The Question
Objectivism doesn't work.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
- Messages
- 40,541
- Reaction score
- 30
- Points
- 58
Exactly...screw those nose/lip rings...none of those women would look any worse without the tattoos...finding slim, nice figure women...throwing ink on them...and using that to justify tattoos is so silly argument.![]()
His argument is that he thinks they look nice. How is that silly?
Saying that there's anything wrong with women getting tattoos or that they represent the moral decay of society or that it's too masculine and they should be more feminine is a silly argument. It's also a sexist argument and a needlessly judgmental argument.
There's nothing wrong with getting tattoos. A woman getting a tattoo is not hurting anyone, not even herself. Not all women get tattoos to rebel or to beg for people's attention. Most of them do it because they think tattoos are kind of cool. They think they look nice, they think the idea of permanently getting a word or symbol that has some meaning to them tattooed into their skin is just kind of neat. They're not immoral or emotionally scarred. They just like something that doesn't really have an appeal to you. That's fine. There are a lot of people who like things that you don't have an interest in, that doesn't mean they're bad people or that there's anything wrong with their interest. Thinking otherwise is very immature.
And thinking that there's a way that women are "supposed" to behave and when they start behaving in a way that men are "supposed" to behave is just sexist. It's not admitting fact of life, it's saying that people shouldn't engage in harmless activities that don't correspond with the activities people that have the same kind of genitals they do usually engage in because it, for some reason, makes you uncomfortable. That's really immature too.