Which disturbs you more?

What disturbs you more? The abuse of....

  • People

  • Animals


Results are only viewable after voting.
Both are equally disturbing.

Why is this even a poll? :confused:
 
Calendar Man said:
What gets under your skin more? The abuse of people or the abuse of animals (like dogs etc.)?

It depends on the circumstance of the torture. Any torturing done for no other reason than to cause pain and anguish in another, human or animal, is disturbing. Torture for coercion, punishment or research is more abhorrent than disturbing.
 
Both are terrible but I think it's worse on animals
 
This is a weird poll. Torture towards any living creature is horrible and cruel and totally not right. Both are equally disturbing. Abuse/Torture of animals usually leads to abuse/torture of human beings.

For those who seem to applaud torture of human beings, I wonder... is that only limited to hardcore criminals or humans in general?
 
Calendar Man said:
Dogs are better people then people.
I love animals, especially dogs... but I think that statement is huge generalizatoin.
 
definitely people, i'm not an animal person although i could possibly see why some people may find animal abuse more disturbing
 
Abuse of people. My vote at this point just tipped the scale in favour of people to. Cool.
 
Odin's Lapdog said:
definitely people, i'm not an animal person although i could possibly see why some people may find animal abuse more disturbing
I LOVE animals and would probably own a zoo full of adopted animals if I have the land and other resources.... but anyway, I just don't get how can the abuse of a human, example a child, an old man, a helpless woman or an innocent man, be less disturbing than the abuse of a helpless animal? I think both should be equally disturbing. Anyone who can inflict torture on a human is no better than those who inflict torture on an animal.
 
Neither should be tortured, but I voted Animals to even out the votes.
 
I'm not voting unless another option is included; BOTH.
 
Peter is against both also.........

whooa9yc.gif
 
Animals. Beating a dog, especially a puppy, is horrible. Anyone who does it should have their testicles tied to a train.
 
Spidey-Bat said:
Animals. Beating a dog, especially a puppy, is horrible. Anyone who does it should have their testicles tied to a train.

To a train you say! Is that not then people cruelty?
 
Spidey-Bat said:
Animals. Beating a dog, especially a puppy, is horrible. Anyone who does it should have their testicles tied to a train.

Well, that's all good and well for dogs, but what about the less cute members of the animal kingdom? If there's one thing I hate it's people who will help a cute puppy with a cold before the help a lizard with a tumor. Of course, I'm not saying that you are this type of person, but I just want to voice my distaste for that "if it's not cute then it can't be pitied" mentality.
 
Calendar Man said:
I would have to say animals without a doubt. People suck.

I would tend to agree.Its in human nature to kill and tourture each other,but animals can not defend themselfs for the most part,that`s why i choose animals.
 
Oh, and btw everyone who said "Both" should choose Animals as their vote; humans are animals too.
 
LexCorp said:
To a train you say! Is that not then people cruelty?

No b/c they deserve it for beating an animal.

SuperFerre said:
Well, that's all good and well for dogs, but what about the less cute members of the animal kingdom? If there's one thing I hate it's people who will help a cute puppy with a cold before the help a lizard with a tumor. Of course, I'm not saying that you are this type of person, but I just want to voice my distaste for that "if it's not cute then it can't be pitied" mentality.

I just used the dog as an example. The only animal I wouldn't help is a squirrel. There are too many where I live. And rats. Rats are gross.
 
DBella said:
I LOVE animals and would probably own a zoo full of adopted animals if I have the land and other resources.... but anyway, I just don't get how can the abuse of a human, example a child, an old man, a helpless woman or an innocent man, be less disturbing than the abuse of a helpless animal? I think both should be equally disturbing. Anyone who can inflict torture on a human is no better than those who inflict torture on an animal.
because i don't invest any emotion into animals, i've never had the need to, their just animals in my eyes.

consider this twisted logic...

if you ever came across beastality on the internet, what would your mind go to first

that man is crazy
that woman is being abused

that poor sheep is being molested
that dog is being treated unfairly


the mind (or at least mind) automatically looks at the human victim culprit and just sees the animal as a means to an end in production. Same goes for when jockeys whip horses in horseriding or fox hunting affairs when the foxes get done in or perhaps all the battery hen abuse that goes on and we happily feed off them or perhaps animals in zoos and music videos and all that jazz.

perhaps i'm just desensitised or maybe i've never been sensitive to animals so much to begin with.

either way if i saw a stray dog or a stray baby, i know which number i would be ringing up for assistance first time after time.

but again, i can understand why people who said animals would vote in that manner, just giving light from one perspective.
 
I feel tempted to vote for animals, but I eat animals. "Innocent" ones, just like your loveable pets. So, that is hypocritical...
 
Honey Vibe said:
I feel tempted to vote for animals, but I eat animals. "Innocent" ones, just like your loveable pets. So, that is hypocritical...

That's different. Animals eat other animals, that's nature. Hitting a dachshund in the head with a hammer isn't.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,563
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"