Superman Returns Who would rather have direct Superman?

Who would you rather direct Superman?

  • Brett Ratner "X-Men: The Last Stand" "Superman JJ Abrams project"

  • Sam Rami "Spider-man" "Spider-man 2" "Spider-man 3"

  • Tim Burton "Batman" "Batman Returns" "Superman Lives"

  • Richard Donner "Superman:The Movie"

  • Mark Steven Johnson "Daredevil" "Ghost Rider"

  • Ang Lee from "The Hulk"

  • Tim Story "Fantastic 4"

  • David S. Goyer "Blade" "Blade II" Blade Trinity" "The Flash"

  • Christopher Nolan "Batman Begins"

  • Jonathan Hensleigh "The Punisher"

  • Joel Schumacher "Batman Forever" "Batman & Robin"

  • Jon Favreau "Iron Man"

  • Joss Whedon "Wonder Woman"

  • Bryan Singer "X-Men" "X2: X-Men United"


Results are only viewable after voting.
darwinwins said:
raimi shouldn't be allowed near a movie that expects to be taken seriously. like spider-man but it's not a serious film. it's campy.


WTF are you on about ? Raimi's Spider-man films are superb and a credit to the genre.

Infact, if Raimi had not made those 2 films so well, you may not have had the glut of films like SR & BB that have followed and been based in a reality. I suppose you would have liked Joel Schumacher to be the definitive superhero film director ?

"Campy" ? The only thing I see that is campy, is your internet bravado.

:rolleyes:
 
campy. very very campy. like the scene when doc oct's tentacles first come to life in the surgery scene. the sudden pans and zooms and of the cast shadows on the walls.

young osborn pulling out the stelletto to stab spider-man and being all melodramatic ... maybe he can act or maybe he can't; either way, the acting and tension in that scene are two things missing from it.

after the car goes through the window of the cafe when mary jane and peter are talking -- the camera does one of those sudden jarring zooms everytime doc takes a step closer and they're looking around like what's coming, when in the very next shot, we see doc quite a ways away and peter and mary jane stand around looking for what coulds possibly thrown that car toward them.

i'm not saying it was a bad movie -- it's was just campy.

to see the vast difference in tone raimi has and what isn't a campy style, look at For Love of the Game with kevin costner.
 
Captain Villa said:
Erm.....SUPERMAN RETURNS does not fill that criteria of an unknown and star studded support cast ?:rolleyes:
*coughsarcasmcough*
 
i just want this film to be directed by a true blue Superman fan. Spiderman has that in Raimi, do we have that in Singer? only time will tell.

24 days to go......
 
Great another Newb who thinks everything unrealistic is "campy".

:rolleyes:

Camp

An affectation or appreciation of manners and tastes commonly thought to be artificial, vulgar, or banal.
Banality, vulgarity, or artificiality when deliberately affected or when appreciated for its humor: “Camp is popularity plus vulgarity plus innocence” (Indra Jahalani).

adj.
Having deliberately artificial, vulgar, banal, or affectedly humorous qualities or style: played up the silliness of their roles for camp effect.

Maybe you ought to learn the meanings of the words you quote.
 
Captain Villa said:
Great another Newb who thinks everything unrealistic is "campy".

:rolleyes:



Maybe you ought to learn the meanings of the words you quote.

from merriam-webster: 4 : something self-consciously exaggerated or theatrical

ah yes, another person who automatically assumes being a n00b is being associated with postcount.
 
darwinwins said:
from merriam-webster: 4 : something self-consciously exaggerated or theatrical

ah yes, another person who automatically assumes being a n00b is being associated with postcount.


So the entire world of cinema is "camp" then , according to that definition.

Look at the one I posted. It's from something called "Oxford dictionary" - It's what defines the English language.
 
darwinwins said:
4 : something self-consciously exaggerated or theatrical

The key word is in bold. Isn't this theatre to begin with? This is not a documentary filmed from life scenes...its a movie. Movies are supposed to be theatrical.
 
what so no one goes to the theatre anymore? the difference between cinema and theatre are pretty wide and well defined.
 
nosebleed said:
The key word is in bold. Isn't this theatre to begin with? This is not a documentary filmed from life scenes...its a movie. Movies are supposed to be theatrical.

:up:
 
F4 was a type of success....it drew in people with 3 kinda known actors, 1 unknown and 1 hot actress celeb in Alba.
 
i wouldnt mind Cameron taking over the Wonder Woman franchise-- so long as he resepcts the character and not go about reinventing her just cuz she's not as popular as Batman and Superman :mad:
 
I don't think Cameron will do a superhero movie...or was that someone else. I remember reading one of the big time directors said they wouldn't touch one.
 
James Cameron's supposed to do some dark angel movie sort of thing in 3d, isn't he?
 
James Cameron's next movie is Battle Angel...its based on an anime I think.

edit: his next movie coming out is called "Avatar":

"A love story set against interplanetary war."

filmed using digital 3d camera. same goes for Battle Angel which comes out a year later.

b_battle_angel_alita.jpg
 
nosebleed said:
I don't think Cameron will do a superhero movie...or was that someone else. I remember reading one of the big time directors said they wouldn't touch one.
You might be thinking of Tarintino, who said that.
 
nosebleed said:
I don't think Cameron will do a superhero movie...or was that someone else. I remember reading one of the big time directors said they wouldn't touch one.

I think you are wrong.

It was he who spent many years and court battles "trying" to resurrect Spider-Man. Infact, the organic web shooters are still his concept.


The World Entertainment News Network is reporting that Titanic director James Cameron is declining to direct the newly announced Sony Spider-Man film.

Over the past 10 years, various writers and directors, including Cameron, who wrote a treatment for the project, have been vying for the rights to bring Stan Lee and Steve Ditko's web-slinging superhero to the big screen.

But despite a legal breakthrough which allows Sony Pictures to proceed with the film franchise, Cameron is now refusing to get reinvolved with the venture, even though comic giant Stan Lee has begged for him to direct the film, according to WENN.

Cameron told WENN, "I have definitely moved on. It was something I really wanted to do eight years ago when I was first after the project. But your ideas change and the ways in which you want to proportion your life's energies.

When you make a film every two or three years, you make that decision very carefully and not just because everyone wants you to make it." Cameron added, "They will find some young man or woman to bring it alive."



Source: Splash (3/18/99
 
Yeah, I know that Cameron was battling for Spider-Man. Who the hell was it then? Maybe it was Tarantino...or Lucas...or Spielberg...or Singer...j/k.
 
Captain Villa said:
Probably Tarantino...............unless he gets offered Punisher :D

That...my fine feathered friend...would be TOO cool.
 
The guy I wanted to direct Superman from day one, was and will remain...


Ron Howard
20ronb.jpg
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,310
Messages
22,083,683
Members
45,883
Latest member
marvel2099fan89
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"