Elijya
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2003
- Messages
- 38,215
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I think when you're dealing with things empowered by God himself, they go beyond the scope of simply "magic".
If nothing else, it's more than reasonable to assume the effects of the decree would be from the decree's intent and not literal meaning.
For instance "nor would their hammers fall on empty chambers". Nowhere in that sentence does it say that the hammers would actually fall on bullets, it just says the chambers would not be empty. He could pull the trigger one day and the hammer would fall on chambers full of bubble gum. That would fall within the guidelines of the decree, now wouldn't it? That's if the decree is taken literally, which it's not, it's based on the intention of the decree, and the intention of "nor would their hammers fall on empty chambers" is that there would always be bullets in the chambers.
If nothing else, it's more than reasonable to assume the effects of the decree would be from the decree's intent and not literal meaning.
For instance "nor would their hammers fall on empty chambers". Nowhere in that sentence does it say that the hammers would actually fall on bullets, it just says the chambers would not be empty. He could pull the trigger one day and the hammer would fall on chambers full of bubble gum. That would fall within the guidelines of the decree, now wouldn't it? That's if the decree is taken literally, which it's not, it's based on the intention of the decree, and the intention of "nor would their hammers fall on empty chambers" is that there would always be bullets in the chambers.

