DBella said:
I LOVE animals and would probably own a zoo full of adopted animals if I have the land and other resources.... but anyway, I just don't get how can the abuse of a human, example a child, an old man, a helpless woman or an innocent man, be less disturbing than the abuse of a helpless animal? I think both should be equally disturbing. Anyone who can inflict torture on a human is no better than those who inflict torture on an animal.
because i don't invest any emotion into animals, i've never had the need to, their just
animals in my eyes.
consider this twisted logic...
if you ever came across beastality on the internet, what would your mind go to first
that man is crazy
that woman is being abused
that poor sheep is being molested
that dog is being treated unfairly
the mind (or at least mind) automatically looks at the human victim culprit and just sees the animal as a means to an end in production. Same goes for when jockeys whip horses in horseriding or fox hunting affairs when the foxes get done in or perhaps all the battery hen abuse that goes on and we happily feed off them or perhaps animals in zoos and music videos and all that jazz.
perhaps i'm just desensitised or maybe i've never been sensitive to animals so much to begin with.
either way if i saw a stray dog or a stray baby, i know which number i would be ringing up for assistance first time after time.
but again, i can understand why people who said animals would vote in that manner, just giving light from one perspective.