The Amazing Spider-Man With Great Power, Comes Great Lounging - Part 10

I didn't talk Batman :o
Lounge, more goes than Spidey :o
You know, those Spider-Man/Batman crossover stories deserve more recognition, same with those Spider-Man/Superman stories
 
I didn't talk Batman :o
Lounge, more goes than Spidey :o
You know, those Spider-Man/Batman crossover stories deserve more recognition, same with those Spider-Man/Superman stories

I wasn't referring to you. lol

Enough with Batman though... there is a section for that.
 
Something Spidey related....um....what villain do you guys should get some more respect/spotlight?
 
Electro. ;)

Hopefully this movie gives him more attention. I think they were smart to cast Jamie Foxx as the villain, especially now after the success of Django Unchained.
 
Electro. ;)

Hopefully this movie gives him more attention. I think they were smart to cast Jamie Foxx as the villain, especially now after the success of Django Unchained.

It all depends I suppose. Imo, everyone knows how I feel about Lizard in TAS-M but the bad job that it was, it didn't give Lizard any less of respect that the villain already had, or the spotlight in comics, so to say it could make a more unknown villain more known if Electro's done well in the sequel is up in the air.
 
Something Spidey related....um....what villain do you guys should get some more respect/spotlight?

I was going to say Spot but Anno beat me to it, so I guess I'll say Shocker. I've always liked Shocker, and I want to see him taken a bit more seriously.
 
What these three guys said
Electro, Spot, and Shocker
 
Spot's cool. I don't remember reading comics with him in them, but I have seen him in the 90s cartoon. Loved his episodes.
 
Read Spectacular Spider-Man by Al Milgrom (writer) and Herb Trimpe (artist, with real good work in Spectacular) from issues 90-100
 
Like Picard, I really only know who Spot is because of the 90's series. And I liked him for the most part.
And I'd like Shocker to get some respect too. Heck, make him like he was in the game based on the first Spidey movie. Just...ya know....change the quilt suit :p
 
I agree about both Spot and Shocker! Spot has some great potential and while Shocker is totally awesome already, he deserves some more respect.

Just spent some time playing good ol' Crash Bandicoot 2 and 3. Still awesome! The closest to such a charmy, not-too-serious-fun game of this generation that I've played is probably Shattered Dimensions. SD feels more awesome the more I think about it!

EDIT: Not saying it's nearly in the same league of quality as the old Crash games though.
 
Last edited:
And so it is the opinion of yours that Brant is best suited outside of Jameson's office as well then, yes? Or are you saying what I say is opinion and what you say is fact? :whatever:
Its a fact because it has been like that most of the times in the comics and the cartoons,Jesus How many time should I repeat myself?

Blake's explanation doesn't need flashbacks. To only ask for flashbacks is saying you didn't seem to understand his explanation for some apparent reason because it was explained enough, and as I mentioned, I have rarely heard this nitpick. Only from a couple, but those were mostly the same nitpickers that would agree with the entire Honest Trailer stuff.
Blake explanation made it seem like any person can guess Batman's identity
A flashback would have been a great opportunity to clear things up and also show Blake's intelligence which would make him seem more deserving to carry on Batman's legacy

A dozen? No, not at all. Perhaps a couple and as many things TDK needed explanations with, and you are kidding yourself when you think it's so many. If anything, you're overlooking subtle things or moments that was meant to be a more philosophical meaning than just supposed logic such as a young Talia climbing the Pit.
Yeah A 10 year old can jump farther than Batman,makes sense
The Honest trailer made the correct title
'The Dark Knight Raises a lot of questions'

He knew the kind of person Blake was, he knew that when he was around Blake, the guy wasn't using any weapons. He knew that the anger Bruce had, Blake has but he's also trying to control the anger and not let the anger control him.
So any guy who doesnt uses guns can become the Batman?
And Blake probably used guns a hell lot of times,you telling that Bruce Wayne knew what kind of Person blake was doesnt make sense because he was around enough or there was no occasion to suggest that he wont use weapons anymore

And don't bring up "Well Blake hasn't trained". We only see Blake finding the cave, so it's only speculation to even say he'll don the Batsuit without taking time to train.
There must have been a lot more guys worthy of the Bat suit who were more trained than Blake
As I said before,I found no occasion where I found him worthy enough,even apart from the Physical aspect

What got me to that conclusion? When he wants to pass the mantle of the Batman down, but he doesn't want someone having to resort to guns in doing so. Any of those "Sons of Batman" guys could have very well taken up the mantle if Bruce saw any one of those being as brave and as daring as Blake was in TDKR.
Needless to say,there were more daring than Blake was in TDKR
They risked their life to fight crime despite that not being their job,one of them even sacrificed himself to the Joker and never chickened out and held his own till the end
And besides Blake wasnt doing anything extraordinary,it was all his Job as a police officer.

And once again with Blake using guns as an officer...no **** he did, but he stopped.
There was nothing concrete to suggest that he stopped
And you are giving too much emphasis to the guns thingy

So while Nolan's trilogy actually has some consistency with its logic...you want to throw out consistency as well along with logic for Sandman? Interesting.
Because Logic and Consistency was always flawed with Sandman since he was invented

And yet he did explain it. It was faster than normal, but it was explained of how Bruce's back was healed.
He never explained it
So he limps around for 8 years and suddenly a magic brace that can heal him,the limp was supposed to be there due to his fall at the end of TDK right? So he runs towards his bike at the end of TDK but cannot walk without his stick for 8 years after that?
A broken back cant be healed with a karate chop,realistically a man with a broken back will end up paralysed
 
Last edited:
Its a fact because it has been like that most of the times in the comics and the cartoons,Jesus How many time should I repeat myself?

Then it's a fact that Jameson should not have been a comedy relief since nothing showed Jameson being a comedy relief before Raimi's '02 film.

Only going by your great logic there, bud.

Blake explanation made it seem like any person can guess Batman's identity
A flashback would have been a great opportunity to clear things up and also show Blake's intelligence which would make him seem more deserving to carry on Batman's legacy

The person who deduced Batman's identity is the person who shall become Batman..."The World's Greatest Detective"....I don't think you understand what that means of how Blake knew it and no one else didn't.

And no, a flashback would be useless. We see Blake's intelligence already in the film itself, so what would a flashback do? Nothing, that's what.

"Jesus, how many times should I repeat myself?"

Yeah A 10 year old can jump farther than Batman,makes sense
The Honest trailer made the correct title
'The Dark Knight Raises a lot of questions'

Makes sense on a philosophical level that the child had the fear helping her along the way. Maybe you just don't understand things like that? In that case, yah, I am right about you being in the group of nitpickers that believe everything that Honest Trailer brought up.

So any guy who doesnt uses guns can become the Batman?
And Blake probably used guns a hell lot of times,you telling that Bruce Wayne knew what kind of Person blake was doesnt make sense because he was around enough or there was no occasion to suggest that he wont use weapons anymore

Twisting my words around. Usually what happens when a poster can't really continue with his side of the argument.

And Wayne knew enough about Blake from his own experience around the guy. Let alone, he obviously could have looked into Blake's life when he was able to find stuff out about Bane earlier.

There must have been a lot more guys worthy of the Bat suit who were more trained than Blake

Name one that we've seen in the trilogy.

As I said before,I found no occasion where I found him worthy enough,even apart from the Physical aspect

And that's you. No one else has believed this except for you as well.

Needless to say,there were more daring than Blake was in TDKR
They risked their life to fight crime despite that not being their job,one of them even sacrificed himself to the Joker and never chickened out and held his own till the end
And besides Blake wasnt doing anything extraordinary,it was all his Job as a police officer.

You mean almost sacrificing his life to save 3,000 wasn't as well received to you as someone sacrificing his life to Joker? NEEDLESS to say, I wouldn't call that sacrificing. He was caught and answered the Joker's question. Only saying that he isn't afraid of people like Joker doesn't make him any more brave than Blake.

Nor does it matter if it was "part of his job" being a police officer. He threw his badge away and still wanted to do good even. Was that part of his job? After throwing his badge, he could've just become some lazy kid.

There was nothing concrete to suggest that he stopped
And you are giving too much emphasis to the guns thingy

Throwing his gun away didn't tell you that he didn't want to fire a gun again? Things go right over your head, huh?

Because Logic and Consistency was always flawed with Sandman since he was invented

And that is why Sandman is far worse than anything in Nolan's trilogy. You made my point for me, thanks.

He never explained it
So he limps around for 8 years and suddenly a magic brace that can heal him,the limp was supposed to be there due to his fall at the end of TDK right? So he runs towards his bike at the end of TDK but cannot walk without his stick for 8 years after that?
A broken back cant be healed with a karate chop,realistically a man with a broken back will end up paralysed

The vertebrae? Yes, Nolan explained it. It's only a matter if one doesn't like the answer that is given, but it would only be ignorant to say it wasn't explained in the film.

And the limp...watch TDK again since you need to watch that parking garage scene anyways, but you'll see Batman LIMPING to the Bat-pod at the end of the film and he continues to limp until he gets that brace and until he climbs out of the Pit. And while there's no medical reasoning of how his leg became better, it adds to the intrigue of the Pit and how it is indeed viewed as Nolan's version of the Lazarus Pit where Bruce climbs out of the Pit a new person so to speak. And even after that, he never does anything meaningful with that leg and even kicks Bane using his other leg during their second fight.
 
Last edited:
That vid you posted Anno is another proof of why Christian Bale is one of the best (IMO even THE best) actors out there! Beautiful! I love him!
 
Indeed. Not just some actor, but a real genuine man even with his past "eccentric" moments.

And to even bring up the message of Nolan's trilogy really shows that Bale is so proud of those films to even bring it up when the conversation centered around Batman. Really great moment of bringing that up to Zach.
 
Just spent some time playing good ol' Crash Bandicoot 2 and 3. Still awesome! The closest to such a charmy, not-too-serious-fun game of this generation that I've played is probably Shattered Dimensions. SD feels more awesome the more I think about it!
I love those old Crash Bandicoot games
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"