Saint
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 13,591
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
Need to ask Saint about that, he had a perfect explanation but I've forgotten what it is.
It may be this one:
Saint said:As I always say, Batman comes from three schools: monster, soldier, and superhero. Some will say "He's not a superhero," but those individuals are kidding themselves. Certainly true of individual stories, but we have to consider the entirety of his history. He is one part superhero, plain and simple.
Anyways, the suit is designed accordingly. It communicates differently to different people, as is it's purpose. He cannot look strictly like a demon bat-thing, because that would make effective relations with police, witnesses, and civilians considerably more difficult, if not impossible. Cops would do nothing but shoot at him, and witnesses and civilians would run in terror. Yes, they do this sometimes anyway, but those instances are decidedly reduced because the batsuit makes him recognizable as a human being upon closer inspection.
For the cops, this means they know he's a man--superpowers or not--and can thus be reasoned with. He falls into a pattern they understand, and as such they fall into a pattern Batman understands. It makes dealing with them, whether they are acting as allies or enemies, that much easier than if they ran away from him in terror, or shot mindlessly at him. Why else wouldn't he disguise his gear (the soldier element)? Cops see the gear, and they can relate. That's an easy win.
As for the public, well, they recognize superhero conventions. The symbol on his chest means he is one, but to do that it has to be seen. Black on black isn't so good for that. If he's a superhero--with a symbol on his chest and a human face to look at--civilians and witnesses will be naturally more inclined to cooperate with him, than if he was a snarling bat demon. You could explain the boots/gloves/briefs convention the same way, if you really wanted to. That brings me back to my original point: you can rationalize anything. You could come up with fine arguments for a black costume, too, but they're not legitimate, for reasons I have explained. The grey arguments aren't legitimate, either. They don't need to be. It's like I said: why can't people just admit they just prefer X or Y, and cut the crap?