Who here besides me thinks this is going to suck?

Idk cause i really liked electro, but that was the only bright point in the show.
Whats up with spidey making all these lame jokes while battling bad guys?
And eddie brock a nerd? and getting along with peter? wtf.
Spiderman:TAS in the 90's wasnt bad at all, it was smart, but this is just weird.
But theres still hope for it.
I wanna see green goblin.
Also i think it was a smart choice to save venom and carnage for the next season.
Have u ever read a spidey comic? and since when has spidey's jokes ever been "Lame" sure he may crake a joke thats a little dry but they are still funny. and if u have watched the 90's series then u should be use to spidey cracking jokes while fighting villains, honestly since when did SHH start getting "Whacked up, whacky, whack-jobs" making dumb statements about how something that actually is cool suposedly sucking?
 
I thought it was going to suck, but I'm glad I was wrong.
 
Have u ever read a spidey comic? and since when has spidey's jokes ever been "Lame" sure he may crake a joke thats a little dry but they are still funny. and if u have watched the 90's series then u should be use to spidey cracking jokes while fighting villains, honestly since when did SHH start getting "Whacked up, whacky, whack-jobs" making dumb statements about how something that actually is cool suposedly sucking?

Because it's aimed at kids, so it must suck. Didn't you know that a rule about comics, anything aimed at kids=automatically bad.
 
Fanboys, you give them quips they complain, you don't give them quips they complain. Now they want want their quips at just the right specific style of funny. :dry:

And this is exactly why the producers have pretty much given fanboys the middle finger and turned montana into shocker.
 
Well we dont know for sure is the whole montana/shocker thing is true. We got to wait to saturday for sure. I really dont see it happening since they said they are fans of the classic era spidey and have been mostly using elements from that peroids for the show to do an identity change. There is no point in doing it. but we dont know for sure right now.
 
And this is exactly why the producers have pretty much given fanboys the middle finger and turned montana into shocker.
Fanboys deserve the middle finger most of the time, so I'm with the producers. And based on the promo, I can't wait to see said episode, even if it is Montana as Shocker. :o
 
Because it's aimed at kids, so it must suck. Didn't you know that a rule about comics, anything aimed at kids=automatically bad.
that is one of the dumbest statements i have ever heard. Also that is completely false.
and if everything aimed at kids is bad then u might as well say that all the things we grew up with as kids were just dumb. stupid, steaming piles of crap. Bassically u are saying that cartoons such as Gargoyles, BatMan, Spider-Man, X-Men, all the cartoons and stuff related to them that we grew up with, is bad.
 
Fanboys deserve the middle finger most of the time, so I'm with the producers. And based on the promo, I can't wait to see said episode, even if it is Montana as Shocker. :o
I'm with you on that.

Nor can I, at least Montana has had some development time. Herman Shultz on the other hand, hasn't. I don't even think he has been introduced. Another smart move on their part.
 
Has doubts been confirmed? Or simply coming out more? It still is possible to make a cartoon fun for kids and older viewers.
 
I'm with you on that.

Nor can I, at least Montana has had some development time. Herman Shultz on the other hand, hasn't. I don't even think he has been introduced. Another smart move on their part.
ya Montana has had at most a whole minute of screentime, it sure would have been tough to introduce Herman with all that character development
 
What's there to develop? He's a merc for hire who loves his job and takes being a man very seriously.
 
well some people think that it wouldn't make sense for Herman to be Shocker because Montana was very developed(for a whole minute)
 
well some people think that it wouldn't make sense for Herman to be Shocker because Montana was very developed(for a whole minute)

It was certainly for more than a minute but introducing a character in every episode that then becomes the villain makes the show's format feel more tired like in Smallville imho. For me it's far more interesting to see Dr. Connors and Flint Marko for a few episodes before their transformation with Alex O'Hirn, Otto Octavius and Norman Osborn to come.

I have a feeling that we will see Shocker again and have the "correct" man behind the mask especially given that the producers generally want to maintain the essence of the original comics.
 
Close the thread. While I hate the designs I like the stories overall. So, moderator please close thread.
 
No, this shall not be closed, this thread shall remain open, now and forever more.
 
i'm just trying to make the point that the character development argument is crap

How about this argument? In terms of their personality and decision making, what's that different from Montana to Herman Schultz? Put Schultz behind the mask and essentially, you have the exact same character, albeit with a different accent. He'll still be a mercenary and he'll still retain his professionalism.
 
Does it really matter to you who Shocker is? You're the only one left who's still *****ing and moaning about it.
no i don't really care(although i think everyone would agree it would have been better if he was the correct charactor), i only posted in the first place because people were using an argument that didn't make anysense, like i already said
 
Christ leave the guy be, I still hate the decision too, but I kinda liked it in the end. Not everyone who watches this has to like EVERY SINGLE DETAIL. If he wants to complain, let him complain then
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"