Have just finished reading the Bible! yeehoo! Will certanly have to read certain sections again before the exam but it should be easier now that I know the gist of all the books there.
(note: this is a review purely from a literal story pov. i'm not bashing any religious stuff)
I must say first and foremost that OT is much much better than NT. I especially like when God goes around doing stuff and tells people to do things, and without any reasons too, like a BAWS
One thing that bothered me a bit is why fish never is mentioned before the flood destroys everything. It's only after the water has settled that fish are even mentioned. I dont know, does not seem entirely logical that the fish would not exist before. Another strange continuity thing here is that God divided the water from one mass to two. This doesnt make any sense since rain is freshwater and the sea is salt-water. I guess it could be explained that he separated the two types that existed in the one... ball... of water in the beginning.
Then another thing, that applies to both the OT and NT, are that all ordinary people are really whipped and naïve. No one ever questions neither God nor Jesus on what they do or say. If they are supposed to be the main characters, give us readers at least one reason for wanting to care for them. Perfect characters without any arc becomes very boring to read about in the long run. And if the point of these books are that we should learn something from the characters, then let us know the characters! Let us get under their skin and learn that way instead, give them at least some depth. As it stands now, both God and Jesus are as characters no deeper than cardboard cut-outs.
Gospel of Mark is probably the best in the NT, but not because it is good and exciting, but only because all other books are so incredibly miserable and boring. Especially what Paul writes, he should just stop. Seriously you have to be a pure sadist if you think that for example Romans and the Apostle creeds are entertaining reads.
Unlike from the other Gospels, Mark is short, concise and to the point. Unnecessary fluff are not noticeable (good riddance) here (unlike yours, Paul!) which raises the score a lot. I also need to bring up the giant plot hole in the ending of the Gospels, Judas is a completely superfluous character if you think about it. The romans already know where Jesus has his gatherings, and he has already blasphemed straight to a jewish priest face when he tells him the golden rule. So why did they not take care of him right then and there?
So if the Bible had only been OT + Mark + Revelation, it had gotten a much higher rating, now unfortunately it is stuck with a lot of fuzzy unnecessary bulls**t that I advise people to skip completely (especially everyhting Paul writes, master of the BOOOOOORE

!)
6/10 Better than I thought, but still full of problems and plot holes.