 start with Frost and Scott actually together. While I understand going for the more impactful sacrifice in Season 1, since there was no assurance they would be renewed during production, that leaves the situation in a bit of a mess in Season 2.

The Achilles Heel of Season 1 was the writing. The animation and acting were superb, and yeah, some of the action scene storyboarding was mediocre at times, but that can all be gravy if the writing is top caliber. At the very least, I hope Season 2 does a better job of transferring the passionate ideas of the production crew into the episodes themselves. I mean I never doubt the passion of Kyle, Johnson, et al for these things. But in Season 1 it seemed as if something was lost in the translation. Kyle would do these preview interviews and he'd describe a much better, more interesting and nuanced show than what was actually animated and aired to millions. Given that they're involved at the center of production, their relation to the material will be different from outsider viewers like us. Season 2 has to pick it up. There's no excuse. Very few cartoons were as lucky to score 26 episodes a season right off the bat lately. I can eventually forgive a B grade quality Season 1 if the next season kicks things up to about a B+ or an A-. Many shows had to find their feet in a first season so it is possible.
 
Last edited:
i cant wait for season 2!

since we all dont want the "x-men from past trying to prevent the bad future plot" as a main feature,i hope it will only show that in a few eps.i think they will center it in the future,like they did with mastermold and marrow and stuff in season 1,as the main plot.i have a theroie,i think that at the end of season 2 future forge and bishop will make a time traveling device and bring the future x-men back in time and prevent apocalypse from taking over the world.i kinda also want bishop and forge to make a machine that will take prof x out of the coma,so everything will be back to normal

that is just a theroie though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,346
Messages
22,088,567
Members
45,887
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"